Jump to content

This Rule NEEDS to change TSSAA!


FridayMainEvent
 Share

Recommended Posts

Five of the twelve Division 1 Semi-final matches have a team involved that did not win their region title. That's a good thing...
 
In my opinion the worse rule in the TSSAA is the alternate Home team format for rounds 3 and 4. I think this should only be used in situations involving teams with the same playoff seedings. All other games should be determined by playoff seedings (or region finish) Teams that finish higher in region play should not travel to teams that finished lower. Here are three examples for next Friday:
 
Second seeded Rockwood host region 3 Champs Tyner Academy. Rockwood has an amazing team as their victory over #1 ranked Meigs County last night proves that. My issue is a team which did not even win their own region should not be hosting a team which did. Anytime a higher seed is playing a lower seed the higher seed SHOULD host. The alternate home games between quads should only apply if you have two teams which entered the playoffs with the same seeding.
 
Second Seeded Springfield hosts red hot Haywood County. Never should a region champ be required to travel halfway across the State to play a region runner up that's just wrong.
 
My third and WORSE example here is region Champs Knoxville Catholic being forced to play at Knoxville Central. Granted, this is a very short road trip, but you've got a region champ being forced to travel to an 8-5 team that finished FOURTH in their region. Did they get hot in the post season? Absolutely. Should a region champ be forced to play a road game at a fourth seed? NEVER not in your wildest dreams.
 
I've harped on this forever and it remains one of the worse rules in the TSSAA pertaining to post season football. I hope at some point they revisit this and set it right. SEEDING DETERMINES HOME TEAM WHENEVER POSSIBLE!
 
End Rant......
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, wpasi said:

Me too it shouldn't get any certain team every year. By the way Catholic should be in div 2 or have to play all their games on the road lol

I don't disagree that Catholic should be Division 2, but that wasn't the point of the post.   Anyone who feels a region champ should travel to a fourth seed for a semi-final game need to lay off the weed...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, FreeAgent11 said:

So you think a region champ should travel to a fourth seed???  Come on Southtowner, I know you better than that.   I also like the rotation when it involves to equally seeded teams.   

I like the rotation.  We know where we are going when the season starts.  Now, I wouldn't go all ballistic if it were to change.  

Why should anyone from Rutherford county have to go to Maryville EVERY year if they happen to finish 2nd in their region?  

Regions aren't all stacked the same.   Just rotate it.  It's simplistic.  I would like for you to bring this up with the coaches you interview on you future shows. I'd like to hear their input on this.  And how they think it should be done.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Southtowner said:

I like the rotation.  We know where we are going when the season starts.  Now, I wouldn't go all ballistic if it were to change.  

Why should anyone from Rutherford county have to go to Maryville EVERY year if they happen to finish 2nd in their region?  

Regions aren't all stacked the same.   Just rotate it.  It's simplistic.  I would like for you to bring this up with the coaches you interview on you future shows. I'd like to hear their input on this.  And how they think it should be done.  

I am with Southtowner.. Looking at it from a team like Rockwood's view I think it is fair for them to host the semifinal.. They have already played two on the road so I feel like they deserve it from a gate/money standpoint too. The higher seed has already hosted a few games and the other has hosted 1 game.. I feel like they should get it if it falls on their year if a team makes a run like this 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, bluedevil6913 said:

I am with Southtowner.. Looking at it from a team like Rockwood's view I think it is fair for them to host the semifinal.. They have already played two on the road so I feel like they deserve it from a gate/money standpoint too. The higher seed has already hosted a few games and the other has hosted 1 game.. I feel like they should get it if it falls on their year if a team makes a run like this 

They would of played all of them at home if they had won the region.   That's my point!  Your rewarded with home games for winning your region.    Speaking toward Southtowners comment:   If you finish second in your region every year and travel to Maryville every year, I'm fine with that.  That means your beating the team that caused you to finish in second place each time.   You should of beaten them the first time and you'd be hosting every other year under my idea also...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, FreeAgent11 said:

I don't disagree that Catholic should be Division 2, but that wasn't the point of the post.   Anyone who feels a region champ should travel to a fourth seed for a semi-final game need to lay off the weed...

Don't smoke any weed my job won't allow it plus (my wife would kill me) how about 4th seed should never host.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • Yes this process is moving slower than I would have expected
    • also was told coady auston applied, he served as defensive coordinator for greenfield under don pitt several years ago before going to Obion county  
    • TSSAA restrictions for hiring non-faculty coaches have been removed for over a year at this point. In the past a non-faculty person had to be "grandfathered" by being an assistant coach for five years, being fingerprinted, and having a background check run per TSSAA rules... since those were rescinded, the board of directors for the school district are responsible for any/all restrictions on hiring non-faculty personnel. I guess what I'm saying to you is that if you really wanted what you posted, it's already possible as long as your local BOE will allow for it.
    • stop it, rlh. you’re gonna get me all misty eyed and sentimental.    i see seven fairly regularly. ….but slim shady, that’s like spotting bigfoot on main street. you just hope he doesn’t spot you. 
    • Are you trying to say you didn't find Seven and ShadySlim going at it?
×
  • Create New...