scott county vs. fulton

[kwalker4]

Not to take anything away from Scott because those guys played their hearts out. BUT, Scott scored 6 points in the first half. The rest of their points were scored when Fulton had their 2nd & 3rd string in.

[WrittenWord]

Not to take anything away from Scott because those guys played their hearts out. BUT, Scott scored 6 points in the first half. The rest of their points were scored when Fulton had their 2nd & 3rd string in.

 

I wasn't at the game, so I cannot say. But Fulton did play their starting offense the entire way. I would assume that since they played their starters on offense through the fourth quarter, they also played their starters on defense. Someone can correct me if I am wrong.

 

Turtle, read my post again, brother. It's called sarcasm. They teach you boys at Austin-East about sarcasm?

[kwalker4]

I was at the game & know the players on the team. The starters didn't play the whole game. Never-the-less #44 for Scott is a very fast RB.

[Old_Highlander_13]

I was there two and i beileve fultons 2nd team was in for bout 4 or 5 plays and smith had about 30 yards he gained everything else on his own.

[WrittenWord]

I was at the game & know the players on the team. The starters didn't play the whole game. Never-the-less #44 for Scott is a very fast RB.

 

Interesting. I thought #6 scored a 60+ yard touchdown with about 4:22 remaining in the fourth, the last score for either team.

[bleachercoach]

it's over! you lost! move on to the next game.

[LEONARDSLOSERS]

When you are trying to break in a young QB you give him lots of reps. That is probably why the starters were still in. You also don't want to have a backup lineman blocking for your new young QB. They cant afford to lose another Qb.