Jump to content

Union City


gamebreaker
 Share

Recommended Posts

It's a heck of a lot better than watching the grass grow with the Wishbone or Wing-T! A lot of smaller programs with less talent are now running the spread all across the nation. You can do it with very little talent IF and ONLY IF the person who puts it in knows how to organize practice and teach the passing game and the spread running game. When I was in high school all we ran was the BONE. You are right, back then, it was the thing to run. Today it is the gun and there are more variations each year. Colleges are switching over and its been in the pros for two decades. It is here to stay!

i think the shotgun, while being obviousily the top of the mountain at present, will be proven to be a fad just like everything else. it was power I in the 80's, wing T in the 90's, shotgun in the 00's, and it will be somthing else in the teens. i hope it's those crazy lineman wide formations or whatever it's called that steve spurier use to always use to screw with ole phil. that'd be fun to watch :D but seriously, defensive coaches will come up with schemes that will beat that formation just like every formation before it. the shotgun is the premier set, but its day's are numbered just like evrything else. the question only remains, what's next? :D

 

 

"nothing endures but change"

 

-heraclitus-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 22
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Check out the State Champions from both Florida and Texas in 3A, 4A, and 5A, the last few years... ALL SHOTGUN SPREAD NO TE OFFENSES! IF YOU HAVE THE RIGHT COACH, IT CAN WORK AT ANY LEVEL! The difference is you can't take a typical high school practice schedule and make it work. Instead of working on the running scheme for 50 minutes a week and maybe spending 10 minutes on the pass, you have to flip-flop your approach to practice. My teams practice about two hours a week on nothing but the pass and about half that time on the running game. It can be done but you have to completely change your approach to the game. Every down is a passing down and you only run when it is advantageous to do so.

 

If you can understand what I was trying to say is that they will stun teams in one A because those teams have not seen it. You said yourself that upper class teams run that offense. So doesnt it stand to reason that if an upper class team runs that offense, they can probably stop it too since that is all they scheme against!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you familiar with this region? McKenzie ran what seemed like exclusively out of shotgun. So teams have seen the gun before.

 

 

If you can understand what I was trying to say is that they will stun teams in one A because those teams have not seen it. You said yourself that upper class teams run that offense. So doesnt it stand to reason that if an upper class team runs that offense, they can probably stop it too since that is all they scheme against!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you familiar with this region? McKenzie ran what seemed like exclusively out of shotgun. So teams have seen the gun before.

 

I forgot youre right McKenzie just got killed by everyone they played in their region huh. Anyway when they did play someone outside their region (as I said) like obion county(scrimmage this year 14-0) they lost!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, so McKenzie was beaten by Obion in 2006 Jamboree, but go back and check who won 5 of the 6 last games between McKenzie and Obion. By the way, McKenzie is 1A with 370 kids in school, hmm...isn't Obion 3A with about 750 kids?? Seems to me, a school of that size ought to beat a 1A school.

 

Got killed by everybody in our region? Is that a sarcastic joke? We were 6-1 in our region, and number 2 behind State Runnerup Union City.

 

On teams out of our region, we are 1 and 2. We beat Dresden, and lost a close game against Trenton, and of course, you know Huntingdon always wins.

 

Aren't you a quick one!!! YES that was sarcastic because a comment was made about trouble within the region. Exactly so you would say that you had trouble out of your divison. My point exactly. OH by the way Central has about 900 kids with around 400 males. It is a sad day when you only have 10% of those kids that want to play football.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aren't you a quick one!!! YES that was sarcastic because a comment was made about trouble within the region. Exactly so you would say that you had trouble out of your divison. My point exactly. OH by the way Central has about 900 kids with around 400 males. It is a sad day when you only have 10% of those kids that want to play football.

 

I would be complaining about being out-numbered by the girls 5 to 4. haha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would be complaining about being out-numbered by the girls 5 to 4. haha

I would be complaining about losing to OC the last 4 years.....

 

But,this is about the shotgun being played at UC....

 

I know during spring it didn't translate to scores....It will have to get much better,although the teams you guys scrimmaged in spring will be far stronger than your region schedule....

 

I think when you are going to be a little weaker,you try to come up with gimmicks to compete..McKenzie did it and did really well,they would have been VERY tough to handle if they would have any semblance of a running game or defense...

