Jump to content

MUS-MBA


tsr7487
 Share

Recommended Posts

I look for MBA to play well and hopefully get the win.  They have regained confidence and both offense and defense seem to be clicking.  I was really happy with Andy Snyder's performance on the ground last week (~160 yds. ?) and hopefully they will be able to run the ball again this week.  One advantage for MBA might be the fact thet they've played two teams already that throw alot.  I know MUS is more balanced than in years past, but I think they still like to throw it, which could benefit the Big Red.  This game being played at MBA will no doubt help, as well.

 

Roll Red!

825733786[/snapback]

 

home field advantage proved important last year, but has not always been the case.. and to run on the mus defense will be a tall task

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 80
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

As an aside to the game, check out MUS's website.  They've put together a football program for the 2005 season (click on the image at the website):

 

2005 MUS Football Program

 

This is the most impressive guide I have seen on the high school level.  It has a college media guide look to it.  Nice!

825734296[/snapback]

 

as im sure MBA knows.. its amazing the things a school gets when it wins a state title

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who ever says MUS will win is wrong, MBA is going to win because MUS lost key people last year. MUS's QB, WR, and MLB were amazing. They don't have that this year. MBA by two or more touchdowns

825734271[/snapback]

 

MBA lost a lot more than MUS. Who is MBA brining back besides Howe and Snyder? Byrdsong's gone. Bubis's gone. Hahnfield's gone. Shillinglaw's gone.

 

MUS has Park's little brother at QB and he's been great so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who ever says MUS will win is wrong, MBA is going to win because MUS lost key people last year. MUS's QB, WR, and MLB were amazing. They don't have that this year. MBA by two or more touchdowns

825734271[/snapback]

 

 

someones just bitter that they dont lose any players and they still cant get over the hump.. where as MUS lost SOME key players and still has been successful.. 8 starters back on a D that was tops in the state.. 5/6 players back that saw significant time or started are back on offense

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who ever says MUS will win is wrong, MBA is going to win because MUS lost key people last year. MUS's QB, WR, and MLB were amazing. They don't have that this year. MBA by two or more touchdowns

825734271[/snapback]

 

So you are saying 3 people won the game for MUS last year against 11? I am sorry but with this statement you are lacking some serious intellectual judgement. Yes, MUS lost quite a bit on offense but they also had plenty to step up and fill the slots. ( I played for MUS last year at Center and I know they have competent guys in there atm although the offensive line is a bit slow ) The defense is as strong if not stronger than last year's; they have a lot more experience and seem to be coming together as a unit very well. Look as I have said before for this one to come down to the last minutes in the fourth quarter. It will be a fun highschool game to watch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • Recent Posts

    • A little confused.  What charter/prep schools made it to state in Baseball?  
    • Fortuitously encountering Clint amidst the ambience of Goodyear this morning sparked an impromptu yet intellectually stimulating conversation, wherein we engaged in a rigorous assessment of prospective candidates for the esteemed role of head football coach. Our discourse, characterized by its spontaneity and depth, led to the formulation of astute observations and discerning judgments regarding the suitability of various individuals for this pivotal position. Allow me to elucidate the fruits of our collaborative contemplation: This commentary endeavors to offer a discerning articulation of my subjective viewpoint, emphasizing a conscientious commitment to maintaining impartiality and refraining from any semblance of derogation directed towards individuals.  Those who possess meritorious qualifications for the esteemed head coaching role, delineated without hierarchical precedence, include: Rennard Woodmore, an esteemed alumnus of the Yellow Jackets, presents a magnificent pedigree, having held prominent positions in head coaching capacities across various regions. His pivotal role as a coordinator for teams contending for state championships further enhances his stature in the realm of football leadership. Kyle Gregory, erstwhile adorned in the resplendent gold insignia, though lacking direct head coaching experience, brings to the fore his invaluable insights garnered as a coordinator for esteemed teams, showcasing an acute understanding of the requisites for triumph whilst attired in the esteemed purple and gold regalia. Steven Jackson, whose contributions transcended mere clipboard duties under the tutelage of Kevin Creasy, emerges as an exceptional candidate for Trousdale County. His prior tenure and triumphs as an assistant coach underscore his suitability for the role. The sole drawback lies in his lack of affiliation with Trousdale County as an alumnus. Brandon Eden's extensive tenure within the chronicles of Trousdale County football, spanning a significant portion of its State Championships, coupled with his successful stints as a coordinator across diverse locales, underscores his candidacy despite a dearth of direct head coaching experience at the high school level. Davy Cothron, while beset by a modest playing career, has emerged as a luminary in offensive strategy, drawing parallels to the transformative appointment of Barker in 2015, thereby warranting consideration for his proven acumen in this realm. Joshua Hackett, notwithstanding his non-alumnus status, has left an indelible imprint across Middle Tennessee, distinguished by his adept curation of formidable defensive units as a coordinator at Watertown, albeit without direct head coaching experience. Kevin Creasy, the epitome of coaching prowess, merits an offer irrespective of his current inclinations, his unparalleled capacity to secure victories transcending geographical and institutional bounds, potentially extending to a role as Director of Schools should it align with his aspirations. Conversely, individuals who have not demonstrably earned the mantle of head coaching, enumerated without sequential precedence, encompass: Brad Waggoner David Barker Paul Pitts Jeremy Pruitt Clint Satterfield Robbie Atwood Wesley Satterfield Ben Johnson BJ West Whom do you all deem most fitting to assume the mantle of the next coach, and what rationale informs your choice? Conversely, whom do you perceive as ill-suited for the role, and what underpins your reasoning for their exclusion?
    • He's a Clinton fan.  But I wouldn't admit that either.  
    • Their any schedule out their for team camp?
    • This sums it all up to perfection.  
×
  • Create New...