Jump to content

7AAA Week 7 - Pennant Race at a Glance


davidlimbaugh
 Share

Recommended Posts

This is 100% wrong.

So we do agree it is a 2 base error. So I will assume if the batter has occupied 1st before the ball goes out of play that would put him on 3rd base if it is a 2 base error. It is under the umpires judgement whether he has occupied the bag or not. I have also saw the exact same thing happen and the exact same result happened. There must be 2 umpires and myself that can not read the rule book correctly. So therefore that is not 100% wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 28
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The rule is a two base error from the time of the pitch so when the pitch was thrown there was a runner on first so if this had been ruled correctly he would be put on third and the batter would be put on second but it was ruled incorrectly by the umpire in this case and the runner on first was allowed to score therefore that makes your first post 100% wrong  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The rule is a two base error from the time of the pitch so when the pitch was thrown there was a runner on first so if this had been ruled correctly he would be put on third and the batter would be put on second but it was ruled incorrectly by the umpire in this case and the runner on first was allowed to score therefore that makes your first post 100% wrong

 

I do agree with what you are saying but you need to read further in that rule. The next line states that if all runners, including the batter-runner, have advanced at least one base when an infielder makes a wild throw on the first play after the pitch, the award shall be governed by the position of the runners when the wild throw was made. The thing we are discussing all boils down to the umpires judgement on when the throw happens. This obviously does not make this 100% wrong when it is a judgement call. It is at least a 50% chance it is right because it is a judgement call that is in the rule book.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the player threw the ball after the batter had reached first?... come on bro.  No chance. 

 

But even if that is the "judgement call" that was made we all would assume there would be some discussion with crew and maybe a brief explanation of the call to either coach.  Neither happened.

 

Bad rule interpretation, poor and rushed execution, poor cover up attempt, oh well... Turn the page

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am pretty sure David L will post the bracket after the coaches meeting this week.

 

If the tournament is like last year:

 

Thurs:

1st round games at higher seed: #7 Lav @ #2 Blk; #6Smyrna @ #3 SC; #5Riverdale @ #4Oakland

 

Fri:

Lowest two seeds that lost on Thursday in Loser Bracket game (game may not be played at Siegel)

at Siegel

Lowest seed winner vs. Siegel

Highest seeded winners play.

 

Sat:

Losers bracket games, down to four teams after Saturday (3 teams eliminated)

 

Mon:

Winners bracket final

Loser bracket game (4th team eliminated)

 

Tues:

Loser bracket final (5th team eliminated)

 

Wed:

Championship game (+ if necessary)

 

Siegel will play in the Regionals as the regular season champ. The tournament winner (runner up if Siegel wins the tournament) also makes the Regionals.

 

Tournament champion plays at home vs. D8 runnerup in Regional semifinals.

 

That's still the most brutal losers bracket I've ever seen. Whew.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Columbia had the exact same thing happen to them and the exact same result happened. The runner on first scored. Both umpires talked it over and that was the result. They lost that game also because of that play. So maybe you are 100% wrong in saying it is not right. So if that rule is so black and white why has it cost 2 teams a game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am pretty sure David L will post the bracket after the coaches meeting this week.

 

If the tournament is like last year:

 

Thurs:

1st round games at higher seed: #7 Lav @ #2 Blk; #6Smyrna @ #3 SC; #5Riverdale @ #4Oakland

 

Fri:

Lowest two seeds that lost on Thursday in Loser Bracket game (game may not be played at Siegel)

at Siegel

Lowest seed winner vs. Siegel

Highest seeded winners play.

 

Sat:

Losers bracket games, down to four teams after Saturday (3 teams eliminated)

 

Mon:

Winners bracket final

Loser bracket game (4th team eliminated)

 

Tues:

Loser bracket final (5th team eliminated)

 

Wed:

Championship game (+ if necessary)

 

Siegel will play in the Regionals as the regular season champ. The tournament winner (runner up if Siegel wins the tournament) also makes the Regionals.

