Rutherford Co. Championship

[lhswrasslin]

3200- hurder(siegle), Carroll (lhs 10:21), Berry(BHS), Hall(LHS10:41), Tanner(LHS (10:55))

800- Carroll(lhs- 1:58), Hill(siegle), Tanner(LHS 2:04), Hurder(siegle 2:05), hall(LHS 2:06)

1600- hurder, hill, hall, berry

4x100- lavergne

4x400- riverdale, siegle, lavergne

4x800- riverdale

high jump- Olamide(lhs) 6'0''

long jump- davis(LHS), hickman(lhs)

100- edwards(LHS)

200- edwards(LHS)

team: Lavergne 1st, riverdale 2nd

 

thats the best i can remeber right now. try to check out the lavergne track site next week for the rest

[mysteryhurdler]

dont forget tiemeyer in the 110 and 300 hurdles 3rd in each!!!

this kid has gotten better since the last time ive seen him

[saywhat?]

was this hand-timed or accutraked?

[coldcheese3]

was this hand-timed or accutraked?

you're obviously not a sprinter, saywhat?. only FAT times can be submitted for seeded races.

 

i don't see at all how you would have any interest at all in clarifying the results of a meet i'm sure you wouldn't have even heard of had you not seen it on coacht.

 

it seems as though you're just trying to run up the post counter and get on the top ten posters of the day list.

Edited May 1, 2004 by coldcheese3

[saywhat?]

yes colcheese3, and every spectator has FAT equipment built into their stopwatch

[saywhat?]

It's kinda silly that only FAT (foto automated timing) is allowed for seeded races. what if the person setting it up, kinda like the 1st guy at Doug Halls, dosnt do it right?

[obionathlete]

I was there. I think it was "accutrak"ed or "FAT"ed.