Jump to content

Boyd Buc @ CAK


reaction
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 10/13/2019 at 1:23 PM, OLDad said:

These teams are about even. I wouldn't be shocked if Boyd won.

But I do think Boyd is over rated. Their schedule has been rediculously easy. On the other hand, CAK has played a much tougher schedule. 

Like Grace, we made it much too easy for Boyd to pass against us. I don't think CAK will do that.

:popcorneater:

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/18/2019 at 11:51 PM, WarriorPride1971 said:

What in the world was this display of football? Up that much you let them come back? Fake the punt? Why 

I won't take anything away from Boyd, classy program, classy fans. CAK coaches absolutely outsmarted themselves with a misguided fake punt on a 4th and 1 (line it up if you want to go for it, they had been running on Boyd all night) and a terrible decision to try a 4th and 3 on your own 40 when you have Boyd down 31-7 with 2 minutes to go in the first half. This opened the door for everything that could go wrong for CAK to go wrong, and for Boyd to seize the momentum and the opportunities. Hats off, they did. Sometimes the better team get's beat. Going in to this game I felt like they'd be even, but after the 31-7 first two quarters prior to the collapse, I don't think these two were even. Boyd deserved to win this game just as much as CAK deserved to lose it. To even be in the position that going in for a TD at the very end of the game, a fumble costs you the W is truly unbelievable from a 31-7 starting point. This L will haunt the coaching staff forever. 

Nothing to do now other than take the L and go play two more tough games and try to finish 8-2. CAK had a chance to win every game left on their schedule. Not a guarantee, but they should be able to compete and have had a chance to finish 9-1. I hope these young men are able to trash can the loss and focus on the next two. 

With the vast majority of the team coming back next year, it is important that these young men bounce back and finish strong. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • TSSAA restrictions for hiring non-faculty coaches have been removed for over a year at this point. In the past a non-faculty person had to be "grandfathered" by being an assistant coach for five years, being fingerprinted, and having a background check run per TSSAA rules... since those were rescinded, the board of directors for the school district are responsible for any/all restrictions on hiring non-faculty personnel. I guess what I'm saying to you is that if you really wanted what you posted, it's already possible as long as your local BOE will allow for it.
    • stop it, rlh. you’re gonna get me all misty eyed and sentimental.    i see seven fairly regularly. ….but slim shady, that’s like spotting bigfoot on main street. you just hope he doesn’t spot you. 
    • Are you trying to say you didn't find Seven and ShadySlim going at it?
    • hey goat! how’s monterey looking this year?! 
    • several people actually. they said “snoball, do you know who railbird81 is on coacht?” I said, “never heard of her.” they said, “you ought to check it out they’re getting fired up on there like the old days.” well, you can imagine my disappointment when I came here expecting sharp, witty banter and all i found was more akin to toddlers slap fighting. and what looks like 1 guy/gal talking to themselves with multiple accounts.
×
  • Create New...