Edited by backinthaoc
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would be complaining about losing to OC the last 4 years.....

 

But,this is about the shotgun being played at UC....

 

I know during spring it didn't translate to scores....It will have to get much better,although the teams you guys scrimmaged in spring will be far stronger than your region schedule....

 

I think when you are going to be a little weaker,you try to come up with gimmicks to compete..McKenzie did it and did really well,they would have been VERY tough to handle if they would have any semblance of a running game or defense...

 

Sorry it was a typo. I meant "wouldn't". But I'm not sorry that UC does not follow McKenzie's example and play down in the preseason. Why would UC ever want to copy McKenzie? I guess it's because McKenzie lasted longer in the post season. NOT. The big guy beating up the little guy does nothing for the big guy.

 

It's kinda bad that the only thing OC can ever brag about is beating UC. I wish OC could get over UC and focus on getting past the second round.

 

This will be the year for OC football. Just don't make the OC-UC game your championship. Finish games other than the covington and UC game. Randy Barnes always said "Don't be a one hit wonder."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • A little confused.  What charter/prep schools made it to state in Baseball?  
    • Fortuitously encountering Clint amidst the ambience of Goodyear this morning sparked an impromptu yet intellectually stimulating conversation, wherein we engaged in a rigorous assessment of prospective candidates for the esteemed role of head football coach. Our discourse, characterized by its spontaneity and depth, led to the formulation of astute observations and discerning judgments regarding the suitability of various individuals for this pivotal position. Allow me to elucidate the fruits of our collaborative contemplation: This commentary endeavors to offer a discerning articulation of my subjective viewpoint, emphasizing a conscientious commitment to maintaining impartiality and refraining from any semblance of derogation directed towards individuals.  Those who possess meritorious qualifications for the esteemed head coaching role, delineated without hierarchical precedence, include: Rennard Woodmore, an esteemed alumnus of the Yellow Jackets, presents a magnificent pedigree, having held prominent positions in head coaching capacities across various regions. His pivotal role as a coordinator for teams contending for state championships further enhances his stature in the realm of football leadership. Kyle Gregory, erstwhile adorned in the resplendent gold insignia, though lacking direct head coaching experience, brings to the fore his invaluable insights garnered as a coordinator for esteemed teams, showcasing an acute understanding of the requisites for triumph whilst attired in the esteemed purple and gold regalia. Steven Jackson, whose contributions transcended mere clipboard duties under the tutelage of Kevin Creasy, emerges as an exceptional candidate for Trousdale County. His prior tenure and triumphs as an assistant coach underscore his suitability for the role. The sole drawback lies in his lack of affiliation with Trousdale County as an alumnus. Brandon Eden's extensive tenure within the chronicles of Trousdale County football, spanning a significant portion of its State Championships, coupled with his successful stints as a coordinator across diverse locales, underscores his candidacy despite a dearth of direct head coaching experience at the high school level. Davy Cothron, while beset by a modest playing career, has emerged as a luminary in offensive strategy, drawing parallels to the transformative appointment of Barker in 2015, thereby warranting consideration for his proven acumen in this realm. Joshua Hackett, notwithstanding his non-alumnus status, has left an indelible imprint across Middle Tennessee, distinguished by his adept curation of formidable defensive units as a coordinator at Watertown, albeit without direct head coaching experience. Kevin Creasy, the epitome of coaching prowess, merits an offer irrespective of his current inclinations, his unparalleled capacity to secure victories transcending geographical and institutional bounds, potentially extending to a role as Director of Schools should it align with his aspirations. Conversely, individuals who have not demonstrably earned the mantle of head coaching, enumerated without sequential precedence, encompass: Brad Waggoner David Barker Paul Pitts Jeremy Pruitt Clint Satterfield Robbie Atwood Wesley Satterfield Ben Johnson BJ West Whom do you all deem most fitting to assume the mantle of the next coach, and what rationale informs your choice? Conversely, whom do you perceive as ill-suited for the role, and what underpins your reasoning for their exclusion?
    • He's a Clinton fan.  But I wouldn't admit that either.  
    • Their any schedule out their for team camp?
    • This sums it all up to perfection.  
×
  • Create New...