Jump to content

science hill bearden


dawgs2
 Share

Recommended Posts

They will have to win at least one doubles. Last year Chris Smith and their #4 lost to Siegel's #3 and #5. It will be tough to win if it goes to doubles vs. Siegel. Thats assuming they split the top 4 and Science Hill takes #5 from Siegel. If Siegel were to win 3 out of top 4 singles they will be state champs again. Regardless, will be a good match to watch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE(Harris @ May 9 2007 - 10:02 AM) 826455340[/snapback]They will have to win at least one doubles. Last year Chris Smith and their #4 lost to Siegel's #3 and #5. It will be tough to win if it goes to doubles vs. Siegel. Thats assuming they split the top 4 and Science Hill takes #5 from Siegel. If Siegel were to win 3 out of top 4 singles they will be state champs again. Regardless, will be a good match to watch.

 

 

IF Siegel/Science Hill do play:

 

#1 Siegel

#2 Science Hill

#3 Siegel

#4 Siegel

#5 Science Hill

 

It will come down to doubles not matter what if these teams end up playing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It things work like there supposed to Siegel and Science Hill should be playing in the finals. I dont want to make any speculations becuase both teams are talented. Yes it will come down to doubles, but I belive it could go either way. Just depends on witch team has a better day. It'll be a good match

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(nation_supp89 @ May 12 2007 - 05:46 PM) 826458114[/snapback]The lineup is different this year. Wilkinson has moved up to #2 and might even play #1

 

I would never take Wilkinson over Smith.

Smith was at least close with Wishing last year. Wilkinson should have lost to Siegel's #2 last year. No way he can beat Wishing if he can barely beat #2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(Harris @ May 13 2007 - 11:38 AM) 826458395[/snapback]I would never take Wilkinson over Smith.

Smith was at least close with Wishing last year. Wilkinson should have lost to Siegel's #2 last year. No way he can beat Wishing if he can barely beat #2

 

 

Wilkinson played #3 for SH last year. He beat Roger Briggs earlier this year. I don't know though, the lineup still may have Chris Smith at #1. Either way, Siegel should win #1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • One school has said it, it was York…who Oneida and many school that played them before we did claimed that they were the dirtiest bunch they’ve played. Riverside didn’t call us dirty nor did smith after they beat us. Ur only dirty if your the one giving out the whoopins.
    • If it was anyone but #8 I would agree with you. Theirs a couple people on that team that probably would. Not him. And I who was standing on the 1st base line fence saw clearly that the boys foot was covering more than half the bag.
    • If y’all lose to Farragut something awful has happened.
    • Get him to Bearden ASAP! Or anywhere, Karns hs is in rough shape, probably not getting out of it anytime soon.
    • I'm not a Powell grad.  I am a Bearden grad.   My son and daughter are Powell grads.   I did radio play by play for Powell, my last year was 2013. I also did radio play by play for South Doyle, and my last gig was at Maryville before I retired.   My oldest grandson plays in the Karns Middle program, so I see more Karns games than I do Powell these days.  I've been to 3 Powell games since 2013.   I don't have any ties to Powell, haven't since 2013.   No "y'all" there.    And the kid you are talking about does have a very good arm, but he's not the QB that Deuce Rogers is.  Rogers is a legit dual threat guy.  The younger kid now at Clinton, or about to be at Clinton, isn't the dual threat that Rogers is.  
×
  • Create New...