Jump to content

Should referee work his Alma Mater?


ogor
 Share

Recommended Posts

I am questioning an official's ethical and professional obligation to remove himself from a "potential" biased situation which is required by the TSSAA and an official's responsibilities.

 

The only emphasis I made was a question- "Should a referee umpire is alma mater?" which is a valid question and has gotten plenty of valid answers - all NO.

 

I have a lot more respect for someone that understood what the word bias means and was able to remove themselves from those situations (expecially when it is required for their position).

 

Your explanation that you could care less about your alma mater above is a perfect example of bias. Denial, ignoring information that conflicts with your own beliefs and past. Someone attempting to explain how impartial and unbiased they are can be funny sometimes. I assume you get picked for every jury duty you attend :D Despite your extreme ability to have no predetermined perceptions (feelings) due to your past life experiences - as a professional, would you umpire or referee your alma mater?

 

I am still not sure if you answered the original question of this thread. :angry:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 27
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I just said I wouldn't have a problem officiating a game in which my alma mater is participating. I probably wouldn't 'choose' that game, but CHS's participation would not prevent me from calling a fair game. Calls, even judgement calls, are split second decisions that anyone that has ever officiated learns how to make based on the information in front of them. If you are professional in your endeavors, you make the call without regard to who is playing. I would feel obligated to tell my assignor that one of the team's is my alma mater. Based on his knowledge of my officiating skills and my integrity, I'd expect him to assign me accordingly.

 

I contend that the reason for the rule is the perception of bias by fans. My points were that there could be any number of reasons a person might be biased. Professionals have an ethical responsibility to do the right thing regardless. Officials will blow a call in any game. To suggest that they'll blow more calls when their alma mater is involved just would not be the case in my opinion. If officials were that easily swayed, they shouldn't be calling games in the first place. Other officials wouldn't want to work with those that are blowing obvious calls in their alma mater (or any other school's) favor.

 

It's no surprise to me that the average fan out there that's never officiated at this level would have such a dim view of officials. I don't even know the guy you are questioning, but I take it from this thread, that you didn't get the response you desired on the first take and you decided to take a more generic route. That doesn't change facts. Officials can't afford to be biased and expect to keep officiating very long. I can tell you from experience that officials want a well called game and they don't care what the outcome is so long as they've done their job to the best of their ability.

 

:angry: I have been picked for every jury duty I've ever participated in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the insight and response. Actually this topic came up on another thread, and I attempted to enlighten some folks on the responsiblities of officiating and the problems associated with this situation, including the lack of ownership the TSSAA takes with regard to officials. I was asked to start another thread and did. No dim view of officials here, too much time spent playing and coaching over the years not to respect these guys and the garbage they put up with. Thanks again for the insight and friendly debate. :thumb:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm the one that suggested the new thread, and for the reason that the referee in question and the issues in question had nothing to do with the game being discussed in the thread.

 

Someone made a comment about questionable officiating in the game, to which another made an assumption that perhaps the same referee worked his alma mater (and he didn't).

 

This is a fair discussion. It just had nothing to do with the game last Friday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • They’ve both gotten worse. I’ve seen enough games to know that. 
    • The only two transfers that Bearden has gotten that went on to play college football were a defensive back from Karnes, who transferred here way before the new coaching staff got here, and a running back from Carter, who went on to play at Maryville College. Both players received those offers while at Bearden, and both players got a diploma from Bearden High School. Therefore, they are Bearden kids, and you can’t do anything about that.   The transfer from Seymour didn’t win the job, what do you expect two quarterbacks to start at the same time? He played great on JV when he could stay healthy, and when he came in on varsity, he did great. The quarterback position is definitely going to be in good hands when the current starting quarterback leaves, but until then, they’re just going to be battling it out like every good quarterback competition does. The current starting quarterback has his flaws, and that is in the pass game, but what he doesn’t have flaws is running and scrambling, and if you go back and watch any game, which I’m sure you didn’t watch any, we used him very often, and when we needed a deep ball, we brought in the transfer from Seymour. The starting quarterback last year will be a senior this year, and the Seymour transfer will be a junior, so the Seymour transfer is definitely going to get his spotlight. He may even win the job this year. Football isn’t about who the newspaper thinks is the best kid. The best kid in the position will win the starting job, and I trust the coaching staff more than a newspaper or article to pick my starting QB.
    • I mean, we’ve only gotten two transfers that went on to play college football, one who went to UT Martin came his second semester junior year before the new coaching staff was here, and the other one went on to play at Maryville College, in which I don’t believe he had any interest prior to transferring.
    • An FYI: To see how an opponent has done against another opponent since 2001- go to the game by clicking on one of the teams. Click the G beside the game. For example, Milan: The info will show you the previous matchups and other info.
    • All these college signees went yo other schools for 3 years, were getting college offers then transferred to Bearden. It’s not like this staff did much to develop them.    The BBall coaches son and the Seymour transfer were some of the most talented QBs in the region, and you guys developed them into QBs who might complete one pass a game. 
×
  • Create New...