Jump to content

H20 @ East Robertson


Chiefbigfoot
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Chiefbigfoot said:

My son played the whole game with his jersey sleeve on the side of his pad and it didn’t get called once. Bad calls boohoo, jasper looks great in November though by the way! I’m pumped y’all get to make the trip there

You are the one complaining big dog. You won congrats it was a great game. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, H2Oman said:

In all seriousness… can someone tell me if the unnecessary roughness call on a kickoff return for a touchdown should’ve been penalized on the kickoff or were the refs right on calling the touchdown back?

Little late on this but it was unsportsmanlike penalty, right or wrong for the call is a whole other conversation, the refs got it wrong on the enforcement. Should have been play stands and penalty enforced on the kick off. Which means TD is good. H2O should have had 6 extra points at the end of 4th quarter that this play took off. Which means they’re up 12-6, end of game. H2O wins. But…… if my grandma had well you know the rest. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Merlyn said:

Little late on this but it was unsportsmanlike penalty, right or wrong for the call is a whole other conversation, the refs got it wrong on the enforcement. Should have been play stands and penalty enforced on the kick off. Which means TD is good. H2O should have had 6 extra points at the end of 4th quarter that this play took off. Which means they’re up 12-6, end of game. H2O wins. But…… if my grandma had well you know the rest. 

That’s what I thought, but I’ve been wrong before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Merlyn said:

Little late on this but it was unsportsmanlike penalty, right or wrong for the call is a whole other conversation, the refs got it wrong on the enforcement. Should have been play stands and penalty enforced on the kick off. Which means TD is good. H2O should have had 6 extra points at the end of 4th quarter that this play took off. Which means they’re up 12-6, end of game. H2O wins. But…… if my grandma had well you know the rest. 

Yes and no. The penalty was called taunting before he crossed the goal line . In result 15 yard penalty once he started the taunting from the spot. Now if he taunted in the endzone after the play . It would have been enforced on the kickoff.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, CCLHL08 said:

Yes and no. The penalty was called taunting before he crossed the goal line . In result 15 yard penalty once he started the taunting from the spot. Now if he taunted in the endzone after the play . It would have been enforced on the kickoff.  

but was it really taunting… he didn’t look back, didn’t direct it at anyone. I understand that taunting was a point of emphasis this year for officials but that was picky. IMO

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, iFootball said:

but was it really taunting… he didn’t look back, didn’t direct it at anyone. I understand that taunting was a point of emphasis this year for officials but that was picky. IMO

Only thing I saw was him holding up the #one finger we he got to the twenty. When I re watched it on FB live. Rules state when I researched it’s a referee judgement call. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CCLHL08 said:

Only thing I saw was him holding up the #one finger we he got to the twenty. When I re watched it on FB live. Rules state when I researched it’s a referee judgement call. 

I saw the same. Hard to argue any judgement call because no two people are going to see a play the same way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • I am going to assume you are not a lawyer, and most reasonable lawyers would not say the lawsuit has a zero percent chance in court. I agree with you that a coach has the ability to dismiss anyone from a team. However, Ms. Winfree was never presented with the opportunity to present her witnesses and have them tell the coaches and administrators what they heard. A lawyer could better explain the lawsuit and the grounds to you. Before you start making wild assumptions about the lawsuit, would it be too much to ask that you do a little legal research first? The lawsuit is dealing with due process, loss of property, and defamation.   You can read the lawsuit here: https://bdnewsletter.files.wordpress.com/2024/04/doc-1-complaint-filed-4-18-2024.pdf  
    • The administration took the path of backing the coach and whispering to people that the kid was a problem. The reality is that the kid was never a problem on a team or classroom. The player says she has witnessed who back her not saying the f-word.  Why did the coach make that story up and other stories? I am not Sigmund Freud and do not have an answer for the ex=-coach's behavior..  
    • I think they have they coach they want close to being done. I guess we will all see how this plays out. I hope the hire a good one. There are some players in the box for the next coach to work with. 
    • Going to grundle Troy Fleming?
    • I agree I don't think it will go to trial either, but I feel like that will be because no judge would deem this to warrant a law suit... If the school board settles, they loose and all coaches and schools loose too. 
×
  • Create New...