Jump to content

Bradley visits Heritage


BarneySox2007
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, HHSFB10 said:

Heritage beat a much more talented south Doyle team last year they had no business playing with. That was mainly because heritage looked more disciplined and more prepared. 

No doubt better coaching played a part in Heritage's improvement. But now they are having a hard time convincing kids to compete every day at practice when the adults running the program ran from playing Alcoa.

All these kids know each other, they all talk.  When a kid knows his coaches/Admins run from competition in their backyard, those same adults have zero credibility in holding those kids accountable for competing hard at practice and in games.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Red Rebels said:

Being in 5A helped. They were in 5A when someone thought that a "Super 32" would help smaller schools. It had the opposite effect. It pushed better teams into smaller classifications. Farragut benefited with a championship in 5A. 

 

9 minutes ago, HSfootballfanatic12 said:

So, are you saying the coaching staff had nothing to do with it? It was strictly based on being 5A? I agree  that helped, but those Heritage teams weren't beating some of the teams they played on just talent alone. They weren't talented enough to do that. 

I said it helped. Being in 5A helped mask some talent deficiencies. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, 32hammer said:

No doubt better coaching played a part in Heritage's improvement. But now they are having a hard time convincing kids to compete every day at practice when the adults running the program ran from playing Alcoa.

All these kids know each other, they all talk.  When a kid knows his coaches/Admins run from competition in their backyard, those same adults have zero credibility in holding those kids accountable for competing hard at practice and in games.

 

What does heritage gain playing Alcoa? Playing a team and getting your teeth kicked in does nothing to improve the program. I understand the idea of playing the best teams  to make you better, but you shouldn’t play the  best of the best if you’re one of the worst. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, HHSFB10 said:

What does heritage gain playing Alcoa? Playing a team and getting your teeth kicked in does nothing to improve the program. I understand the idea of playing the best teams  to make you better, but you shouldn’t play the  best of the best if you’re one of the worst. 

Heritage and Wb played Alcoa for decades. Then decided to run away, take an easier route, avoid an obstacle, etc.

The kids know the adults are doing this, so the adults have zero credibility with the kids when they are trying to hold them accountable.

Its like a preacher that openly cheats on his wife with several women in the community try to preach about adultery to the families in the congregation of those same women.

You can't demand respect, accountability, hard work, commitment, Competition, from kids, when you blatantly don't practice some of those qualities yourself.

The kids hear from other kids that they are scared to compete, the adults actions verify what the other kids are telling them then the coaches have the nerve to get mad at the kids for not competing.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, 32hammer said:

Heritage and Wb played Alcoa for decades. Then decided to run away, take an easier route, avoid an obstacle, etc.

The kids know the adults are doing this, so the adults have zero credibility with the kids when they are trying to hold them accountable.

Its like a preacher that openly cheats on his wife with several women in the community try to preach about adultery to the families in the congregation of those same women.

You can't demand respect, accountability, hard work, commitment, Competition, from kids, when you blatantly don't practice some of those qualities yourself.

The kids hear from other kids that they are scared to compete, the adults actions verify what the other kids are telling them then the coaches have the nerve to get mad at the kids for not competing.

 

Well said!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 32hammer said:

Heritage and Wb played Alcoa for decades. Then decided to run away, take an easier route, avoid an obstacle, etc.

The kids know the adults are doing this, so the adults have zero credibility with the kids when they are trying to hold them accountable.

Its like a preacher that openly cheats on his wife with several women in the community try to preach about adultery to the families in the congregation of those same women.

You can't demand respect, accountability, hard work, commitment, Competition, from kids, when you blatantly don't practice some of those qualities yourself.

The kids hear from other kids that they are scared to compete, the adults actions verify what the other kids are telling them then the coaches have the nerve to get mad at the kids for not competing.

 

That’s not the case at all. There is no way a kid has thought to themselves, “hey I don’t have to work hard, and lose every game because we don’t play Alcoa”. Teams get better by playing similar teams that they can compete with. Heritage can’t play with Alcoa. Heritage had played Maryville year after year, and it hasn’t made heritage any better. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't mean to harp on this so much. But I get incredibly frustrated when adults do the wrong thing, then get mad at kids for doing the same thing.

