Jump to content

Church subsidies of tuition


MountainTroll
 Share

Recommended Posts

Naw.  Ain't started a church yet, but It's a great scheme.  I'z thinkin' about the Troll Trinity Church.

Whatcha' think?  blasphemy.gif?

So . . . I wuz in the process of settin' up my church, and I thought I would check to see how the catlicks are gittin' away with it.  Here's what I found:  http://stmarysschooloakridge.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/catholic-stewardship-form-2014-2015.pdf

 

That looks like a pretty nice scheme.  If a family can afford full tuition, the family gits to make a tax-deductible contribution to the Catholic School Operating Fund, and the fund will pay an equal or greater amount to the school to subsidize a portion of that family's tuition bill.  That might not be against the T$$AA's financial aid rules, but I'm pretty sure it violates IRS laws.  (At least that's what my accountant and lawyer told me when I wanted fund my kids' tuition that way.)

 

Under Option 4, where the church directly pays a portion of a student's tuition, I cain't figger out how the T$$AA don't consider that "financial aid".  See 3. below   :rolleyes:

 

Tuition and Financial Aid

Section 16. If tuition is charged, it must be paid by parent, bona fide guardian or other family member. If a parent,

guardian or other family member secures a loan for payment of tuition, it must remain an obligation of the parents,

guardian or other family member to repay the principle and interest in full with no exceptions. Financial aid will be

allowed under the following conditions:

1. Children of full-time faculty members may be given financial aid, but such students, if transfers, shall be

ineligible for 12 months in any sport in which they have an athletic record for the previous or current year.

2. Financial aid may be awarded on the basis of need, but proof of such need must be filed in the TSSAA

office on forms approved by the Executive Director. In order to determine the basis for need, all schools

awarding financial aid shall use one of the following services in order to determine the basis for need:

FACTS Grant and Aid Assessment (FACTS), Financial Aid for School Tuition (FAST), School and Student

Scholastic Service for Financial Aid (SSS), Family Financial Needs Assessment (FFNA), Private School

Aid Services, or Smart Tuition Aid. Schools must choose one of the companies for all student-athletes. A

committee consisting of School Heads from Division II schools and one ex-officio, non-voting member

from the Board of Control and Legislative Council will meet and make recommendations to the Board of

Control on each student submitted. In addition, this committee will collect information from schools

regarding financial aid statistics, grant procedures, and the overall financial aid program within the school.

The Board of Control will then rule on all cases at the August meeting. The Board of Control shall have

authority to reject the basis of need for students when in its opinion, or in the opinion of the school

committee, the amount of need stated by the financial service cannot be justified.

3. Any loan program, grant program, educational foundation or similar program that is established and/or

administered, in whole or in part, by a school or official of a school is considered financial aid.

Schools shall remove any student from athletic eligibility whose accounts with the school are 60 days overdue.

All records pertaining to financial aid or tuition assistance shall be open to TSSAA upon its request. Each school

shall be responsible for securing necessary authorization to allow TSSAA to review or audit such records.

 

Option 5, where the church provides "Supplemental Tuition Assistance" ;) , really gits dicey.  Not only is that the definition of a Division II school, but the T$$AA requires all Division II schools to use one of several creditable companies "to determine the basis of need", not a group of Pastors.

 

http://www.knoxvillecatholic.com/site/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2013/10/2014-2015-Tuition-Support-Application-Knoxville.pdf

 

annualreport2013.jpg

 

 

smh.gif

Edited by MountainTroll
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10_5_135.gif

 

 

Let's charge every school 300$ a year and use that money to pay investigators to look into these claims.

Just a thought.

Don't need investigators.  It's a simple question that needs to be answered by the Board of Control and the Chief Executive of the T$$AA.  

 

"Are the Chattanooga Deanery Catholic Schools Education Fund and the Knoxville Region Catholic Schools Operating Fund exempt from Article II. Section 16.3 of the T$$AA By-Laws?"

3. Any loan program, grant program, educational foundation or similar program that is established and/or

administered, in whole or in part, by a school or official of a school is considered financial aid.

 

 

Maybe the T$$AA is just skeered of the catlicks and don't want to spend $3 million dollars on lawyers if Rome decides to git involved.

Roman.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't need investigators. It's a simple question that needs to be answered by the Board of Control and the Chief Executive of the T$$AA.

 

"Are the Chattanooga Deanery Catholic Schools Education Fund and the Knoxville Region Catholic Schools Operating Fund exempt from Article II. Section 16.3 of the T$$AA By-Laws?"

 

3. Any loan program, grant program, educational foundation or similar program that is established and/or

administered, in whole or in part, by a school or official of a school is considered financial aid.

 

Maybe the T$$AA is just skeered of the catlicks and don't want to spend $3 million dollars on lawyers if Rome decides to git involved.

Roman.gif

IMO it's cheating and they should go d2

IMO all privates should too

(Maybe create d3 privates not offering aid)

IMO you are correct about the fear of lawsuits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMO it's cheating and they should go d2

IMO all privates should too

(Maybe create d3 privates not offering aid)

IMO you are correct about the fear of lawsuits.

I totally agree about creating a DIII for privates not offering aid to athletes.  You don't throw them to the Lions in DII.  Some of the DII school budgets are staggering and their facilities are so far above what a small Church school could hope to achieve.   

Edited by tarp
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't want to turn this into another public vs. private thread.  I do think that there should be a public/private split, with the private division having financial aid and non-financial aid subdivisions.  I also think that OZ schools should have a multiplier.

 

The point of this thread is to ask the question of whether a church subsidizing students' tuition constitutes financial aid, as defined by the T$$AA.

 

My opinion, for what it's worth.  If a church wants to subsidize the operating budget of a school it owns to lower tuition for all students, that is fine.  If a school charges a base tuition, and the church writes a check to the school specifically subsidizing only certain students' tuition, that should be considered financial aid.  It may seem like a subtle difference, but it opens the system to abuse, and according to the T$$AA By-Laws, a church paying a portion of a student's tuition is financial aid.  Change the By-Laws to give religious organizations an exemption if you don't like it, but don't ignore the By-Laws as they are currently written.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • Recent Posts

    • RR, you might remember. Didn’t someone hide the kicking shoe that game? It seems I remember we had missed a kick the week before, and we needed all the points we could get. We thought we had a better chance going for two, so $?&@$ hid the shoe after the first miss that game. No one on our sideline looked for it very hard.
    • I will never forget the 1983 Heritage vs Maryville game. I remember driving home and listening to WGAP. Can't remember the announcers name. He asked Coach Story why he kept going for 2? Story told him " Why didn't you ask Renfro that last year"
    • TSSAA will let them all go to Mase.
    • Well nothing new, the Mustangs are really talented again this coming season!  They very well could go undefeated in regular season.  We shall see what happens in postseason.  I think the path to state title game is a little clearer than years past.  I think the Stangs are going to be really good and I think the traditional teams around in 2A are not going to be as strong.  It should be a fun season!
×
  • Create New...