mnewballer21

so you guys are saying that whoever loses their bowl games in the NCAA should not be ranked at the end, but any team that wins their bowl game should....just because you lost in the playoffs doesn't mean there are 16 teams better than you....I'm sorry but William Blount is a lot better than 90% of the teams still in the playoffs and they barely squeaked by DB, i still see an 11-1 team being in the top 10 before a 7-4

stop talking until sevier beats WB

how do you attempt a 12 yard field goal, you can't kick the ball on the 2 can you?

oh ok sorry, well last i saw was 20 or 21-6 farragut winning, somebody posted that

haven't seen anything yet, sorry, i've updated as much as i can from region 1 and 2, but haven't seen that score...but i just found the link where you can listen to it, here.

yes

Click on the game you wish to hear come 7:00

this poll is 100% correct

you are, no team that loses 77-8 should be in a top 10, ever

i was responding to you and wildman

Yeah, I agree with that, they are not all that strong, especially in comparison to last year. But they are by no means one of the worst in the state

that doesn't mean the whole region is weak...and there were only 2 games that oak ridge was not really in, the DB and Ooltewah games...the farragut game was just a sloppy mudfield game that was tied at the half and a few bounces went the wrong way for oak ridge, and the mcminn and william blount losses came down to the final seconds/play...Oak Ridge was not a bad team this year, they had a great defense. They are a bounce here or there from being 7-3 and a 3 seed in the playoffs, all you have seen is their record

i dont see how you think region 2 is so weak anyway just because oak ridge had a down year...

Red Bank is good, but you cannot say for sure how good they are. The competition they have played is down right terrible. Yes, their defensive stats are very impressive, but the teams they have done it against are absolutely no good. Minus the Cleveland game, in the other 7 games they held opponents under 10 points, those opponents records are a combined 20-50, with 12 of those 20 wins coming from 2 teams(brainerd and hixson). Yes, Red Bank is good, and has impressive stats, but I would not talk about aspirations of knocking off Maryville until you get a little ways into the playoffs , because you cannot use your schedule to date for an argumentative stance on why you will beat them.

Go Blue!

If, and thats a big if, DB and Ooltewah were to meet, the game would be at Ooltewah. So they would not have to be away from the nest.

how is that? he doesn't have 2,000 yards at the end of the season?

yeah thats the stadium that goes up forever, but it only has one side, right?

i'm talking about the 3 wide open sacks where the ooltewah defender had a wide open lane to the qb and went for a kill shot instead of just tackling the guy and missed, those 3 missed sacks led to 3 huge passing plays on every play because its hard for a db to cover a wr for 10 seconds....and the missed field goal, well that was only set up because a wrong route by a receiver that caused an interception, you didn't get any yards on that drive, maybe if you had you would have gotten a field goal

i'd also like to know how they got lucky against farragut, i can't comment on the WB game b/c i didn't see it, but by no means did ooltewah get lucky against farragut, farragut is a good team, but 3 missed sacks would have made that game a 2+ td game, there was no luck involved in that win.....and TG24, i'm with you, with WB's defense you guys will give DB a game contrary to popular belief on these boards

josh is with the saints and daniel is with the lions, and both of them are having pretty good years

i wouldn't call them crappy, i mean they are inches/seconds away from being a 7-2 football team rather than 5-4, you aren't going to just go in and dominate them, and they are by no means "crappy"

you lost to bradley

he's still kicking at the University of Georgia, Andy Bailey

i'm sure ooltewah would love to prove they are better than how they played against you too