Adult leaders should set the example, be above doubt and set the bar so high with their own code of conduct, work ethic and value system, that kids have no excuses but to be molded into better people.

I know how hard some teachers/staff work in schools to do this despite many parents failing to carry their weight, and when I see leaders that could really help reinforce these values bail out I get frustrated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, HHSFB10 said:

That’s not the case at all. There is no way a kid has thought to themselves, “hey I don’t have to work hard, and lose every game because we don’t play Alcoa”. Teams get better by playing similar teams that they can compete with. Heritage can’t play with Alcoa. Heritage had played Maryville year after year, and it hasn’t made heritage any better. 

Kids tell other kids, on social media, at youth groups, etc, you're coaches are scared to compete with us.

Kids see the evidence backs the statement up. Same coaches demand kids compete and work hard, but coaches have no credibility.

I've seen first hand at one school how a coach that kids know doesn't do the right thing destroys moral and sends the program into a tail spin.

Its hard to get teenagers to do the right thing, when adult role models don't, its almost impossible,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, 32hammer said:

Kids tell other kids, on social media, at youth groups, etc, you're coaches are scared to compete with us.

Kids see the evidence backs the statement up. Same coaches demand kids compete and work hard, but coaches have no credibility.

I've seen first hand at one school how a coach that kids know doesn't do the right thing destroys moral and sends the program into a tail spin.

Its hard to get teenagers to do the right thing, when adult role models don't, its almost impossible,

It’s true that when adults do the wrong things it’s impossible to get kids to do the right things. BUT, and this is a big but, heritage not playing Alcoa is not the wrong thing. It makes no sense for heritage to play them. They gain nothing from it. 

If I decide not to fight mike Tyson it doesn’t mean I’m running from competition, it means I know I’m not in the same league as Tyson and have no business fighting him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • Deja vu all over again, 7 yrs apart. SMDH Does anybody talk to each other?
    • OK, well, that’s because two quarterbacks can’t start. That’s football 101. The main quarterback won the starting job, so he was on varsity, and the Seymour transfer did not win the starting job. He played some varsity. He was mainly junior varsity, and he balled out when healthy, so for the starting quarterback who’s been starting varsity since his freshman year, if you have any form of proof that he’s gotten worse, somehow, whether that means stats or whatnot, please feel free to share.
    • They’ve both gotten worse. I’ve seen enough games to know that. 
    • The only two transfers that Bearden has gotten that went on to play college football were a defensive back from Karnes, who transferred here way before the new coaching staff got here, and a running back from Carter, who went on to play at Maryville College. Both players received those offers while at Bearden, and both players got a diploma from Bearden High School. Therefore, they are Bearden kids, and you can’t do anything about that.   The transfer from Seymour didn’t win the job, what do you expect two quarterbacks to start at the same time? He played great on JV when he could stay healthy, and when he came in on varsity, he did great. The quarterback position is definitely going to be in good hands when the current starting quarterback leaves, but until then, they’re just going to be battling it out like every good quarterback competition does. The current starting quarterback has his flaws, and that is in the pass game, but what he doesn’t have flaws is running and scrambling, and if you go back and watch any game, which I’m sure you didn’t watch any, we used him very often, and when we needed a deep ball, we brought in the transfer from Seymour. The starting quarterback last year will be a senior this year, and the Seymour transfer will be a junior, so the Seymour transfer is definitely going to get his spotlight. He may even win the job this year. Football isn’t about who the newspaper thinks is the best kid. The best kid in the position will win the starting job, and I trust the coaching staff more than a newspaper or article to pick my starting QB.
    • I mean, we’ve only gotten two transfers that went on to play college football, one who went to UT Martin came his second semester junior year before the new coaching staff was here, and the other one went on to play at Maryville College, in which I don’t believe he had any interest prior to transferring.
×
  • Create New...