Jump to content

science hill bearden


dawgs2
 Share

Recommended Posts

They will have to win at least one doubles. Last year Chris Smith and their #4 lost to Siegel's #3 and #5. It will be tough to win if it goes to doubles vs. Siegel. Thats assuming they split the top 4 and Science Hill takes #5 from Siegel. If Siegel were to win 3 out of top 4 singles they will be state champs again. Regardless, will be a good match to watch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE(Harris @ May 9 2007 - 10:02 AM) 826455340[/snapback]They will have to win at least one doubles. Last year Chris Smith and their #4 lost to Siegel's #3 and #5. It will be tough to win if it goes to doubles vs. Siegel. Thats assuming they split the top 4 and Science Hill takes #5 from Siegel. If Siegel were to win 3 out of top 4 singles they will be state champs again. Regardless, will be a good match to watch.

 

 

IF Siegel/Science Hill do play:

 

#1 Siegel

#2 Science Hill

#3 Siegel

#4 Siegel

#5 Science Hill

 

It will come down to doubles not matter what if these teams end up playing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It things work like there supposed to Siegel and Science Hill should be playing in the finals. I dont want to make any speculations becuase both teams are talented. Yes it will come down to doubles, but I belive it could go either way. Just depends on witch team has a better day. It'll be a good match

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(nation_supp89 @ May 12 2007 - 05:46 PM) 826458114[/snapback]The lineup is different this year. Wilkinson has moved up to #2 and might even play #1

 

I would never take Wilkinson over Smith.

Smith was at least close with Wishing last year. Wilkinson should have lost to Siegel's #2 last year. No way he can beat Wishing if he can barely beat #2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(Harris @ May 13 2007 - 11:38 AM) 826458395[/snapback]I would never take Wilkinson over Smith.

Smith was at least close with Wishing last year. Wilkinson should have lost to Siegel's #2 last year. No way he can beat Wishing if he can barely beat #2

 

 

Wilkinson played #3 for SH last year. He beat Roger Briggs earlier this year. I don't know though, the lineup still may have Chris Smith at #1. Either way, Siegel should win #1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • Now that wouldn’t surprise me a bit. That has been going on heavily since the days of Larry Kerr @ AC. One of the major reasons CC has never really had much at all, barring about 2 seasons in football. AC milks it dry.
    • Interesting how quite it is. Rumors are going around that Anderson County is being looked at by TSSAA for recruiting violations with the Campbell County transfers. 
    • I heard from a member of the teaching staff that there has been a dispute over use of the game field between football, and girls lacrosse team. Girls had a game and wanted to warm up and football coaches did want to leave. The football coaches came down hard with some bad vulgar language and the girls lacrosse backed down. What a classy act BHS athletics has become.
    • The lawsuit requests a jury trial. Sable Winfree has extremely competent legal representation. FYI - her lawyer represented the Warren County school system for years, and I believe he knows what constitutes a reasonable lawsuit.
    • coach brooks had a an sir fore groves he tryed two shoekase his them there sun and stoppd groves ezally 
×
  • Create New...