OK, Let's VOTE! Subforums or Not?

[CoachT]

The majority does not always rule on CoachT since there are times when I must do things a certain way. However, in this case I see no reason not to let the majority decide. Deadline will be at the end of 48 hours which is 7PM CST on Friday.

 

Warning: if you click View Results before you vote then you will record a null vote (no vote) and will not be able to vote in this poll. So, vote and then view results.

 

Feel free to post your reasoning, or ask questions, if you choose.

[CentralBaseball09]

I kinda don't like it because I don't think some topics are getting responses like they were. I think the reason is because people go straight to a division and neglect the other ones. If there is no subforums people see all the topics and thus might be interested.

[fieldgoal1]

There are goods and bads with each one, but the majority of the topics I want to see deal with 2A football anyway. I can go either way.

[BigBubba76]

i agree... i do like to read about how boyd buchannon is doing and how alcoa is coming along, but most of my threads that i post and read in are 4a and 5a

[BenHasRisen]

I think it should change back. Novel idea, but just too much change.

[std]

Still to thick with just 2 subforums. Had to go 3 pages to find and read a thread about an extremily important 2A game.

 

Suggestions:

1. Divide into separate subforums for each class.

2. Use a 1.8 multiplier if a subforum gets too many hits moving it up only one forum using the no 2 class jump rule.

3. Move this thread to the puplic private board.

Edited October 13, 2005 by std

[bud]

I have noticed a drop in postings in the usual threads that I visit. Although, it may seem logical to have sub-forums, I really feel like many topics are not as active because you have two groups of people that split between the 1A 2A and the 3A 4A 5A DII. Less people see less threads, and a bit less interesting is the result. Whatever we decide, I will still be around!

 

I also feel that we have lost a few posters and some (especially older posters) are easily confused.

Edited October 13, 2005 by bud

[Indian]

It's better..the "who's the best at position x" or "who will win between 1-6 team and 0-7 team" pushes back more meaningful topics.

[jabbo]

I like the subforums - it narrows down the number of posts to scroll through when a body is interested in just 5A teams, for instance.

[TankTalk]

for the subforums, don't have a reason ... just like them.

[The Sports Guy]

I like the sub forum idea! I wouldn't even mind if each class had it's own. I spend more time in 2A than anywhere else, but I scan the first 2 (newest) pages in all areas that interest me.

 

I don't post as much as a lot of people do, but I respond when I think I can help someone.

 

I spend much more time reading, but the 5 greatest wingbacks at Stump Hollow since 1932 doesn't have much to offer me. (generalization, don't try to look it up)

 

[Indian]

I think Billy Smith was a better runner at Stump Hollow than Joe Smith, and Joe is listed at 1? Billy had 150 yards in his last game aganst Possum Gap and Joe just had 140, so you can't say Joe is better.