Jump to content

AC at Clinton


thekidd0086
 Share

Recommended Posts

Darian Stone was clearly the player of this game, but I don't know how you can look at the entire 48 minutes and say that Clinton "out played AC in every phase." I just didn't see that. Clinton dominated the turnover battle, and that's about it.....

 

Clintons offense was better, 35 points to 21, Clinton no picks, ac 4 and a fumble.. and all of the turnovers were caused by Clinton making place, non were unforced... Clinton's d was better giving up 21 points ac 35 points, ac forced 0 turnovers, Clinton forced 6.. I would say ac won the special teams battle due to kick off returns, but i forgot that Frazier had a big return and stone did a great job of punting all night, and ac had a big fumble on special teams so I'm giving the edge to Clinton... thats why I say they won in all aspects of the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 184
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

ILL give you the clock, believe me we know the feeling its happened to us before this season, and i thought they got the calls right all night, yes it was offensive PI, the receiver was trying to save your QB from throwing his 5th pick and pushed down our safety before he could pick it off.

Better check the tape, d123. The receiver was looking at the ball when the defender stepped into the receiver's path. But oh well. It's over.

 

I've tried to make sense of the potential match-ups but can't. Why do you think we'll see Catholic? The guy on coachT who is making prognostications -- randymc -- seems to think we'll be in quad 1 with Powell and a bunch of upper East Tennessee teams. I simply don't know. If it is Catholic, then yes, we would like to play them again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Darian Stone was clearly the player of this game, but I don't know how you can look at the entire 48 minutes and say that Clinton "out played AC in every phase." I just didn't see that. Clinton dominated the turnover battle, and that's about it.....

 

Clintons offense was better, 35 points to 21, Clinton no picks, ac 4 and a fumble.. and all of the turnovers were caused by Clinton making place, non were unforced... Clinton's d was better giving up 21 points ac 35 points, ac forced 0 turnovers, Clinton forced 6.. I would say ac won the special teams battle due to kick off returns, but i forgot that Frazier had a big return and stone did a great job of punting all night, and ac had a big fumble on special teams so I'm giving the edge to Clinton... thats why I say they won in all aspects of the game.

I agree, Clinton dominated the turnover battle and they won the scoreboard battle (obviously, the most important battle of all). But don't forget, AC outgained Clinton 375-345 in total offense. It's moot now, but to say that Clinton dominated both defensively and offensively just isn't the case. Just look at the stat sheet. Minus the turnovers, this was a very close game, both offensively and defensively.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really think AC will be in Quad two with Clinton, and if thats the case you guys will prop be a three seed, could be a four but i doubt it, im thinking 3.. and catholic could be a five or six but im thinking six cause the way they have been playing they will prob. lose to bearden tonight and the three seed will play the six seed.. thats why Im thinking you guys will end up playing Catholic...

 

and for all the comments about Clinton out playing AC which they did.. AC had too huge plays on offense, on the long screen pass that lead to your first score which was if I remember right like 70+ yards, and the long pass play in the fourth quarter that covered 83 yards( when our safety fell down when he had great position) so of your 375 yards 153 came on two big plays.. other than that we contained your offense... but AC made one huge mistake all night long. and like i have been saying all week long, not running the football will hurt AC because i noticed all night that Clinton had 5 sometimes four players in the box and yet AC just had to throw the ball... when they did run the ball with 22 who i feel is your best football player, success followed but once again you guys try and throw the ball a bit to much sometimes... Again Clinton won the game and won in all three phases..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As far as the quadrants, it all comes down to David Crockett for quadrant 1. If Crockett gets a wild card, quadrant 1 will have:

 

Tennessee High

Sullivan South

Daniel Boone

Morristown East

Morristown West

Seymour

Powell

David Crockett

 

If Crockett doesn't get the wild card, somebody else from down that way will be in quadrant 1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really think AC will be in Quad two with Clinton, and if thats the case you guys will prop be a three seed, could be a four but i doubt it, im thinking 3.. and catholic could be a five or six but im thinking six cause the way they have been playing they will prob. lose to bearden tonight and the three seed will play the six seed.. thats why Im thinking you guys will end up playing Catholic...

 

and for all the comments about Clinton out playing AC which they did.. AC had too huge plays on offense, on the long screen pass that lead to your first score which was if I remember right like 70+ yards, and the long pass play in the fourth quarter that covered 83 yards( when our safety fell down when he had great position) so of your 375 yards 153 came on two big plays.. other than that we contained your offense... but AC made one huge mistake all night long. and like i have been saying all week long, not running the football will hurt AC because i noticed all night that Clinton had 5 sometimes four players in the box and yet AC just had to throw the ball... when they did run the ball with 22 who i feel is your best football player, success followed but once again you guys try and throw the ball a bit to much sometimes... Again Clinton won the game and won in all three phases..

