Jump to content

White House Football


Devil21
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, BooWhoWiseMan said:

Not sure how a team that went 0-10 last year can all of a sudden be "loaded" this year.  If they played the same schedule as last year I bet they would be a 5-5 team at best.

At this point you might just be trolling me lol but whatever.  There were a lot of juniors and a few sophomores on this team that played big roles and some of them started last year too.  I think a year of growth and experience makes a huge difference especially sophomore to junior year.  Plus number 11 wasn't there last year either and he's really good.  And as far as the schedule goes we probably don't beat pearl, but the rest of the games are definitely winnable for this years team.  Of course this is all just opinion.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Copacanobra13 said:

At this point you might just be trolling me lol but whatever.  There were a lot of juniors and a few sophomores on this team that played big roles and some of them started last year too.  I think a year of growth and experience makes a huge difference especially sophomore to junior year.  Plus number 11 wasn't there last year either and he's really good.  And as far as the schedule goes we probably don't beat pearl, but the rest of the games are definitely winnable for this years team.  Of course this is all just opinion.  

Not trolling...just having a discussion.  I appreciate your passion even though I don't agree.  I believe that Porter and most high school coaches work extremely hard to build a program that young men can be proud of.  They spend hours upon hours away from families for pennies an hour.  In today's day and age spoiled kids and parents are ruining high school sports.  Hate to see a classy guy like Porter have peewee daddy coaches question his knowledge. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BooWhoWiseMan said:

Not trolling...just having a discussion.  I appreciate your passion even though I don't agree.  I believe that Porter and most high school coaches work extremely hard to build a program that young men can be proud of.  They spend hours upon hours away from families for pennies an hour.  In today's day and age spoiled kids and parents are ruining high school sports.  Hate to see a classy guy like Porter have peewee daddy coaches question his knowledge. 

Well hopefully I'm not a dad lol and I'm definitely not a coach.  Just a former player who has talked to a lot of other former players and coaches that agree with me.  

I think you and eers are taking what I am saying the wrong way.  Me questioning his coaching ability does not equate to me questioning his character.  He is a class act and I have a lot of respect for coach porter! But that doesn't mean I'm not allowed to criticize him.  

I think coach does a good job. And if the goal is to make it to the 2nd and 3rd round every year, then he's doing a great job.  I just think there's been enough talent at White House over the years for the goal to be set much higher than that.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Copacanobra13 said:

Well hopefully I'm not a dad lol and I'm definitely not a coach.  Just a former player who has talked to a lot of other former players and coaches that agree with me.  

I think you and eers are taking what I am saying the wrong way.  Me questioning his coaching ability does not equate to me questioning his character.  He is a class act and I have a lot of respect for coach porter! But that doesn't mean I'm not allowed to criticize him.  

I think coach does a good job. And if the goal is to make it to the 2nd and 3rd round every year, then he's doing a great job.  I just think there's been enough talent at White House over the years for the goal to be set much higher than that.  

Look outside the bubble of the teams you play during the year and realize the teams you're losing to in the playoffs have a lot more athletes, year in and year out. Truth is, it's usually not about the Xs and Os, but the Jimmys and Joes. I believe 2nd and 3rd round is pretty solid for the athletes I've seen in WH over the last 15 years.  JMO, but since I'm a douche and all, I'm sure it's just trolling. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, eers said:

Look outside the bubble of the teams you play during the year and realize the teams you're losing to in the playoffs have a lot more athletes, year in and year out. Truth is, it's usually not about the Xs and Os, but the Jimmys and Joes. I believe 2nd and 3rd round is pretty solid for the athletes I've seen in WH over the last 15 years.  JMO, but since I'm a douche and all, I'm sure it's just trolling. 

out of all the former players I've talked to, I've never had one that disagreed with me.  I'm sure they're out there but I haven't met them.  It's only been people outside of the program that think I'm lying or something lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Copacanobra13 said:

out of all the former players I've talked to, I've never had one that disagreed with me.  I'm sure they're out there but I haven't met them.  It's only been people outside of the program that think I'm lying or something lol

In a typical year, White House doesn't have athletes to compete beyond the 2nd or 3rd round. To believe they do is to be blinded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, eers said:

In a typical year, White House doesn't have athletes to compete beyond the 2nd or 3rd round. To believe they do is to be blinded.

I already agreed that White House doesn't have the athletes year in and year out.  I said that there are a few years however where they have had the athletes to win state. 98,04,08, and this year too considering we beat Springfield in the regular season.  And I know I know, Springfields super heroes got injured against us.  You could probably throw a couple other years in there too, but I say definitely those three and this year.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Copacanobra13 said:

I already agreed that White House doesn't have the athletes year in and year out.  I said that there are a few years however where they have had the athletes to win state. 98,04,08, and this year too considering we beat Springfield in the regular season.  And I know I know, Springfields super heroes got injured against us.  You could probably throw a couple other years in there too, but I say definitely those three and this year.  

