Jump to content

School ball winding down, Summer Starting up


FightinIllini
 Share

Recommended Posts

I think it really depends on the level of play you have in each. I know that playing for your school and representing your community adds a component that some travel ball may not have. I and my son take pride in playing for his high school...that is all he has looked forward to since he began playing baseball. I also know that a travel team that plays together continuously, wins state and goes to world series is also a very prideful experience. The only way to accurately measure it is only if you have the same experience at each level. Some travel teams have been playing together since they were 8-9 years old...and some counties do not have school systems that have baseball until 9th grade, so they have not developed the family ties as with their travel teams. I know that I will never forget the pride I had in our travel team winning state and going to our world series and I know I would have that same pride if we went to state in high school, but we don't have that to compare to. My son would tell you that there are positives and negatives to both..he just finished high school ball and in 2 weeks starts his travel season. There are many scarifices that go into travel ball and it can be very draining, timewise and financially, but if your child wants to play at the next level I think both venues are important to play. I do agree, to a degree, with whomever said that travel is more of a player exposure event but that is what it should be on some level, because geography does play a role in exposure, and if you live somewhere that you are less likely to get exposure, travel ball is a venue for that exposure. That is not to say that the players are not concened with the team because that is not true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 29
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Good points can be made for both sides.

 

I think travel ball is too vague a distinction. I would say teams that play a regional or national schedule going out of state to premier tournaments have better competition than those that stay in state and that level is probably better than high school ball. How many 'state' tournaments are there? I agree with WCHS grad that it's tougher for A and some AA teams to get alot out of a summer schedule. They don't always have the numbers. Those guys combining to play AAA teams and Legion teams are getting better in the summer which is the way I always treated it. Getting better for..........the high school season.

 

High school ball is just better defined for most of kids. They know who the rivals are, they are playing in front of their peers. Every district game means something. I liked high school ball better when I was playing. Summer was more relaxed and guys were in and out of the lineup for work or vacations.

 

That said, the best decision my son ever made was to try out for summer teams where he didn't really know anybody. He had to prove himself, made alot of new friends and got better than he would have otherwise. The 3 years he spent with the cross county rival playing summer ball 13-15 were alot of fun. The one year of Legion ball was educational but our high school coach duplicated that by getting the high school guys to commit to a summer schedule and scheduling games with good teams. Summer ball is what you put into it and what you expect out of it. The high school players not playing summer ball are not getting better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good points can be made for both sides.

 

I think travel ball is too vague a distinction. I would say teams that play a regional or national schedule going out of state to premier tournaments have better competition than those that stay in state and that level is probably better than high school ball. How many 'state' tournaments are there? I agree with WCHS grad that it's tougher for A and some AA teams to get alot out of a summer schedule. They don't always have the numbers. Those guys combining to play AAA teams and Legion teams are getting better in the summer which is the way I always treated it. Getting better for..........the high school season.

 

High school ball is just better defined for most of kids. They know who the rivals are, they are playing in front of their peers. Every district game means something. I liked high school ball better when I was playing. Summer was more relaxed and guys were in and out of the lineup for work or vacations.

 

That said, the best decision my son ever made was to try out for summer teams where he didn't really know anybody. He had to prove himself, made alot of new friends and got better than he would have otherwise. The 3 years he spent with the cross county rival playing summer ball 13-15 were alot of fun. The one year of Legion ball was educational but our high school coach duplicated that by getting the high school guys to commit to a summer schedule and scheduling games with good teams. Summer ball is what you put into it and what you expect out of it. The high school players not playing summer ball are not getting better.

Agreed, it's all about seeing the better competition and getting better. Most HS summer teams don't have that on their agenda as yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll say this. It meant more, I think, when I was 15 and went to state and there was Babe Ruth ball or Dixie Youth ball or nothing. Same for American Legion ball in those days. There were Legion teams everywhere and the Shoetiques or Huffine's Electric, but very few travel teams like you see today. In fact, it's a watered down version today. On the other hand, our high school coach couldn't have contact with us during the summer. We had to have Legion ball to have a team or Sr. Babe Ruth to play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • Deja vu all over again, 7 yrs apart. SMDH Does anybody talk to each other?
    • OK, well, that’s because two quarterbacks can’t start. That’s football 101. The main quarterback won the starting job, so he was on varsity, and the Seymour transfer did not win the starting job. He played some varsity. He was mainly junior varsity, and he balled out when healthy, so for the starting quarterback who’s been starting varsity since his freshman year, if you have any form of proof that he’s gotten worse, somehow, whether that means stats or whatnot, please feel free to share.
    • They’ve both gotten worse. I’ve seen enough games to know that. 
    • The only two transfers that Bearden has gotten that went on to play college football were a defensive back from Karnes, who transferred here way before the new coaching staff got here, and a running back from Carter, who went on to play at Maryville College. Both players received those offers while at Bearden, and both players got a diploma from Bearden High School. Therefore, they are Bearden kids, and you can’t do anything about that.   The transfer from Seymour didn’t win the job, what do you expect two quarterbacks to start at the same time? He played great on JV when he could stay healthy, and when he came in on varsity, he did great. The quarterback position is definitely going to be in good hands when the current starting quarterback leaves, but until then, they’re just going to be battling it out like every good quarterback competition does. The current starting quarterback has his flaws, and that is in the pass game, but what he doesn’t have flaws is running and scrambling, and if you go back and watch any game, which I’m sure you didn’t watch any, we used him very often, and when we needed a deep ball, we brought in the transfer from Seymour. The starting quarterback last year will be a senior this year, and the Seymour transfer will be a junior, so the Seymour transfer is definitely going to get his spotlight. He may even win the job this year. Football isn’t about who the newspaper thinks is the best kid. The best kid in the position will win the starting job, and I trust the coaching staff more than a newspaper or article to pick my starting QB.
    • I mean, we’ve only gotten two transfers that went on to play college football, one who went to UT Martin came his second semester junior year before the new coaching staff was here, and the other one went on to play at Maryville College, in which I don’t believe he had any interest prior to transferring.
×
  • Create New...