CYJacket Posted November 15, 2005 Report Share Posted November 15, 2005 If it would have been different, seems like the difference would have been in Cloudlands favor, It sure didn,t hurt Coalfield for Cloudland to lose one of their very best players on both sides of the ball, What I meant for short is that Cloudland would have had more weapons. I think Coalfield would have adjusted to the situation and stopped him enough to still keep it interesting. Don't know what he did on defense, didn't see but two plays with him in the game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pujo Posted November 15, 2005 Report Share Posted November 15, 2005 What I meant for short is that Cloudland would have had more weapons. I think Coalfield would have adjusted to the situation and stopped him enough to still keep it interesting. Don't know what he did on defense, didn't see but two plays with him in the game. Best linbacker, he,s always had weak ankles and everyone in this area knew if he ever went down ,Cloudland would be in trouble. He definately wasn't the whole team, but he sure made the whole team better,both ways. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dawgwriter Posted November 15, 2005 Report Share Posted November 15, 2005 EXACTLY, how does a team drop down two classifications that quick... While playing 3A the past four years, Trousdale was actually the 9th smallest 2A team (in terms of enrollment). They, along with some other teams in their old 3A region, were playing up a class by choice. When reclassification numbers were crunched last year, they were below the 1A line and they chose to play at that classification. Their enrollment number changed little over those four years, I would guess. They are now one of the largest 1A schools in enrollment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the truth is... Posted November 15, 2005 Report Share Posted November 15, 2005 Even your man said CYJacket said this would have been a different game if Horney had stayed in the game. YOU ARE RIGHT. BUT WHO IS TO SAY THAT IF HE HAD PLAYED THE WHOLE GAME,HE MIGHT HAVE FUMBLED 3 TIMES, SLIPPED IN THE BACKFIELD 6 TIMES, AND MISSED 10 TACKLES ON DEFENSE? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incrediblefan Posted November 15, 2005 Report Share Posted November 15, 2005 Pujo the better question is this: if they played "up" to three A when in AA, why not play up in AA when in 1a? Answer, no Boyd, no CPA. Boo Hoo...here we go with this same ol' song. TC scared of privates. I didn't here this complaint when when TC was playing in 3A...now, when they come back to 1A they are scared...who cares. Everyone complained about the privates when they were in 1A - now they can complain about TC. Doesn't matter, TC will listen to your complaints while shining their gold ball this year. Because like it or not...they ARE a 1A team!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pujo Posted November 15, 2005 Report Share Posted November 15, 2005 Boo Hoo...here we go with this same ol' song. TC scared of privates. I didn't here this complaint when when TC was playing in 3A...now, when they come back to 1A they are scared...who cares. Everyone complained about the privates when they were in 1A - now they can complain about TC. Doesn't matter, TC will listen to your complaints while shining their gold ball this year. Because like it or not...they ARE a 1A team!!! I like it the way it is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CYJacket Posted November 15, 2005 Report Share Posted November 15, 2005 Boo Hoo...here we go with this same ol' song. TC scared of privates. I didn't here this complaint when when TC was playing in 3A...now, when they come back to 1A they are scared...who cares. Everyone complained about the privates when they were in 1A - now they can complain about TC. Doesn't matter, TC will listen to your complaints while shining their gold ball this year. Because like it or not...they ARE a 1A team!!! Yep they are 1a, probably gonna win it all. But you know, I would rather have honor, and be above board to accomplish that goal than slink in the background awaiting an opportunity. That appears kinda slimy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sportsdude20 Posted November 15, 2005 Report Share Posted November 15, 2005 They're a 1A team...and CY you might want to watch your mouth with those Coalfield boys and their needles Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CYJacket Posted November 15, 2005 Report Share Posted November 15, 2005 (edited) I agreed they were 1A. Needles? That is funny. I am trained to look for things like that and never seen any indication thereof. Sorry to disappoint dud, or I mean dude. However, do play again. Edited November 15, 2005 by CYJacket Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pujo Posted November 15, 2005 Report Share Posted November 15, 2005 Yep they are 1a, probably gonna win it all. But you know, I would rather have honor, and be above board to accomplish that goal than slink in the background awaiting an opportunity. That appears kinda slimy. Time and unforseen things come to us all. I think Trousdale has one coming, pride before a fall. Just too much arrogance. They very well may be the best, but the best don't always win. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gobbler51 Posted November 15, 2005 Report Share Posted November 15, 2005 The past couple of years, Region 2 has been much stronger than Region 1. But this year, it seems that Region 2 has fallen down to about where Region 1 is. The past two years, Region 2 has had 5 teams who could beat the top team in Region 1, arguably. This year, however, I only see two decent teams in the region, being Coalfield and Harriman. I don't know much about Region 1 this year, but from scores I assume that they haven't improved that noticeably since last year. Regardless, it is my belief that CAK would be enjoying great success this time of year if they still played single A football. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pujo Posted November 15, 2005 Report Share Posted November 15, 2005 The past couple of years, Region 2 has been much stronger than Region 1. But this year, it seems that Region 2 has fallen down to about where Region 1 is. The past two years, Region 2 has had 5 teams who could beat the top team in Region 1, arguably. This year, however, I only see two decent teams in the region, being Coalfield and Harriman. I don't know much about Region 1 this year, but from scores I assume that they haven't improved that noticeably since last year. Regardless, it is my belief that CAK would be enjoying great success this time of year if they still played single A football. Cloudland was head and sholders better than anyone in regio 2 two years ago. It just wasn't to be. I will agree that this CAK team would be a handful for anyone in either region. Coalfield ,Hampton and a healthy Cloudland could hold their own. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.