 

Tournament champion plays at home vs. D8 runnerup in Regional semifinals.

http://www.riverdalewarriors.com/baseball/images/2016/2016-7aaa-district-bracket.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So we do agree it is a 2 base error. So I will assume if the batter has occupied 1st before the ball goes out of play that would put him on 3rd base if it is a 2 base error. It is under the umpires judgement whether he has occupied the bag or not. I have also saw the exact same thing happen and the exact same result happened. There must be 2 umpires and myself that can not read the rule book correctly. So therefore that is not 100% wrong.

 

No, it is not.   Check out award table posted previously - it is 2 bases from time of PITCH - regardless of where runners are AT.  It is where they were at TIME OF PITCH.  .... 

 

I will repost:

 

BASERUNNING AWARDS TABLE:

 

TWO BASES (batter and runners):

 

First throw by infielder and ball goes out of play or lodged in or under fence - from time of PITCH 

 

(i.e. where runners and batter were at when pitcher released the ball from the rubber)

Edited by davidlimbaugh
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do agree with what you are saying but you need to read further in that rule. The next line states that if all runners, including the batter-runner, have advanced at least one base when an infielder makes a wild throw on the first play after the pitch, the award shall be governed by the position of the runners when the wild throw was made. The thing we are discussing all boils down to the umpires judgement on when the throw happens. This obviously does not make this 100% wrong when it is a judgement call. It is at least a 50% chance it is right because it is a judgement call that is in the rule book.

 

The next line you refer to is if it is the SECOND Play - i.e.  runners on first and second - ground ball to 3B - he tags third - that is FIRST Play - then throws wild to first - that is the SECOND play - that is when the 'next line' you refer to comes into play.   The FIRST bad throw by an infielder that is the FIRST PLAY is 2 bases from TIME OF PITCH.... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • The only two transfers that Bearden has gotten that went on to play college football were a defensive back from Karnes, who transferred here way before the new coaching staff got here, and a running back from Carter, who went on to play at Maryville College. Both players received those offers while at Bearden, and both players got a diploma from Bearden High School. Therefore, they are Bearden kids, and you can’t do anything about that.   The transfer from Seymour didn’t win the job, what do you expect two quarterbacks to start at the same time? He played great on JV when he could stay healthy, and when he came in on varsity, he did great. The quarterback position is definitely going to be in good hands when the current starting quarterback leaves, but until then, they’re just going to be battling it out like every good quarterback competition does. The current starting quarterback has his flaws, and that is in the pass game, but what he doesn’t have flaws is running and scrambling, and if you go back and watch any game, which I’m sure you didn’t watch any, we used him very often, and when we needed a deep ball, we brought in the transfer from Seymour. The starting quarterback last year will be a senior this year, and the Seymour transfer will be a junior, so the Seymour transfer is definitely going to get his spotlight. He may even win the job this year. Football isn’t about who the newspaper thinks is the best kid. The best kid in the position will win the starting job, and I trust the coaching staff more than a newspaper or article to pick my starting QB.
    • I mean, we’ve only gotten two transfers that went on to play college football, one who went to UT Martin came his second semester junior year before the new coaching staff was here, and the other one went on to play at Maryville College, in which I don’t believe he had any interest prior to transferring.
    • An FYI: To see how an opponent has done against another opponent since 2001- go to the game by clicking on one of the teams. Click the G beside the game. For example, Milan: The info will show you the previous matchups and other info.
    • All these college signees went yo other schools for 3 years, were getting college offers then transferred to Bearden. It’s not like this staff did much to develop them.    The BBall coaches son and the Seymour transfer were some of the most talented QBs in the region, and you guys developed them into QBs who might complete one pass a game. 
    • No my fight, but ... if they were already college-caliber prior to transferring to BHS, and they already had FBS interest, and they end up at an FBS school, how did Bearden do anything for them?
×
  • Create New...