Jump to content

Stewart County @ Waverly


oakwood
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 77
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

In reply to this...

I, too, was at the Greenfield game and I hardly think that SC's behavior is one to be warning refs about. One SC player had 2 calls made against them, but it was for words said, not actions made against another player. And anyone who was in the stands on either side of the field, knows that this issue was very verbally addressed by the coach, and not another call was made after it.

 

Personally, I saw a Greenfield player grab a SC player by the horse collar and pull them down to the ground. I'm pretty sure this is not a favored action, and it was not called by the ref.

 

Their record last year proves that they are not a team that wins games by cheap shots. No team is lucky to have a winning season off cheap shots alone. Since their program reform, their defense has morphed into a well-working machine. Like I said in another blog, if hard-knock hitting qualifies them as a dirty team, then so be it. They are self-motivated boys, who get the job done. They are led by good, quality men who would not let unsportsman like conduct go unpunished. Again demonstrated by SC's head coach verbally addressing the language on the field. The key to any good athlete is determination and intensity, and that is what SC players possess.

 

dude what i can't figure out is if there not a dirty team then why does every team they play say they are dirty. we just played them and they they were as dirty this year as they were last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All I know is this, SC has played two games, and players from both teams said they cussed, talked smack, and threw cheap shots the whole game. But I guess they are all a bunch of sore losers and liars and SC is telling the truth. Give me a break. Waverly, let us know how they treat you.

 

i know iam not being a sore loser i wonder why. yes they were dirty and we got them back for u greenfield and gleason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i know iam not being a sore loser i wonder why. yes they were dirty and we got them back for u greenfield and gleason.

 

You know it's funny, there sire were a lot of S.C. fans on here before the game dogging me for having the nerve of calling them a dirty team. Wonder where they are now? I wish I would have never had to get on here and do it, but I wanted to make sure Waverly wasn't blind sided by how classless this team is. I am glad they did not injure anybody. Maybe they will learn a lesson. Again, congrats to Waverly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hey well guys i wasn't at the game and just got on here but I heard the game wasn't pretty and we just flat out got outplayed but steeler why would you want the bus ride to be painful? i could see it being miserable but why would you want someone in pain? Just wondering

 

hey well guys i wasn't at the game and just got on here but I heard the game wasn't pretty and we just flat out got outplayed but steeler why would you want the bus ride to be painful? i could see it being miserable but why would you want someone in pain? Just wondering

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • Had what I believed would’ve been a good one hired but he showed up and smelled the cooking going on and said no thanks. 
    • Yeah.  Kids only transfer in and out of Bearden these days, you know.   That particular poster evidentially has a personal vendetta with Josh Jones.   Consider the source.  And the kid transferring to McCallie is a terrific talent, but an opportunity to go to McCallie on scholarship (and I am assuming that is the case) is one that is very much beneficial both athletically and academically.  McCallie is a great school for both.   Bearden will be fine.  And so will both of those kids who decided with their parents/advisors to go elsewhere.  
    • I think we are conducting interviews now since we have so many wanting to come to school here and play for a real team with a chance to play in front of lot's of fan's and have a chance to win a championship every year.  
    • Esteemed colleagues, On this auspicious Saturday morning, I fortuitously encountered Dr. Satterfield at the Early Bird Cafe, whereupon we engaged in a discourse concerning the pool of candidates vying for a coveted position. Dr. Satterfield, possessing a discerning eye, has graciously shared insights into the contenders, which I shall now relay to you in a structured manner. Eric Vetetoe, though initially absent from my considerations, ascended to the zenith of Clint's roster, poised atop his discerning clipboard as a preeminent candidate. Kyle Gregory, with a coaching demeanor reminiscent of a bygone era, has captivated Clint's admiration. His interview performance, I am informed, left an indelible impression, aligning seamlessly with Clint's nostalgic sentiments. Davy Cothron's cerebral approach to offense, notwithstanding a past championship game setback, garners high praise from Dr. Satterfield. His strategic acumen, it appears, remains unblemished despite previous trials. Brandon Eden's steadfast allegiance to the team, evidenced by his tenure on the creekbank, earns him considerable favor in Clint's estimation. Anticipation lingers as to whether an offer may be extended in recognition of his unwavering dedication. Wesley Satterfield emerges as a compelling candidate following a favorable assessment by Mr. Satterfield himself. The prospect of a Satterfield succession holds a certain allure, embodying continuity and tradition in equal measure. Kyle Shoulders, a surprising entrant in the applicant pool, impresses Clint with his football intellect, potentially positioning him as a contender for the role. Josh Hackett's defensive prowess, particularly in encounters against Trousdale over recent years, earns commendation from Coach Satterfield, underscoring his proficiency in the strategic aspects of the game. John McNeal's track record of success across multiple sports affords him undeniable merit, though the prospect of his acceptance, if offered, remains uncertain. Chad Evitts, a former NFL luminary, presents a unique opportunity, recognized keenly by Mr. Satterfield, to infuse our program with elite expertise and experience. Matt Dyer, revered for his contributions during the regular season, faces scrutiny for his playoff performances, a dichotomy that weighs upon Clint's evaluation. Chuck Gentry, endorsed by Dr. Satterfield, embodies the promise of transformative leadership, drawing parallels to his past triumphs in revitalizing programs akin to ours. Clint extols BJ West's astute management at the middle school echelon, where his strategic maneuver of strategically calibrating the team's schedule to optimize performance stands as a testament to his sagacity and acumen in navigating competitive dynamics. In conclusion, the deliberations surrounding our prospective leadership remain nuanced and multifaceted, underscoring the significance of this decision in shaping the future trajectory of our esteemed institution.  
×
  • Create New...