Revolution of offenses today

[PassiveAggressive]

MAN IF PARKER AND BUNION HAD ONE MORE YEAR......TO RUN THE VEER

THEY WERE BURNING RUBBER ON DEM OWLS DEFENSE LOL...

THANK GOODNESS THE QB LOVE TO THROW TO OUR DB'S #LOP

[fooseball96]

Cummings and the staff have been all over going to coaching clinics to get better familiar with the offense. Our Qb has been to Woffords camps and several others to try to learn some things. This year is gonna be a learning progress. But we definitely have the dogs to run it once we learn it. But it's definitely gonna be a learning process

Edited April 21, 2015 by fooseball96

[PassiveAggressive]

Modern day spread offenses trace their roots back to those old school offenses you mentioned, they just dress them up and put the QB in the gun. A common misconception is that the shotgun offense can't be a smash mouth style of offense. Anyone who has watched auburn or Ohio state over the past few seasons wouldn't call their offenses soft.

SHOTGUN IS GOOD, JUST DONT LIKE IT IN THE REDZONE. ..BUT I RECALL THAT AUBURN AND OHIO ST. HAD SOME STUD RB'S THAT COULD RUN IT IN.

[fooseball96]

MAN IF PARKER AND BUNION HAD ONE MORE YEAR......TO RUN THE VEER

THEY WERE BURNING RUBBER ON DEM OWLS DEFENSE LOL...

THANK GOODNESS THE QB LOVE TO THROW TO OUR DB'S #LOP

We missed Herick last year lol to say the least

[PassiveAggressive]

Cummings and the staff have been all over going to coaching clinics to get better familiar with the offense. Our Qb has been to Woffords camps and several others to try to learn some things. This year is gonna be a learning progress. But we definitely have the dogs to run it once we learn it. But it's definitely gonna be a learning process

I BELIEVE THAT FOOSE. ....THAT'S WHY WE GETTING OUR DOGS READY TO STOP IT.

[BigPoppaPump]

I'm more of old school offensive guy. (Veer, wing-t, option, smashmouth etc.) But today it seems that more coaches have shyed away from that style. It seems that most systems now days run a spread. I guess it does better prepare the players somewhat for the next level. But my question is.....why have people went away from old school football. I hate going to games and seeing a 1st and 10 and teams come out in a shotgun. Any body else feel this way? What do u guys think? To me it seems offense have gotten more fancy yet more confusing. Just get in the end zone!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

How in the world could you question why a team would spread it out and then also say, "get in the end zone"?  The highest scoring teams in the world are all spread.  Why do they do it?  Because it works!  Why play football in a phone booth if you can get fast guys in space?  Some schools just don't recruit big.  Some high schools just don't have big, power guys.  Why be stubborn and refuse to change if it suits your strengths?  Can the veer work? Sure (Carson Newman, De La Salle, Knox West).  Can the I Backfield running power work?  Sure (Stanford).  Can spread work?  Sure (Oregon, Ohio State, UCLA, Ole Miss, Texas A.M.)

 

Also, in case you actually watch blocking schemes, your national champion Ohio State Buckeyes are a "spread" team that runs the same thing a lot of you Power Guys want (Power, Counters, etc.). 

[PassiveAggressive]

THE WORST WINGT IVE SEEN RAN WAS BY STONE MEMORIAL. ..PERSONEL TOO SLOW.

I THINK JACKSON HAD ABOUT 15 TACKLES THAT NIGHT.

THE BEST WINGT. ..YAL ALREADY KNOW... WONT HAPPENS AGAIN THOUGH #LOP

[fooseball96]

How in the world could you question why a team would spread it out and then also say, "get in the end zone"? The highest scoring teams in the world are all spread. Why do they do it? Because it works! Why play football in a phone booth if you can get fast guys in space? Some schools just don't recruit big. Some high schools just don't have big, power guys. Why be stubborn and refuse to change if it suits your strengths? Can the veer work? Sure (Carson Newman, De La Salle, Knox West). Can the I Backfield running power work? Sure (Stanford). Can spread work? Sure (Oregon, Ohio State, UCLA, Ole Miss, Texas A.M.)

 

Also, in case you actually watch blocking schemes, your national champion Ohio State Buckeyes are a "spread" team that runs the same thing a lot of you Power Guys want (Power, Counters, etc.).

I understand everything u just said and everybody knows about what Ohio st did. I'm just saying I don't like the screens, draws, that type stuff. I'm a former offensive lineman. I wanna put my fingers in the dirt and hit somebody Edited April 21, 2015 by fooseball96

[workinprogress]

People have the misconceptions that spread teams don't use traditional concepts. Not true at all. It's all about numbers. If you can make the defense cover the entire field then running the veer, triple option, iso, and trap become much easier. Add in the jet motion and some screens and you have a winner.

[PassiveAggressive]

How in the world could you question why a team would spread it out and then also say, "get in the end zone"?  The highest scoring teams in the world are all spread.  Why do they do it?  Because it works!  Why play football in a phone booth if you can get fast guys in space?  Some schools just don't recruit big.  Some high schools just don't have big, power guys.  Why be stubborn and refuse to change if it suits your strengths?  Can the veer work? Sure (Carson Newman, De La Salle, Knox West).  Can the I Backfield running power work?  Sure (Stanford).  Can spread work?  Sure (Oregon, Ohio State, UCLA, Ole Miss, Texas A.M.)

 

Also, in case you actually watch blocking schemes, your national champion Ohio State Buckeyes are a "spread" team that runs the same thing a lot of you Power Guys want (Power, Counters, etc.).

 

CHANGE IS GOOD SIR.. WHATEVER WORKS FOR YOUR PERSONEL. CAN YOU NAME A NEXT LEVEL WINGT TEAM..?

[qb#7]

CHANGE IS GOOD SIR.. WHATEVER WORKS FOR YOUR PERSONEL. CAN YOU NAME A NEXT LEVEL WINGT TEAM..?

Auburn, Clemson, SMU and until last year Tulsa

[BigPoppaPump]

Auburn, Clemson, SMU and until last year Tulsa

 

you talking about Wing-T concepts? Because yeah, they run some Wing-T concepts.  None of those teams are in the true Wing-T though.