Jump to content

Refs win a great game tonight!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


gomab2
 Share

Recommended Posts

Guest PLAYFAIR

IT ALSO GOES ON IN THE GIRL'S TOURNAMENT TOO.THEY KEEP THESE GAMES CLOSES AND HERE COMES THE BAD CALLS,AROUND THE 3RD AND 4TH QUARTER.I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHY THIS TOURNAMENT CAN'T BE PLAYED FAIR.IT JUST ONLY A KID'S GAME.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I am not ragging anyone,i didnt start the thread.Matter a fact,READ THE TITLE" Refs Win game tonight".. I dont understand how you can say that he isnt implying Bradley Wouldnt have won without the ref's... You cant expect to title a thread like that and not get negative responses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would like to mention the intentional foul that was called after the tech's. A guy reaching in is not an intentional foul.The Hamilton player did not grab the guy. There were also a couple of situations were a Bradley player & a Hamilton player got tangled up and the foul was given to the Hamilton guy. Why not give a double tech or a warning to each player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't be naive Pantherbert. He doesn't have a big neon flashing light over his door saying recruiting office now open. He doesn't have to. He is not the only one down in Memphis either. All of those big kids just show up at Hamilton because of his coaching ability. Funny how Carver, South Side, Kirby, North Side and Kingsbury have been down for a while to name a few. Oh yeah, Kingsbury lost their recruiting coordinator to Mitchell. Nice Freshman class. Speaking of coaching, it sure was nice of Johnson to call those timeouts for Temple's offensive possessions that set up those nice inbounds baskets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

volntn - what Gomab is saying by the title is not that the refs cost a team the game. He's saying that the refs interfered too heavily on the game too much to the credit of themselves (the refs) instead of letting the teams play basketball. He's saying basicaly that the refs got to involved into the game. If gomab was a disgruntled fan wanting to lash out, he would have title it in one of these ways:

 

1. Bradley wins, thanks to the refs

2. Bradley pays refs (a favorite title of many)

3. Hamilton really won, refs cheated

 

Trust me, I don't see gomab as ranting and raving about Hamilton losing. I see him more angered at incessant fouls called that didn't let the kids play basketball. And gomab even realized that, Hey Bradley was up by 6 and probably would have won anyway. He just wants to see good, fair basketball games.

;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gomab, I've read many of your post and you seem to have insite to Tn.HS basketball. However you cannot make statements like you have made in this thread without taking from Bradley's win. So if you really "don't want to take anything away from Bradley", just hush!

[Edited by swish1 on 3-22-03 12:20A]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All I am saying is the gomab's group says the refs had a bad game -- the group I am with says the ref's did a good job. Some people in my group have been coming to games for years and many respect their basketball opinions.

 

Gomab is considered unbiased, I would put members of my group in the same category - they are unbiased also and had no favorite in the game.

 

Yes, there were some missed calls - there always are -- the only real question my goup had was the intentional foul.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont know what thread you are reading,I never said he was a hamilton fan.. I was just trying to understand his TITLE. I am a Bear,Bleeding Black and Gold,an alum,and season ticket holder,so dont expect me not to repsond to a thread about my Bear's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • A little confused.  What charter/prep schools made it to state in Baseball?  
    • Fortuitously encountering Clint amidst the ambience of Goodyear this morning sparked an impromptu yet intellectually stimulating conversation, wherein we engaged in a rigorous assessment of prospective candidates for the esteemed role of head football coach. Our discourse, characterized by its spontaneity and depth, led to the formulation of astute observations and discerning judgments regarding the suitability of various individuals for this pivotal position. Allow me to elucidate the fruits of our collaborative contemplation: This commentary endeavors to offer a discerning articulation of my subjective viewpoint, emphasizing a conscientious commitment to maintaining impartiality and refraining from any semblance of derogation directed towards individuals.  Those who possess meritorious qualifications for the esteemed head coaching role, delineated without hierarchical precedence, include: Rennard Woodmore, an esteemed alumnus of the Yellow Jackets, presents a magnificent pedigree, having held prominent positions in head coaching capacities across various regions. His pivotal role as a coordinator for teams contending for state championships further enhances his stature in the realm of football leadership. Kyle Gregory, erstwhile adorned in the resplendent gold insignia, though lacking direct head coaching experience, brings to the fore his invaluable insights garnered as a coordinator for esteemed teams, showcasing an acute understanding of the requisites for triumph whilst attired in the esteemed purple and gold regalia. Steven Jackson, whose contributions transcended mere clipboard duties under the tutelage of Kevin Creasy, emerges as an exceptional candidate for Trousdale County. His prior tenure and triumphs as an assistant coach underscore his suitability for the role. The sole drawback lies in his lack of affiliation with Trousdale County as an alumnus. Brandon Eden's extensive tenure within the chronicles of Trousdale County football, spanning a significant portion of its State Championships, coupled with his successful stints as a coordinator across diverse locales, underscores his candidacy despite a dearth of direct head coaching experience at the high school level. Davy Cothron, while beset by a modest playing career, has emerged as a luminary in offensive strategy, drawing parallels to the transformative appointment of Barker in 2015, thereby warranting consideration for his proven acumen in this realm. Joshua Hackett, notwithstanding his non-alumnus status, has left an indelible imprint across Middle Tennessee, distinguished by his adept curation of formidable defensive units as a coordinator at Watertown, albeit without direct head coaching experience. Kevin Creasy, the epitome of coaching prowess, merits an offer irrespective of his current inclinations, his unparalleled capacity to secure victories transcending geographical and institutional bounds, potentially extending to a role as Director of Schools should it align with his aspirations. Conversely, individuals who have not demonstrably earned the mantle of head coaching, enumerated without sequential precedence, encompass: Brad Waggoner David Barker Paul Pitts Jeremy Pruitt Clint Satterfield Robbie Atwood Wesley Satterfield Ben Johnson BJ West Whom do you all deem most fitting to assume the mantle of the next coach, and what rationale informs your choice? Conversely, whom do you perceive as ill-suited for the role, and what underpins your reasoning for their exclusion?
    • He's a Clinton fan.  But I wouldn't admit that either.  
    • Their any schedule out their for team camp?
    • This sums it all up to perfection.  
×
  • Create New...