Jump to content

Projected Playoff Bracket


WesVLT
 Share

Recommended Posts

Below is the projected playoff bracket if the DII-AA playoffs were starting Friday. Where teams are tied and have not played, I projected the winner based on common opponents.

 

TOP HALF

1W MUS

BYE

 

4W Briarcrest

5EM McCallie

 

2EM Baylor

BYE

 

3W Christian Brothers

7EM MBA

 

BOTTOM HALF

1EM Brentwood Academy

BYE

 

4EM BGA

6EM Father Ryan

 

2W St. Benedict

BYE

 

3 EM Ensworth

8 EM Pope John Paul II

Edited by WesVLT
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 28
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

So there are 7 teams in the East/Middle region and 2 byes for top 2 teams.

There are 4 teams in the West region and 2 byes for the top 2 teams.

Wouldn't it be fair to give the E/M region 3 byes and the West region just one bye?

A west team could get a bye with a 2 and 2 win/loss record. A E/M team could go 5 and 1 and could have to play the 1st round.

Better yet....only 2 teams from the west should be eligible for playoffs and 4 teams from the E/M eligible to qualify for playoffs. This "let everyone in playoffs" is not a good setup. I believe it effects teams and coaches in the regular season. The teams need a goal to try and achieve during the regular season. Without the playoff reward goal, teams tend to play differently. (IMO) But the T$$AA loves the extra playoff money ($10 admission,I think) so lets play as many games as possible. Then in December lets make DII teams play the championship on a Thursday and give the weekend dates to DI. Those folks from Chattanooga and Memphis shouldn't mind taking a couple of days off from work to go to game.

Hey TSSAA - How about rotating the weekend championship dates every year between DII and DI?

Edited by shakinthefat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So there are 7 teams in the East/Middle region and 2 byes for top 2 teams.

There are 4 teams in the West region and 2 byes for the top 2 teams.

Wouldn't it be fair to give the E/M region 3 byes and the West region just one bye?

A west team could get a bye with a 2 and 2 win/loss record. A E/M team could go 5 and 1 and could have to play the 1st round.

Better yet....only 2 teams from the west should be eligible for playoffs and 4 teams from the E/M eligible to qualify for playoffs. This "let everyone in playoffs" is not a good setup. I believe it effects teams and coaches in the regular season. The teams need a goal to try and achieve during the regular season. Without the playoff reward goal, teams tend to play differently. (IMO) But the T$$AA loves the extra playoff money ($10 admission,I think) so lets play as many games as possible. Then in December lets make DII teams play the championship on a Thursday and give the weekend dates to DI. Those folks from Chattanooga and Memphis shouldn't mind taking a couple of days off from work to go to game.

Hey TSSAA - How about rotating the weekend championship dates every year between DII and DI?

I don't always agree with everything you post, but I think in this case you're dead on. The money issue is the driving force on a lot of really bad decisions, starting with the idea that a relatively small state can somehow justify 8 state champions. And the whole idea of a state championship from a pool of 11 teams is beyond ludicrous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Below is the projected playoff bracket if the DII-AA playoffs were starting Friday. Where teams are tied and have not played, I projected the winner based on common opponents.

 

TOP HALF

1W MUS

BYE

 

4W Briarcrest

5EM McCallie

 

2EM Baylor

BYE

 

3W Christian Brothers

7EM MBA

 

BOTTOM HALF

1EM Brentwood Academy

BYE

 

4EM BGA

6EM Father Ryan

 

2W St. Benedict

BYE

 

3 EM Ensworth

8 EM Pope John Paul II

BA vs. E is like LSU vs Bama....might be a "classic" rematch. Would hate to see the buzzards in the finals again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't always agree with everything you post, but I think in this case you're dead on. The money issue is the driving force on a lot of really bad decisions, starting with the idea that a relatively small state can somehow justify 8 state champions. And the whole idea of a state championship from a pool of 11 teams is beyond ludicrous.

It is ridiculous that every team makes the playoffs. If you are a bad team don't you just want the season to be over rather than having to play a BA, Ensworth, or Baylor a second time? Your 6 team scenario makes a lot of sense and I would have the championship game November 17th (somewhere other than Cookeville). Many of these kids wrestle or play basketball so would benefit those athletes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since DII-AA is one of the deepest leagues in the state, I propose allowing 8 teams into the playoffs -- 5 from East/Middle and 3 from the West. That places a premium on the regular season, cuts out the worst teams and still allows the top seed a relatively easy first game, depending on the depth of the league in a given year.

 

Not only is the current format watered down, but it also uses a disproportionate bye system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont know which bracket youre using but the 4w 5e should be in the bottom half and the 4e 6e should be in the top according to tssaa.org brackets. also, mba has no chance at being 7 when they already beat father ryan. they will be 5 or 6 depending on if they beat mccallie or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont know which bracket youre using but the 4w 5e should be in the bottom half and the 4e 6e should be in the top according to tssaa.org brackets. also, mba has no chance at being 7 when they already beat father ryan. they will be 5 or 6 depending on if they beat mccallie or not.

 

1) I copied the seeds directly from last year's TSSAA playoff bracket.

 

2) While MBA will likely be ahead of Father Ryan in the final standings, right now the Big Red is 1-4 and Ryan is 1-3. Thus, for now, Ryan is the higher seed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1) I copied the seeds directly from last year's TSSAA playoff bracket.

 

2) While MBA will likely be ahead of Father Ryan in the final standings, right now the Big Red is 1-4 and Ryan is 1-3. Thus, for now, Ryan is the higher seed.

Can't seem to get the phrase, "Rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic" out of my mind....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • Deja vu all over again, 7 yrs apart. SMDH Does anybody talk to each other?
    • OK, well, that’s because two quarterbacks can’t start. That’s football 101. The main quarterback won the starting job, so he was on varsity, and the Seymour transfer did not win the starting job. He played some varsity. He was mainly junior varsity, and he balled out when healthy, so for the starting quarterback who’s been starting varsity since his freshman year, if you have any form of proof that he’s gotten worse, somehow, whether that means stats or whatnot, please feel free to share.
    • They’ve both gotten worse. I’ve seen enough games to know that. 
    • The only two transfers that Bearden has gotten that went on to play college football were a defensive back from Karnes, who transferred here way before the new coaching staff got here, and a running back from Carter, who went on to play at Maryville College. Both players received those offers while at Bearden, and both players got a diploma from Bearden High School. Therefore, they are Bearden kids, and you can’t do anything about that.   The transfer from Seymour didn’t win the job, what do you expect two quarterbacks to start at the same time? He played great on JV when he could stay healthy, and when he came in on varsity, he did great. The quarterback position is definitely going to be in good hands when the current starting quarterback leaves, but until then, they’re just going to be battling it out like every good quarterback competition does. The current starting quarterback has his flaws, and that is in the pass game, but what he doesn’t have flaws is running and scrambling, and if you go back and watch any game, which I’m sure you didn’t watch any, we used him very often, and when we needed a deep ball, we brought in the transfer from Seymour. The starting quarterback last year will be a senior this year, and the Seymour transfer will be a junior, so the Seymour transfer is definitely going to get his spotlight. He may even win the job this year. Football isn’t about who the newspaper thinks is the best kid. The best kid in the position will win the starting job, and I trust the coaching staff more than a newspaper or article to pick my starting QB.
    • I mean, we’ve only gotten two transfers that went on to play college football, one who went to UT Martin came his second semester junior year before the new coaching staff was here, and the other one went on to play at Maryville College, in which I don’t believe he had any interest prior to transferring.
×
  • Create New...