Jump to content

Z Plan


croz6110
 Share

Recommended Posts

half of the teams in each group in each district

 

so if an 8 team district has four 1A and four 2A teams then half of each group would be automatic qualifiers.

 

 

It looks to be each group would include both 1a and 2a...because it says if there are 6 teams...3 of them would qualify. How can 3 qualify if it does not include both? Do 1.5 teams qualify for each class?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 27
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

It looks to be each group would include both 1a and 2a...because it says if there are 6 teams...3 of them would qualify. How can 3 qualify if it does not include both? Do 1.5 teams qualify for each class?

 

 

read the rule again:

 

a. One half of the teams in each group (6A, 5A) in each district are

automatic qualifiers (Example: 4 teams - 2 automatic qualifiers; 6 teams -3 automatic qualifiers;

3 teams 1 automatic qualifier; 1 team 0 automatic qualifiers)

 

the "group" refers to the class for playoffs (1A, 2A, etc)

you will have 2 groups in each district for regular season play and then the groups will split for the playoffs with the top half of the teams in each group (rounding down for odd numbers) will get automatic playoff berths.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The mixing of 1A/2A with A/AA terminology is, I think, causing at least some of the confusion here. Think of 1A as "A-Small", 2A as "A-Large", 3A as "AA-Small", etc.

 

Then, if a district has (say) three large and three small teams, then you can gain an automatic in two ways: finish first in your subgroup, or top-2 overall. If you're the only small team in your district, then you can only get an automatic by way of finishing first or second overall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It looks to be each group would include both 1a and 2a...because it says if there are 6 teams...3 of them would qualify. How can 3 qualify if it does not include both? Do 1.5 teams qualify for each class?

 

The way I read it is as follows. If you have a 3A&4A region with 9 total teams (2 from 3A and 7 from 4A), you would have 1 auto qualify from 3A (50%) and 3 slots from 4A(will not be rounded up, i.e no 3.5). What really stinks about this is the second team in 3A could have a great season but not qualify due to having a strong 4A region and not getting a wild card due to another region being heavy in 3A and light in 4A (ie 7 3A teams and 2 4a teams).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The way I read it is as follows. If you have a 3A&4A region with 9 total teams (2 from 3A and 7 from 4A), you would have 1 auto qualify from 3A (50%) and 3 slots from 4A(will not be rounded up, i.e no 3.5). What really stinks about this is the second team in 3A could have a great season but not qualify due to having a strong 4A region and not getting a wild card due to another region being heavy in 3A and light in 4A (ie 7 3A teams and 2 4a teams).

 

 

 

that is definitely a downside to this system, but it is what it is, at least for the next 4 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was looking at the district breakdowns, and I came up with a question.

In Class A, which will be comprised of 1A and 2A teams, I noticed there are some districts with only one 1A team or only one 2A team.

From what I read about the playoffs next year, you're guaranteed playoffs if you place in the top 2 in the district or if you're a 1A team and you defeat all the other 1A teams in your district. Same for 2A teams.

If there is only one 1A or 2A team in a district, do they get a guaranteed playoff spot, even if they don't win a game in the district.

They would be the top team in their class within the district.

Help me out people.

 

Yes you could have a lot of teams with losing records make the playoffs if my read is correct. In my previous example, if you had a region with 2 3A teams and 7 4A teams it could go like this. The 3A teams could lose all their games to the 4A teams along with their pickup games and the one that beats the other would automatically qualify for the playoffs with a record of 1-9 ( I hope I don't have to diagram that sentence). I could be wrong but like all things from the TSSAA, I think the scenarios were thought out poorly. a good example would be last years teams from the same region facing each other in the first round.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • Deja vu all over again, 7 yrs apart. SMDH Does anybody talk to each other?
    • OK, well, that’s because two quarterbacks can’t start. That’s football 101. The main quarterback won the starting job, so he was on varsity, and the Seymour transfer did not win the starting job. He played some varsity. He was mainly junior varsity, and he balled out when healthy, so for the starting quarterback who’s been starting varsity since his freshman year, if you have any form of proof that he’s gotten worse, somehow, whether that means stats or whatnot, please feel free to share.
    • They’ve both gotten worse. I’ve seen enough games to know that. 
    • The only two transfers that Bearden has gotten that went on to play college football were a defensive back from Karnes, who transferred here way before the new coaching staff got here, and a running back from Carter, who went on to play at Maryville College. Both players received those offers while at Bearden, and both players got a diploma from Bearden High School. Therefore, they are Bearden kids, and you can’t do anything about that.   The transfer from Seymour didn’t win the job, what do you expect two quarterbacks to start at the same time? He played great on JV when he could stay healthy, and when he came in on varsity, he did great. The quarterback position is definitely going to be in good hands when the current starting quarterback leaves, but until then, they’re just going to be battling it out like every good quarterback competition does. The current starting quarterback has his flaws, and that is in the pass game, but what he doesn’t have flaws is running and scrambling, and if you go back and watch any game, which I’m sure you didn’t watch any, we used him very often, and when we needed a deep ball, we brought in the transfer from Seymour. The starting quarterback last year will be a senior this year, and the Seymour transfer will be a junior, so the Seymour transfer is definitely going to get his spotlight. He may even win the job this year. Football isn’t about who the newspaper thinks is the best kid. The best kid in the position will win the starting job, and I trust the coaching staff more than a newspaper or article to pick my starting QB.
    • I mean, we’ve only gotten two transfers that went on to play college football, one who went to UT Martin came his second semester junior year before the new coaching staff was here, and the other one went on to play at Maryville College, in which I don’t believe he had any interest prior to transferring.
×
  • Create New...