That's just inaccurate. They had zero chance this year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, bigdawgtn said:

you had zero chance of getting to state this year. You got blown out at home against southside who got blown out by lexington and both of those teams would get torched by Haywood

Okay we beat Springfield and now they're in state, but whatever.  This discussion started because I said coach Porter underachieves with the talent he has because he is not a good coach and gets in the way.  Coach porter is a great guy, but it is what it is.  If someone who has actually been a part of the program that knows what their talking wants to refute that claim then there's a discussion to be had, but for people who have no clue what they're talking about when it comes to this topic it's pointless to continue.  Hopefully we'll have better luck next year, GO BDP!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Copacanobra13 said:

Okay we beat Springfield and now they're in state, but whatever.  This discussion started because I said coach Porter underachieves with the talent he has because he is not a good coach and gets in the way.  Coach porter is a great guy, but it is what it is.  If someone who has actually been a part of the program that knows what their talking wants to refute that claim then there's a discussion to be had, but for people who have no clue what they're talking about when it comes to this topic it's pointless to continue.  Hopefully we'll have better luck next year, GO BDP!!

i agree with you i never have thought he was a good coach

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Copacanobra13 said:

Okay we beat Springfield and now they're in state, but whatever.  This discussion started because I said coach Porter underachieves with the talent he has because he is not a good coach and gets in the way.  Coach porter is a great guy, but it is what it is.  If someone who has actually been a part of the program that knows what their talking wants to refute that claim then there's a discussion to be had, but for people who have no clue what they're talking about when it comes to this topic it's pointless to continue.  Hopefully we'll have better luck next year, GO BDP!!

They don't underachieve. The talent level really isn't what you believe it to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • A little confused.  What charter/prep schools made it to state in Baseball?  
    • Fortuitously encountering Clint amidst the ambience of Goodyear this morning sparked an impromptu yet intellectually stimulating conversation, wherein we engaged in a rigorous assessment of prospective candidates for the esteemed role of head football coach. Our discourse, characterized by its spontaneity and depth, led to the formulation of astute observations and discerning judgments regarding the suitability of various individuals for this pivotal position. Allow me to elucidate the fruits of our collaborative contemplation: This commentary endeavors to offer a discerning articulation of my subjective viewpoint, emphasizing a conscientious commitment to maintaining impartiality and refraining from any semblance of derogation directed towards individuals.  Those who possess meritorious qualifications for the esteemed head coaching role, delineated without hierarchical precedence, include: Rennard Woodmore, an esteemed alumnus of the Yellow Jackets, presents a magnificent pedigree, having held prominent positions in head coaching capacities across various regions. His pivotal role as a coordinator for teams contending for state championships further enhances his stature in the realm of football leadership. Kyle Gregory, erstwhile adorned in the resplendent gold insignia, though lacking direct head coaching experience, brings to the fore his invaluable insights garnered as a coordinator for esteemed teams, showcasing an acute understanding of the requisites for triumph whilst attired in the esteemed purple and gold regalia. Steven Jackson, whose contributions transcended mere clipboard duties under the tutelage of Kevin Creasy, emerges as an exceptional candidate for Trousdale County. His prior tenure and triumphs as an assistant coach underscore his suitability for the role. The sole drawback lies in his lack of affiliation with Trousdale County as an alumnus. Brandon Eden's extensive tenure within the chronicles of Trousdale County football, spanning a significant portion of its State Championships, coupled with his successful stints as a coordinator across diverse locales, underscores his candidacy despite a dearth of direct head coaching experience at the high school level. Davy Cothron, while beset by a modest playing career, has emerged as a luminary in offensive strategy, drawing parallels to the transformative appointment of Barker in 2015, thereby warranting consideration for his proven acumen in this realm. Joshua Hackett, notwithstanding his non-alumnus status, has left an indelible imprint across Middle Tennessee, distinguished by his adept curation of formidable defensive units as a coordinator at Watertown, albeit without direct head coaching experience. Kevin Creasy, the epitome of coaching prowess, merits an offer irrespective of his current inclinations, his unparalleled capacity to secure victories transcending geographical and institutional bounds, potentially extending to a role as Director of Schools should it align with his aspirations. Conversely, individuals who have not demonstrably earned the mantle of head coaching, enumerated without sequential precedence, encompass: Brad Waggoner David Barker Paul Pitts Jeremy Pruitt Clint Satterfield Robbie Atwood Wesley Satterfield Ben Johnson BJ West Whom do you all deem most fitting to assume the mantle of the next coach, and what rationale informs your choice? Conversely, whom do you perceive as ill-suited for the role, and what underpins your reasoning for their exclusion?
    • He's a Clinton fan.  But I wouldn't admit that either.  
    • Their any schedule out their for team camp?
    • This sums it all up to perfection.  
×
  • Create New...