Jump to content

TNT Tournament 08


ut18vols
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

How did Crab Orchard play in the James C. Haile and the TNT Tourney I know they would not turn down a championship game just to play in the TNT. Nashville Christian was in the same situation last year and had to forfeit. What makes this any different for Crab Orchard???

 

 

I believe their gametime was moved up at the TNT so that they would be able to play their first game there and then head down to Murfreesboro to play their Championship Game at the James C. Haile. It was reported to me that they played and won their first round game at the TNT, so they must have worked something out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are correct in that these tournaments are not truly "state" tournaments, but are more like "invitational" tournaments. However, they differ greatly from the sectional tournaments becuase they pull talented teams from all three regions of the state, whereas sectional tournaments only have teams from one region of the state. It has been my experience in watching all three, that the level of competition differs each year. Some years teams at the James C. Haile and TNT are a little better than those in the sectional tournaments, especially those that play in the small school division of the TMSAA. Other years, it is vice-versa. Many teams do not join the TMSAA because they restrict the number of games you can have, when you can practice, ect. If you don't join, then you are not limited by their rules. There is no true way to determine which teams are better because there is no one equal playing field for everyone. I too wish that everyone was under one umbrella and that there was one "state" tournament for all middle school and jr. high teams in Tennessee, but that would be nearly impossible.

 

 

I don't know. Last year Harpeth won the small school state sectional for middle Tennessee and lost to TNT winner St. Henry's in OT by a point. The biggest variable I've seen at the middle school level in general is a lack of uniformity and organization. I think the TSSAA should require all middle school feeder programs to be a part of the state organization if their high school teams are members. The game restrictions and other 'rules' are typically for the benefit of the players. There are similar restrictions at the high school level.

 

As it is, even the TMSAA teams won't participate in the area tournaments a lot of times unless they have a competitive team. I mean, this is the first year I've ever seen Greenbrier or Robert Ellis at the area tournament. Waverly, Houston County and William James left the MCAC conference, stayed in TMSAA, yet Waverly is playing at the TNT. What's up with that? Nobody from their new conference participated in the area tournament.

 

Let's put all the middle schools under one umbrella and have the state association run it like they do the high schools. This isn't rocket surgery.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know. Last year Harpeth won the small school state sectional for middle Tennessee and lost to TNT winner St. Henry's in OT by a point. The biggest variable I've seen at the middle school level in general is a lack of uniformity and organization. I think the TSSAA should require all middle school feeder programs to be a part of the state organization if their high school teams are members. The game restrictions and other 'rules' are typically for the benefit of the players. There are similar restrictions at the high school level.

 

As it is, even the TMSAA teams won't participate in the area tournaments a lot of times unless they have a competitive team. I mean, this is the first year I've ever seen Greenbrier or Robert Ellis at the area tournament. Waverly, Houston County and William James left the MCAC conference, stayed in TMSAA, yet Waverly is playing at the TNT. What's up with that? Nobody from their new conference participated in the area tournament.

 

Let's put all the middle schools under one umbrella and have the state association run it like they do the high schools. This isn't rocket surgery.

 

I see no benefit in requiring all middle schools to be under the scrutiny and sanctions of the TSSAA. It would simply be a way for the state association to rake in more money at the expense of small schools just trying squeeze out enough gate money to pay referees.

 

What is the advantage of membership in the TSSAA? Playing in sectional tournaments? That is what James C. Haile and TNT and the like are for. To allow schools to go and play where they want to. Since there is no true "State Champion", I see no need to dictate where schools should have to play.

 

What's more, I don't see the TSSAA having the authority to require any school to be a member of anything. Any high school can drop out of TSSAA as we speak.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But they don't drop out do they? The benefits for middle schools to be in a state association (whether it be TSMAA or not) is the same as for high schools. While high schools don't have to be a part of the TSSAA, 95% of them are.

