I know that they do it in the NCAA. I know they do it in professional tennis. In tennis they have a ranking system that is a year round evaluation of tournaments played, year after year after year. It still has its flaws. The NCAA uses rating index numbers such as RPI and other indicators, along with polls, and then there is a committee that is put together from non partisan participants that select the teams and the seeding. That is still scrutinized and argued.
I said that to say this, there is no way for the TSSAA to put together that type of data base, program, and personnell to do something like this. Where do they find non partisan people to select the teams and seeds?
Personally, I don't want any part of that. Let them continue to select them how they do, and let the chips fall where they may. I will take that any day of the week over a selection committee deciding who desereves to be the 1 seed, 2 seed and etcetera. Too much room for bias to creep in. I don't trust folk to do it fairly. I'd much rather it turn out like it did then to have some yahoo say that team 1 is more deserving over team 2 any day of the week. I don't trust folks enough. Remove any chance of bias to creep in. That's what the current system has in place. That is why they use it.
I don't care if two undefeated teams play against each other in the first round. I don't care one bit. I do care if some team may apear to get prefferential treatment. With selection committees, there is a possiblility that bias plays a part of seeding and what not.
NOPE. Keep it as it is!