Jump to content

New Playoff System, It's official


Govolsknox
 Share

Recommended Posts

I absolutely disagree with total number of victories being at the top. Giles non-district schedule includes 6A Cookeville along with 5A Lawrenceburg & Shelbyville. Having the guts to schedule the bigger schools will now be considered foolish. Even with this new format I look for OC to continue to schedule the larger schools. It prepares Giles better for their district. Of course if you take care of business in your district all this really doesn't matter does it? :popcorneater:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Playoff plan sucks before, blows now and will continue to do so until we go to some sort of a power point system like several states have gone too. Then you get credit for playing good teams no matter the classification...........of course the higher the classification........the more you get.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They need to quit thinking about money and:

 

1.) just go with A, AA, & AAA and take the top 2 teams from each district and go with that

 

2.) go to a 1A-6A plan and have 8 regions per class and take the top 2 teams from each region that way the system is back to a "you know what you have to do to get in" type of format

 

Four teams from each region is too many and while occasionally you may have a situation like Livingston Academy back in 2005 those times come few and far between.

 

The new system sucks worse than the Z-Plan did IMHO. It rewards horrible teams for playing horrible out of district schedules while there are going to be some solid teams that play some very tough non-district schedules left standing out in the cold.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems like all of this is just trial and error without much forethought.

 

I agree with you on this one howdoitknow. 32 teams per classification is too many. Total wins versus quality of wins is bogus. Non district games have too much of a premium put on them as 'winnable games'.

I agree 100%. This plan is as ill advised as the last one AND the coaches that scheduled up last year and signed home and away contracts for non district games are getting screwed royally this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally like the 1A-6A classification system. Most states have classes 1-6, so I beleive this is a good move.

 

I HATE the Z- Plan. SOmethin had to be changed.

I think a points system would be best as well. As bad as I hate to say it somethin that resembles the BCS would be best. I realize that the BCS SUCKS, BUT IMHO, he BCS would be perfect for high school ball, becuase of the fact that so many teams are playing up in class but on the same token A LOT are playin down in class.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a way I can understand why they changed it back in '86 but I still think it sucks. It's all about the money. I mean, you have a 2-8 team in the playoffs????? I think if they are going to keep 5 or 6 classifications then they need to back it down to the top two teams. If they go back to 3 classifications then they need to have it at top 3 teams from each Region. 1vs3 and 2vs2 from the respective regions... All this money grap is really taking away from the sport. In addition, the TSSAA completely destroyed bowl games!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't believe they removed the head to head criteria. It's nice they are getting rid of 2-8 teams but head to head should mean something. I mean, if team A went 9-1 and beat team B and team B went 9-1 and beat more .500 teams team B getting the 1 seed in that bracket kinda doesn't make sense. Let the play on the field decide too!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements

  • Recent Posts

    • A little confused.  What charter/prep schools made it to state in Baseball?  
    • Fortuitously encountering Clint amidst the ambience of Goodyear this morning sparked an impromptu yet intellectually stimulating conversation, wherein we engaged in a rigorous assessment of prospective candidates for the esteemed role of head football coach. Our discourse, characterized by its spontaneity and depth, led to the formulation of astute observations and discerning judgments regarding the suitability of various individuals for this pivotal position. Allow me to elucidate the fruits of our collaborative contemplation: This commentary endeavors to offer a discerning articulation of my subjective viewpoint, emphasizing a conscientious commitment to maintaining impartiality and refraining from any semblance of derogation directed towards individuals.  Those who possess meritorious qualifications for the esteemed head coaching role, delineated without hierarchical precedence, include: Rennard Woodmore, an esteemed alumnus of the Yellow Jackets, presents a magnificent pedigree, having held prominent positions in head coaching capacities across various regions. His pivotal role as a coordinator for teams contending for state championships further enhances his stature in the realm of football leadership. Kyle Gregory, erstwhile adorned in the resplendent gold insignia, though lacking direct head coaching experience, brings to the fore his invaluable insights garnered as a coordinator for esteemed teams, showcasing an acute understanding of the requisites for triumph whilst attired in the esteemed purple and gold regalia. Steven Jackson, whose contributions transcended mere clipboard duties under the tutelage of Kevin Creasy, emerges as an exceptional candidate for Trousdale County. His prior tenure and triumphs as an assistant coach underscore his suitability for the role. The sole drawback lies in his lack of affiliation with Trousdale County as an alumnus. Brandon Eden's extensive tenure within the chronicles of Trousdale County football, spanning a significant portion of its State Championships, coupled with his successful stints as a coordinator across diverse locales, underscores his candidacy despite a dearth of direct head coaching experience at the high school level. Davy Cothron, while beset by a modest playing career, has emerged as a luminary in offensive strategy, drawing parallels to the transformative appointment of Barker in 2015, thereby warranting consideration for his proven acumen in this realm. Joshua Hackett, notwithstanding his non-alumnus status, has left an indelible imprint across Middle Tennessee, distinguished by his adept curation of formidable defensive units as a coordinator at Watertown, albeit without direct head coaching experience. Kevin Creasy, the epitome of coaching prowess, merits an offer irrespective of his current inclinations, his unparalleled capacity to secure victories transcending geographical and institutional bounds, potentially extending to a role as Director of Schools should it align with his aspirations. Conversely, individuals who have not demonstrably earned the mantle of head coaching, enumerated without sequential precedence, encompass: Brad Waggoner David Barker Paul Pitts Jeremy Pruitt Clint Satterfield Robbie Atwood Wesley Satterfield Ben Johnson BJ West Whom do you all deem most fitting to assume the mantle of the next coach, and what rationale informs your choice? Conversely, whom do you perceive as ill-suited for the role, and what underpins your reasoning for their exclusion?
    • He's a Clinton fan.  But I wouldn't admit that either.  
    • Their any schedule out their for team camp?
    • This sums it all up to perfection.  
×
  • Create New...