South Pitt 6 transfers Create Discussion

[GHSblackhelmet]

1 hour ago, TheAmbassador said:

I won’t disagree with that at all. The longevity of the program at SP is what makes it so special. There has just been a slight paradigm shift so to speak in recent years with the reemergence of Greenback into regular state powerhouse talk. 

The late 80's early 90's Cherokees were a handful . The pre Satterfield days were a joke other than 67-68 I believe. The late 90's were bad as well. There have been several teams in the 2010's that should have been elite with the proper coaching but didn't have it. Fortunately we now have considerably one of the best coaches in the state.

[TheAmbassador]

3 minutes ago, GHSblackhelmet said:

The late 80's early 90's Cherokees were a handful . The pre Satterfield days were a joke other than 67-68 I believe. The late 90's were bad as well. There have been several teams in the 2010's that should have been elite with the proper coaching but didn't have it. Fortunately we now have considerably one of the best coaches in the state.

I don’t dispute it at all. The mid to late 80’s and early 90’s were really good for Greenback. 2011 Greenback was a pretty good ball club and you’ve pretty much been good every since. 

[Roy Dillard]

4 hours ago, GHSblackhelmet said:

The late 80's early 90's Cherokees were a handful . The pre Satterfield days were a joke other than 67-68 I believe. The late 90's were bad as well. There have been several teams in the 2010's that should have been elite with the proper coaching but didn't have it. Fortunately we now have considerably one of the best coaches in the state.

Helmet boy what kind of mess this? When you can get Maryville passer, two boys drum that Shadowens man, one linebacker from Tellico to go along with  that Willis boy and three lineman that could play in the SEC. That Ryan man could coach blind folded.  Are you stupid? Figure you need to get back to wearing that g string backwards helmet boy.  You think im joking but im not.