 

Middle school athletics is a lot like travel ball. There's several 'state' events, which usually means paying an entry fee and nothing more and there's no accountability by the schools to anyone. You can jump conferences or stay an independent and set your own rules for practice times and number of games played. The reward at the end is shallow too. TMSAA crowns how many sectional state champions? Then the independents have 3 or 4 invitational tournaments that water it down even more.

 

Rather than to rake in the money, a middle school association would mean uniformity of rules and regulations and a specified path to a 'state' champion for everyone. Divisions, classifications, regions and districts could all be drawn up similar to what's already in place with a common goal. It's as good an idea as the TSSAA or the NCAA. Why do those entities exist?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You could say that about Greenbrier also,they have beaten quite a few of the TNT teams,and the J.Haile teams as well.maybe Mt.Juliet would like to meet the boys on the hill.I think Greenbrier wanted to scrimmage and Mt.Juliet never could get dates together,i think it would have been a great middle school game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mt. Juliet Middle has beaten 8 teams in the TNT and/or Haile. I would say they are the best team in the state.

 

 

MJ may be the best team in the midstate. But I am sure they would not fare well in real "state tourney" format. Memphis teams would dominate them due to a lack of true presence in the post for MJ. MJ lives off their press and would struggle against teams with skilled post players and a couple of ball handlers. Some of their players have faced Memphis competition in AAU and didn't fare very well against that style of play. They are small but press well and feature very strong guard play. Although, having seen them and Greenbrier I would have to say MJ would win by 10+.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who have they beaten?

 

 

Southside with MJ winning by double digits at Christmas. They also played Allons B-team in a scrimmage and won handily. Who the others are I'm not sure. Some MJ players have faced Crab Orchard in AAU but with mixed results. However, MJ features about 1500 kids in their middle school. Southside has approx. 300 and Crab Orchard maybe 200.

 

Crab Orchard would give them all they could handle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • The only two transfers that Bearden has gotten that went on to play college football were a defensive back from Karnes, who transferred here way before the new coaching staff got here, and a running back from Carter, who went on to play at Maryville College. Both players received those offers while at Bearden, and both players got a diploma from Bearden High School. Therefore, they are Bearden kids, and you can’t do anything about that.   The transfer from Seymour didn’t win the job, what do you expect two quarterbacks to start at the same time? He played great on JV when he could stay healthy, and when he came in on varsity, he did great. The quarterback position is definitely going to be in good hands when the current starting quarterback leaves, but until then, they’re just going to be battling it out like every good quarterback competition does. The current starting quarterback has his flaws, and that is in the pass game, but what he doesn’t have flaws is running and scrambling, and if you go back and watch any game, which I’m sure you didn’t watch any, we used him very often, and when we needed a deep ball, we brought in the transfer from Seymour. The starting quarterback last year will be a senior this year, and the Seymour transfer will be a junior, so the Seymour transfer is definitely going to get his spotlight. He may even win the job this year. Football isn’t about who the newspaper thinks is the best kid. The best kid in the position will win the starting job, and I trust the coaching staff more than a newspaper or article to pick my starting QB.
    • I mean, we’ve only gotten two transfers that went on to play college football, one who went to UT Martin came his second semester junior year before the new coaching staff was here, and the other one went on to play at Maryville College, in which I don’t believe he had any interest prior to transferring.
    • An FYI: To see how an opponent has done against another opponent since 2001- go to the game by clicking on one of the teams. Click the G beside the game. For example, Milan: The info will show you the previous matchups and other info.
    • All these college signees went yo other schools for 3 years, were getting college offers then transferred to Bearden. It’s not like this staff did much to develop them.    The BBall coaches son and the Seymour transfer were some of the most talented QBs in the region, and you guys developed them into QBs who might complete one pass a game. 
    • No my fight, but ... if they were already college-caliber prior to transferring to BHS, and they already had FBS interest, and they end up at an FBS school, how did Bearden do anything for them?
×
  • Create New...