What Clinton didnt have any big pass plays? Yes they did !! You have a very strange way to talk trash the only thing you can trash talk about is Clinton won thaks to the turnovers and sloppy feild conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

space 3 where in my post did i say AC didn't have any big plays... never did. I said you had two really big plays that were a bulk of your total offense... :roflol: Awww lets cry about the sloppy field,and all the turnovers :lol: big deal the field affected Clinton too and the turnovers o yea we didn't turn the ball over I forgot, sorry.. stop crying because you got beat by a better Clinton team without its best player, and yea u did turn the ball over and who caused that to happen, :lol: i think Clinton... We will see you again on whatever field you ac people want , and Clinton will do the same thing we did last night and thats win, win , win, heck thats all we have done this whole year, beat each and every team that tries to line up against us... :roflol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

space 3 where did in my post did i say AC didn't have any big plays... never did. I said you had two really big plays that were a bulk of your total offense... :roflol: Awww lets cry about the sloppy field,and all the turnovers :roflol: big deal the field affected Clinton too and the turnovers o yea we didn't turn the ball over I forgot, sorry.. stop crying because you got beat by a better Clinton team without its best player, and yea u did turn the ball over and who caused that to happen, :lol: i think Clinton... We will see you again on whatever field you ac people want , and Clinton will do the same thing we did last night and thats win, win , win, heck thats all we have done this whole year, beat each and every team that tries to line up against us... :lol:

No one is crying, and certainly no one is trying to take anything away from Clinton. I debated even bringing this up because I knew some fan would take this the wrong way. The better team won the football game, period. I'm not a fan of either team; however, I was simply stating that I didn't think Clinton dominated the game in every phase. If they had, the final score would have been something like 35-7 or 42-20. Big plays or not, when an opponent outgains the winning team (and the winning team scores with 1:19 to play to seal it), I wouldn't consider that outplaying the other team in every phase of the game. The Colts-Dolphins game from a month ago is a great example.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

space 3 where did in my post did i say AC didn't have any big plays... never did. I said you had two really big plays that were a bulk of your total offense... :thumb: Awww lets cry about the sloppy field,and all the turnovers :angry: big deal the field affected Clinton too and the turnovers o yea we didn't turn the ball over I forgot, sorry.. stop crying because you got beat by a better Clinton team without its best player, and yea u did turn the ball over and who caused that to happen, :huh: i think Clinton... We will see you again on whatever field you ac people want , and Clinton will do the same thing we did last night and thats win, win , win, heck thats all we have done this whole year, beat each and every team that tries to line up against us... :D

No one is crying, and certainly no one is trying to take anything away from Clinton. I debated even bringing this up because I knew some fan would take this the wrong way. The better team won the football game, period. I'm not a fan of either team; however, I was simply stating that I didn't think Clinton dominated the game in every phase. If they had, the final score would have been something like 35-7 or 42-20. Big plays or not, when an opponent outgains the winning team (and the winning team scores with 1:19 to play to seal it), I wouldn't consider that outplaying the other team in every phase of the game. The Colts-Dolphins game from a month ago is a great example.

I said that because you said all are yards came from big plays . I said clintons yards came from big plays too. Congrats to Clinton but after this year you guys are loosing a bunch of players. So live it up! You all were suppose to kill us LOL . Didnt happen and we outgain you in total offense. So in joy it while you can!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • OK, well, that’s because two quarterbacks can’t start. That’s football 101. The main quarterback won the starting job, so he was on varsity, and the Seymour transfer did not win the starting job. He played some varsity. He was mainly junior varsity, and he balled out when healthy, so for the starting quarterback who’s been starting varsity since his freshman year, if you have any form of proof that he’s gotten worse, somehow, whether that means stats or whatnot, please feel free to share.
    • They’ve both gotten worse. I’ve seen enough games to know that. 
    • The only two transfers that Bearden has gotten that went on to play college football were a defensive back from Karnes, who transferred here way before the new coaching staff got here, and a running back from Carter, who went on to play at Maryville College. Both players received those offers while at Bearden, and both players got a diploma from Bearden High School. Therefore, they are Bearden kids, and you can’t do anything about that.   The transfer from Seymour didn’t win the job, what do you expect two quarterbacks to start at the same time? He played great on JV when he could stay healthy, and when he came in on varsity, he did great. The quarterback position is definitely going to be in good hands when the current starting quarterback leaves, but until then, they’re just going to be battling it out like every good quarterback competition does. The current starting quarterback has his flaws, and that is in the pass game, but what he doesn’t have flaws is running and scrambling, and if you go back and watch any game, which I’m sure you didn’t watch any, we used him very often, and when we needed a deep ball, we brought in the transfer from Seymour. The starting quarterback last year will be a senior this year, and the Seymour transfer will be a junior, so the Seymour transfer is definitely going to get his spotlight. He may even win the job this year. Football isn’t about who the newspaper thinks is the best kid. The best kid in the position will win the starting job, and I trust the coaching staff more than a newspaper or article to pick my starting QB.
    • I mean, we’ve only gotten two transfers that went on to play college football, one who went to UT Martin came his second semester junior year before the new coaching staff was here, and the other one went on to play at Maryville College, in which I don’t believe he had any interest prior to transferring.
    • An FYI: To see how an opponent has done against another opponent since 2001- go to the game by clicking on one of the teams. Click the G beside the game. For example, Milan: The info will show you the previous matchups and other info.
×
  • Create New...