Jump to content

R3: East Robertson @ SC


SCHSAllHail

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, TheCommissioner said:

East can’t have the same first half penalties against SC that they had against Marion and win against SC. ER will have to play virtually clean the whole game to win in Carthage. The talent is there for ER, it’s obviously the discipline that is questionable 

Funny thing is ER played just as bad in the first half vs Marion as they did vs SC and it was 0-0 at half time. ER had 4 turnovers and 150+ penalty yards vs Smith Co the first go around and still had a chance to win the game on the last drive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Chiefbigfoot said:

ER drove on smith co the last meeting but would shoot their self in the foot. First drive of the game ER was running it down their throat and then the penalties came in. Last night ER offense had 2 live ball penalties, rest were after the whistle.

Penalties are a recurring theme for ER

 

Psssssh.   They will have a penalty free game Friday and CRUISE to victory.   Makes complete sense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Chiefbigfoot said:

I’ve seen both of these teams play, even sc posters will tell you that if ER plays their BEST game they will win. (Still very highly unlikely)

If ER plays like they've never played.  In other words.  Like a team that isn't them that's better than them they win. 

 

So if ERplays like smith.    Got it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, GeneralForrest said:

ER beats a paper tiger Marion and all of a sudden they have a chance against Smith?  Smith mercy ruled a similar team in City almost in the 1st Q.  

If ER scores 24 in Marion 14 vs Wmith is about right.  If ER starts as badly as they did last night it will be 20-0 at half. 

Actually ER had a chance with 4 mins left in the game the first time they played. I’m not saying ER is going to win. But ER is not CITY. But I like when you predict ER to lose like you did against Marion. It’s good stuff!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CCLHL08 said:

Actually ER had a chance with 4 mins left in the game the first time they played. I’m not saying ER is going to win. But ER is not CITY. But I like when you predict ER to lose like you did against Marion. It’s good stuff!

Smith isn't Marion.   I w a s comparing city to Marion not ER.   Try to read cognitively. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I watched the first game against these 2 and watched SC last night and read about ER last night!

 

By what I’ve seen and read…I believe SC has improved a ton and ER hasn’t improved that much. 

 

You can’t beat great teams who are physically comparable to you when you’re not disciplined.

 

With that being said… I’m taking SC by 14 plus at home knowing the score of the last game between the two and acknowledging ER has the best athlete between the 2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, H2Oman said:

I watched the first game against these 2 and watched SC last night and read about ER last night!

 

By what I’ve seen and read…I believe SC has improved a ton and ER hasn’t improved that much. 

 

You can’t beat great teams who are physically comparable to you when you’re not disciplined.

 

With that being said… I’m taking SC by 14 plus at home knowing the score of the last game between the two and acknowledging ER has the best athlete between the 2.

I bet 85 % of the penalties are coming from the sophomores. ER is so Soph heavy. Still really young and it shows a lot. Going to be hard to beat smith as it is. Definitely can’t with penalties. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SCHSAllHail said:

I think anybody honest with themselves would say ER's A+ game beats our A+ game. That being said, we've not seen them put together an A+ game against a real opponent this year.

I don't think ER has improved any more than we have since the first time we played.

Y’all have definitely improved more than we have

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • Deja vu all over again, 7 yrs apart. SMDH Does anybody talk to each other?
    • OK, well, that’s because two quarterbacks can’t start. That’s football 101. The main quarterback won the starting job, so he was on varsity, and the Seymour transfer did not win the starting job. He played some varsity. He was mainly junior varsity, and he balled out when healthy, so for the starting quarterback who’s been starting varsity since his freshman year, if you have any form of proof that he’s gotten worse, somehow, whether that means stats or whatnot, please feel free to share.
    • They’ve both gotten worse. I’ve seen enough games to know that. 
    • The only two transfers that Bearden has gotten that went on to play college football were a defensive back from Karnes, who transferred here way before the new coaching staff got here, and a running back from Carter, who went on to play at Maryville College. Both players received those offers while at Bearden, and both players got a diploma from Bearden High School. Therefore, they are Bearden kids, and you can’t do anything about that.   The transfer from Seymour didn’t win the job, what do you expect two quarterbacks to start at the same time? He played great on JV when he could stay healthy, and when he came in on varsity, he did great. The quarterback position is definitely going to be in good hands when the current starting quarterback leaves, but until then, they’re just going to be battling it out like every good quarterback competition does. The current starting quarterback has his flaws, and that is in the pass game, but what he doesn’t have flaws is running and scrambling, and if you go back and watch any game, which I’m sure you didn’t watch any, we used him very often, and when we needed a deep ball, we brought in the transfer from Seymour. The starting quarterback last year will be a senior this year, and the Seymour transfer will be a junior, so the Seymour transfer is definitely going to get his spotlight. He may even win the job this year. Football isn’t about who the newspaper thinks is the best kid. The best kid in the position will win the starting job, and I trust the coaching staff more than a newspaper or article to pick my starting QB.
    • I mean, we’ve only gotten two transfers that went on to play college football, one who went to UT Martin came his second semester junior year before the new coaching staff was here, and the other one went on to play at Maryville College, in which I don’t believe he had any interest prior to transferring.
×
  • Create New...