Jump to content

Fairview @ White House 3a R6


Swarm
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, WHHSBDP123 said:

If thats the case, I like our chances. Our kicker is Mr. Do it everything. Hit I believe a 35-40 yarder against waverly right before half and hit another 43 yarder against portland I believe

It's definitely the case. I bet we'll have it corrected tomorrow night. Kickers got plenty of leg. Seemed to be a snap/hold issue. If not we'll be going for 2. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Swarm said:

It's definitely the case. I bet we'll have it corrected tomorrow night. Kickers got plenty of leg. Seemed to be a snap/hold issue. If not we'll be going for 2. 

Going for 2 always seemed like a fun idea to me if you have at least 5 solid 2 point plays that you know will work 9 times out of 10 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, WHHSBDP123 said:

Going for 2 always seemed like a fun idea to me if you have at least 5 solid 2 point plays that you know will work 9 times out of 10 

For sure. I've always been a fan of it myself although it's historically not something we do with regularity. My bet is we'll try to kick after first score and if don't work scrap it. That's what we did against Heritage until we got a couple scores ahead. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Swarm said:

For sure. I've always been a fan of it myself although it's historically not something we do with regularity. My bet is we'll try to kick after first score and if don't work scrap it. That's what we did against Heritage until we got a couple scores ahead. 

Only issue I have with going for 2 is if you do it the first score and dont get it, it puts you In a bind. If they score twice makes it 14-6 assuming they make there kicks and if you dont get 2 the next time just puts you in a weird spot

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, WHHSBDP123 said:

Only issue I have with going for 2 is if you do it the first score and dont get it, it puts you In a bind. If they score twice makes it 14-6 assuming they make there kicks and if you dont get 2 the next time just puts you in a weird spot

Yeah. Like you say they need to very high percentage plays. 

On the contrary, I remember a game we had against Camden a few years ago where we were both scoring back and forth. They were getting 2pts, we were getting 1. By half they'd about got a score ahead and forced us out of our element in the second half. We ended up losing by 2

Edited by Swarm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Swarm said:

Yeah. Like you say they need to very high percentage plays. 

On the contrary, I remember a game we had against Camden a few years ago where we were both scoring back and forth. They were getting 2pts, we were getting 1. By half they'd about got a score ahead and forced us out of our element in the second half. We ended up losing by 2

Is 23 the actual starting QB or do you all have an injury?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Notbiasatall21 said:

Is 23 the actual starting QB or do you all have an injury?

He's been the starter all year. #1 was the QB but is injured and hasn't played all year. I hear he's week to week now and could be back anytime. I hope its soon. Takes our passing game to a whole new level. 

23 has done a good job but I'd love to see him go back to receiver. He's a really good wideout. 

Edited by Swarm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GreenbrierCat2 said:

Fairview always has a good team but since this is a first time meeting, they probably don’t realize that WH usually always have a homefield “advantage.”   
 

I say WH by enough to win.  

Fairview does not even have homefield "advantage" most Fridays playing in the Nest, so that will be nothing new! LOL!  I am looking forward to this game, hope Fairview shows up to play, and both teams are injury free.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • Won't happen. College coaches will back the coach every time and it cost this young lady her senior season. Looks like the player may be right on this one. School let her  go after one season. This stuff happens more than you think. 
    • “No college is going to offer a scholarship to a player that is kicked off of the team.” For language? I’m not seeing that as a dealbreaker. 
    • Why did the coach get rehired after she was let go as an assistant by the former Warren County coach and the current AD?? Is that accurate?? I am very familiar with situations like this. Suprised lawsuits haven't happend before. If the coach unfairly let the player go, I think she has a shot because it cost her a scholarship. No college is going to offer a scholarship to a player that is kicked off of the team. Not going to happen. There are bad hires like this a bunch and kids are treated unfairly by coaches that can't coach a lick and have super long ropes somehow. Amazing how some of these coaches get hired and keep their job. 
    • I am going to assume you are not a lawyer, and most reasonable lawyers would not say the lawsuit has a zero percent chance in court. I agree with you that a coach has the ability to dismiss anyone from a team. However, Ms. Winfree was never presented with the opportunity to present her witnesses and have them tell the coaches and administrators what they heard. A lawyer could better explain the lawsuit and the grounds to you. Before you start making wild assumptions about the lawsuit, would it be too much to ask that you do a little legal research first? The lawsuit is dealing with due process, loss of property, and defamation.   You can read the lawsuit here: https://bdnewsletter.files.wordpress.com/2024/04/doc-1-complaint-filed-4-18-2024.pdf  
    • The administration took the path of backing the coach and whispering to people that the kid was a problem. The reality is that the kid was never a problem on a team or classroom. The player says she has witnessed who back her not saying the f-word.  Why did the coach make that story up and other stories? I am not Sigmund Freud and do not have an answer for the ex=-coach's behavior..  
×
  • Create New...