CantStopTheChop Posted January 17, 2007 Report Share Posted January 17, 2007 All the possible Qbs are mobile Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCN08FearTheSpear Posted January 18, 2007 Report Share Posted January 18, 2007 hey 2p or any ohs fans or players is the wingt set for oakland Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OakIand Posted January 18, 2007 Report Share Posted January 18, 2007 hey 2p or any ohs fans or players is the wingt set for oakland No it is not a set, but we are doing a different offense from last year. I figure if Coach Ferg wants us to know he'll tell us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmu031 Posted January 18, 2007 Author Report Share Posted January 18, 2007 All the possible Qbs are mobile as mobile as thomas? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2priceless Posted January 18, 2007 Report Share Posted January 18, 2007 as mobile as thomas? Well to tell the truth, who knew Scott was that mobile last yr? I sure didn't. hey 2p or any ohs fans or players is the wingt set for oakland I have been unable to confirm this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SopH1025 Posted January 18, 2007 Report Share Posted January 18, 2007 (edited) Is Kiss a lock for QB at Siegel or will "someone" else give him a run for his money? i dont know if he is a lock but he is the lead man as of right now........ i think mccann has a better shot than ward does of competing for the starting spot Edited January 18, 2007 by SopH1025 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SopH1025 Posted January 18, 2007 Report Share Posted January 18, 2007 No it is not a set, but we are doing a different offense from last year. I figure if Coach Ferg wants us to know he'll tell us. so is it the wing t or not thats all i want to know and why are yall changing Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wingman10 Posted January 18, 2007 Report Share Posted January 18, 2007 Why would we pass...when you can run? We barely had to. We supposed to have a new offensive package this year, and new plays out of the wing t good news Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TDCman Posted January 18, 2007 Report Share Posted January 18, 2007 I would expect the play book to grow a bit. It should also be tweaked to reflect the skill of the new players taking roles in the backfield. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SopH1025 Posted January 19, 2007 Report Share Posted January 19, 2007 I would expect the play book to grow a bit. It should also be tweaked to reflect the skill of the new players taking roles in the backfield. every playbook should be Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mynameis Posted January 19, 2007 Report Share Posted January 19, 2007 Any news on teams losing any players who have chosen to move on or any players who have joined up? Also what sophomores figure to be in the playing time mix around the region? It would be my guess theat McAdoo, Elder, and Schaller would all fit that description for Oakland. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TDCman Posted January 20, 2007 Report Share Posted January 20, 2007 Any news on teams losing any players who have chosen to move on or any players who have joined up? Also what sophomores figure to be in the playing time mix around the region? It would be my guess theat McAdoo, Elder, and Schaller would all fit that description for Oakland. Are you asking about sophs from the current team or guys that will be sophs in the fall (this year's freshmen)? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.