Jump to content

Creekwood 6-1 at White House 3-4


BDP2003
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 12
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

1 hour ago, Iceman76 said:

Creekwood is BIG, FAST, and VERY PHYSICAL.  Their 21 seniors are players.  Very balanced offensively and combined with their stingy defense will make is tough for White House.  Not a close one. 42-14 Creekwood.

I seen both teams play and I can see your prediction happening 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LocoLupe said:

Worst 5 year stretch for WH in over 30 years. Missed the playoffs 4 out of 5 years. I really hope something changes soon bc its hard to watch the losses pile up. I miss WH being in the mix each year.

It’s been a rough stretch for sure. WH was in the mix last year, just fell a fake short. I think I said in August this team would win 3, maybe 4 games. This team really wasn’t supposed to be all the good because the lacked QB play. It seems to be playing out the way I feared. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, BDP2003 said:

It’s been a rough stretch for sure. WH was in the mix last year, just fell a fake short. I think I said in August this team would win 3, maybe 4 games. This team really wasn’t supposed to be all the good because the lacked QB play. It seems to be playing out the way I feared. 

With the subpar QB play to go along with all the mental mistakes and shooting ourselves in the foot it’s surprising to me that all the games have been as close as they’ve been.  Hopefully the boys will come out fighting Friday despite being heavy underdogs.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Region is setting up to be barn burner week 10.  Creekwood has Springfield at home and Central has White House Heritage at home.  If both teams win out Central will be 1 and Creekwood 2.  Central owns tie-breaker over Creekwood. Cloudy after that.  Should be Portland and Springfield? Both teams control their own desitny.  A good thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • TSSAA restrictions for hiring non-faculty coaches have been removed for over a year at this point. In the past a non-faculty person had to be "grandfathered" by being an assistant coach for five years, being fingerprinted, and having a background check run per TSSAA rules... since those were rescinded, the board of directors for the school district are responsible for any/all restrictions on hiring non-faculty personnel. I guess what I'm saying to you is that if you really wanted what you posted, it's already possible as long as your local BOE will allow for it.
    • stop it, rlh. you’re gonna get me all misty eyed and sentimental.    i see seven fairly regularly. ….but slim shady, that’s like spotting bigfoot on main street. you just hope he doesn’t spot you. 
    • Are you trying to say you didn't find Seven and ShadySlim going at it?
    • hey goat! how’s monterey looking this year?! 
    • several people actually. they said “snoball, do you know who railbird81 is on coacht?” I said, “never heard of her.” they said, “you ought to check it out they’re getting fired up on there like the old days.” well, you can imagine my disappointment when I came here expecting sharp, witty banter and all i found was more akin to toddlers slap fighting. and what looks like 1 guy/gal talking to themselves with multiple accounts.
×
  • Create New...