Jump to content

Hendersonville @ Beech


eers
 Share

Recommended Posts

21 minutes ago, sportsguy22 said:

We’re going to play the should’ve game?! Hendersonville should have had a kick return TD not taken back (based on the missed call per the replay) and a few field goals on the board too. Can’t play that game I thought? Now, the biggest question is are you a Beech fan/supporter?? If so, that explains your post and responses. It’s biased if so. 

the kick return is one thing, but you cannot play that game with the field goals. he straight up shanked them. are you gonna say they should’ve had a better kicker? because the missed field goals weren’t something anybody controlled except the kicker. you cannot say they should’ve had those field goals when the kid missed under his own power. 

you could maybe say the kick TD should’ve counted, but the field goals...come on. nothing kept those from being made. Martin just straight up missed. and it sucks, but that’s part of the game

Edited by Bump11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, eers said:

I am a Beech supporter and perhaps it is a little biased, but it is undeniable that Beech beat them consistently up front (after the first possession) all night. Did Hendersonville make some mistakes, certainly. With that, Beech is 2-3 TDs better on any night. These teams are clearly not equal. That said Hendersonville will be playing for a Region Championship week 10. 

Completely disagree, other than the last sentence. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Bump11 said:

the kick return is one thing, but you cannot play that game with the field goals. he straight up shanked them. are you gonna say they should’ve had a better kicker? because the missed field goals weren’t something anybody controlled except the kicker. you cannot say they should’ve had those field goals when the kid missed under his own power. 

you could maybe say the kick TD should’ve counted, but the field goals...come on. nothing kept those from being made. Martin just straight up missed. and it sucks, but that’s part of the game

It’s not about missing them! It’s the fact that they left a lot on the board, but more importantly moved the ball all night, obviously getting into scoring position constantly. It’s very simple...they are as good as Beech and I could see that with my own eyes. On that night, we saw the reasons why Beech won the game of course. But, to say it was dominate and they are two to three touchdowns better is nuts! It just speaks to bias and it’s understandable on here...it’s just not reality when you speak to those of us unaffiliated with those teams or that rivalry or that area. Talent wise, two very even teams. Missed field goals and a big controversial call...that made the difference on this night. Anyone know the stats by the way??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, sportsguy22 said:

I watched the game on TV. Every play. I couldn’t disagree anymore with this post. Those two teams are dead even! Hendersonville missed three field goals, moved the ball all night long, and had a very controversial kick return TD called back and a few other questionable calls go against them too. Take this from someone not associated with either program and just watching to enjoy a great high school game in the midstate. Both are good teams, and Hendersonville will go on to have a really solid season. In no way whatsoever, though, did Beech dominate that football game. Two very even teams.

Sounds about right. Eers is still disgruntled from the Powell game lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just went and read the play by play from Hendersonville twitter, which is very informative and ran well BTW if you're reading this...

So looks like HHS went 0-3 on FG's, one from long distance. They had the kick return for TD that was called back. They fumbled on a kickoff return giving BHS a short field which resulted in a TD. Then in 2nd half HHS fumbled on a punt return, which Beech also capitalized on with a TD. Also threw an INT. 

Beech threw 2 ints's and had some penalties. That's what I got out of it.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, thegreatone36 said:

I just went and read the play by play from Hendersonville twitter, which is very informative and ran well BTW if you're reading this...

So looks like HHS went 0-3 on FG's, one from long distance. They had the kick return for TD that was called back. They fumbled on a kickoff return giving BHS a short field which resulted in a TD. Then in 2nd half HHS fumbled on a punt return, which Beech also capitalized on with a TD. Also threw an INT. 

Beech threw 2 ints's and had some penalties. That's what I got out of it.

While that play by play is accurate, it doesn’t show that Beech hit them in the teeth all night. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, thegreatone36 said:

I just went and read the play by play from Hendersonville twitter, which is very informative and ran well BTW if you're reading this...

So looks like HHS went 0-3 on FG's, one from long distance. They had the kick return for TD that was called back. They fumbled on a kickoff return giving BHS a short field which resulted in a TD. Then in 2nd half HHS fumbled on a punt return, which Beech also capitalized on with a TD. Also threw an INT. 

Beech threw 2 ints's and had some penalties. That's what I got out of it.

Well said. Again, two very even teams! Those stats prove it big time. By the way Hendersonville outgained Beech 327-304 in total offense, but had the three key turnovers and the kick return TD called back controversially. Two dead even football teams both via the stats and by the eye test. I rest my case.

Edited by sportsguy22
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • They’ve both gotten worse. I’ve seen enough games to know that. 
    • The only two transfers that Bearden has gotten that went on to play college football were a defensive back from Karnes, who transferred here way before the new coaching staff got here, and a running back from Carter, who went on to play at Maryville College. Both players received those offers while at Bearden, and both players got a diploma from Bearden High School. Therefore, they are Bearden kids, and you can’t do anything about that.   The transfer from Seymour didn’t win the job, what do you expect two quarterbacks to start at the same time? He played great on JV when he could stay healthy, and when he came in on varsity, he did great. The quarterback position is definitely going to be in good hands when the current starting quarterback leaves, but until then, they’re just going to be battling it out like every good quarterback competition does. The current starting quarterback has his flaws, and that is in the pass game, but what he doesn’t have flaws is running and scrambling, and if you go back and watch any game, which I’m sure you didn’t watch any, we used him very often, and when we needed a deep ball, we brought in the transfer from Seymour. The starting quarterback last year will be a senior this year, and the Seymour transfer will be a junior, so the Seymour transfer is definitely going to get his spotlight. He may even win the job this year. Football isn’t about who the newspaper thinks is the best kid. The best kid in the position will win the starting job, and I trust the coaching staff more than a newspaper or article to pick my starting QB.
    • I mean, we’ve only gotten two transfers that went on to play college football, one who went to UT Martin came his second semester junior year before the new coaching staff was here, and the other one went on to play at Maryville College, in which I don’t believe he had any interest prior to transferring.
    • An FYI: To see how an opponent has done against another opponent since 2001- go to the game by clicking on one of the teams. Click the G beside the game. For example, Milan: The info will show you the previous matchups and other info.
    • All these college signees went yo other schools for 3 years, were getting college offers then transferred to Bearden. It’s not like this staff did much to develop them.    The BBall coaches son and the Seymour transfer were some of the most talented QBs in the region, and you guys developed them into QBs who might complete one pass a game. 
×
  • Create New...