Jump to content

Baylor v.s. McCallie, This year should be good


bigblu1
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 187
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Then under Silverpie's "all six-pointers are equal" criteria, it looks like Baylor would still have won had Duncan been able to get the extra two team points awarded for a pin at 152 and the score ended at 38-38. There were no a., b. or c. For d., matches were even at 7-7. Move to e. and each had 3 falls, each had one injury default, but Baylor had the only forfeit. So, in the event the match had been tied at the end, it looks like the forfeit at 112 would have decided the match for Baylor. Thankfully, due to the the Baylor 152 avoiding getting pinned by Duncan, it did not have come to that.

 

Exactly Right

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then under Silverpie's "all six-pointers are equal" criteria, it looks like Baylor would still have won had Duncan been able to get the extra two team points awarded for a pin at 152 and the score ended at 38-38. There were no a., b. or c. For d., matches were even at 7-7. Move to e. and each had 3 falls, each had one injury default, but Baylor had the only forfeit. So, in the event the match had been tied at the end, it looks like the forfeit at 112 would have decided the match for Baylor. Thankfully, due to the the Baylor 152 avoiding getting pinned by Duncan, it did not have come to that.

 

Exactly Right

 

It just totally baffles me that everyone is talking like Duncan failed at something. Fact is, he won his match. He tried to get the pin, but Craig refused to lay down. It happens. But everyone seems to forget that he won his match, and did his part. Bonus points are just that. This is just a child, and everyone is acting like he failed at something. My goodness, that is just amazing.

 

Geez, if you ask me, the forfeit at 112 is what should be talked about. Take that away, and give Baylor a decision and you have yourself a different winner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your right 2blLeg. The problem lies with the fact that the blue squad has such a storied history of the forfeit that folks have come to expect them. Also you must consider that great success brings great expectations, for Duncan and everyone else. Sort of wrestling's double edged sword.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your right 2blLeg. The problem lies with the fact that the blue squad has such a storied history of the forfeit that folks have come to expect them.

 

Understand that. But, if you want to look for a big reason for the loss, than that is really the only place to look. Just a bad decision on their part to give up 6 without a fight. It's definitly not Duncan's way of winning.

 

To me, the credit goes to Craig for fighting out of several pinning opportunities. Could have sworn the cradle in the 1st period was going to get the mat slapped. But dang, that kid had guts to hang in there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would've Could've Should've.......

Certainly Duncan won his match, win is a win is a win, several other things also

could have changed the direction of this match. Now I don't think anybody was saying that about

last years match. McCallie put up a much improved performance.

Why put weight on the shoulder of one kid, just because he is a stud and was expected to pin.

You can change the should of's ten different ways in this match with ten different out comes.

It was a much improved performance that made it fun to watch, I think we will all get a couple of more

years here with close good match ups..... :popcorneater:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • Oh, I’m sure you did. Maybe you heard just a rumor, but considering we have a football practice field and a soccer field that’s frequently used for lacrosse games and practices, I highly doubt it. Let me change that. I know for a fact that didn’t happen.   Glad you finally stopped attacking a bunch of high school students, but still obsessed with the coaching staff for some unknown reason, even though you could name more than three (at most) coaches without looking it up. But now come up with something else.
    • You really mean the Price twin boys and Lyin Larry.
    • Now that wouldn’t surprise me a bit. That has been going on heavily since the days of Larry Kerr @ AC. One of the major reasons CC has never really had much at all, barring about 2 seasons in football. AC milks it dry.
    • Interesting how quite it is. Rumors are going around that Anderson County is being looked at by TSSAA for recruiting violations with the Campbell County transfers. 
    • I heard from a member of the teaching staff that there has been a dispute over use of the game field between football, and girls lacrosse team. Girls had a game and wanted to warm up and football coaches did want to leave. The football coaches came down hard with some bad vulgar language and the girls lacrosse backed down. What a classy act BHS athletics has become.
×
  • Create New...