Jump to content

strongest and weakest 1A region and why


The football feel
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 85
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

if region one is weak then why did theyat least 2 teams make to at least the second round of the playoffs and one that is still going.(Hampton)

so does region 2. the only reason region 1 has one team(hampton) is because they got lucky when the tssaa multiplier was put in effect after last year. when tssaa put the cut off number at 398, hampton became a playoff team in single a ball. they have 393 students. if they can't compete at the 'a' level then i feel sorry for them. they proved that they couldn't compete at the 'aa' level. if things were like they were last year, region 1 would have had cloudland win their first round game(maybe), but they would have lost in round two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so does region 2. the only reason region 1 has one team(hampton) is because they got lucky when the tssaa multiplier was put in effect after last year. when tssaa put the cut off number at 398, hampton became a playoff team in single a ball. they have 393 students. if they can't compete at the 'a' level then i feel sorry for them. they proved that they couldn't compete at the 'aa' level. if things were like they were last year, region 1 would have had cloudland win their first round game(maybe), but they would have lost in round two.

That stinks that we can't live in the past don't it? I guess we'll just have to live and not complain about Hampton being in 1A. I think we are supposed to be talking about the strongest and weakest regions this year, NOT THE PAST 50 YEARS. Just this year. By their records in the playoffs, both Region 1 and Region 2 have been equal. I guess we will find find out this Friday who is stronger when Hampton and Coalfield play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That stinks that we can't live in the past don't it? I guess we'll just have to live and not complain about Hampton being in 1A. I think we are supposed to be talking about the strongest and weakest regions this year, NOT THE PAST 50 YEARS. Just this year. By their records in the playoffs, both Region 1 and Region 2 have been equal. I guess we will find find out this Friday who is stronger when Hampton and Coalfield play.

The things he saws is flawed badly anyway. If Hampton were not in region 1, Cloudland would more than likely be playing Coalfield at home this week. The truth is ,this feller don't know the truth.NUFF SAID

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They just dropped down thid year. Instead of everybody complaining about Hampton dropping down, why don't we complain about Trousdale dropping down from 3A, especially when they are probably gonna win it all anyways.

 

 

 

They do, look on here if you use the search button you might find many complaints. Their excuse is moving up to three A, when classified AA like Hampton was, gave them better competition. In reality, they were dodging the privates. At least Hampton did play the cards they were dealt, even if it meant possibly playing Alcoa.

Edited by CYJacket
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • A little confused.  What charter/prep schools made it to state in Baseball?  
    • Fortuitously encountering Clint amidst the ambience of Goodyear this morning sparked an impromptu yet intellectually stimulating conversation, wherein we engaged in a rigorous assessment of prospective candidates for the esteemed role of head football coach. Our discourse, characterized by its spontaneity and depth, led to the formulation of astute observations and discerning judgments regarding the suitability of various individuals for this pivotal position. Allow me to elucidate the fruits of our collaborative contemplation: This commentary endeavors to offer a discerning articulation of my subjective viewpoint, emphasizing a conscientious commitment to maintaining impartiality and refraining from any semblance of derogation directed towards individuals.  Those who possess meritorious qualifications for the esteemed head coaching role, delineated without hierarchical precedence, include: Rennard Woodmore, an esteemed alumnus of the Yellow Jackets, presents a magnificent pedigree, having held prominent positions in head coaching capacities across various regions. His pivotal role as a coordinator for teams contending for state championships further enhances his stature in the realm of football leadership. Kyle Gregory, erstwhile adorned in the resplendent gold insignia, though lacking direct head coaching experience, brings to the fore his invaluable insights garnered as a coordinator for esteemed teams, showcasing an acute understanding of the requisites for triumph whilst attired in the esteemed purple and gold regalia. Steven Jackson, whose contributions transcended mere clipboard duties under the tutelage of Kevin Creasy, emerges as an exceptional candidate for Trousdale County. His prior tenure and triumphs as an assistant coach underscore his suitability for the role. The sole drawback lies in his lack of affiliation with Trousdale County as an alumnus. Brandon Eden's extensive tenure within the chronicles of Trousdale County football, spanning a significant portion of its State Championships, coupled with his successful stints as a coordinator across diverse locales, underscores his candidacy despite a dearth of direct head coaching experience at the high school level. Davy Cothron, while beset by a modest playing career, has emerged as a luminary in offensive strategy, drawing parallels to the transformative appointment of Barker in 2015, thereby warranting consideration for his proven acumen in this realm. Joshua Hackett, notwithstanding his non-alumnus status, has left an indelible imprint across Middle Tennessee, distinguished by his adept curation of formidable defensive units as a coordinator at Watertown, albeit without direct head coaching experience. Kevin Creasy, the epitome of coaching prowess, merits an offer irrespective of his current inclinations, his unparalleled capacity to secure victories transcending geographical and institutional bounds, potentially extending to a role as Director of Schools should it align with his aspirations. Conversely, individuals who have not demonstrably earned the mantle of head coaching, enumerated without sequential precedence, encompass: Brad Waggoner David Barker Paul Pitts Jeremy Pruitt Clint Satterfield Robbie Atwood Wesley Satterfield Ben Johnson BJ West Whom do you all deem most fitting to assume the mantle of the next coach, and what rationale informs your choice? Conversely, whom do you perceive as ill-suited for the role, and what underpins your reasoning for their exclusion?
    • He's a Clinton fan.  But I wouldn't admit that either.  
    • Their any schedule out their for team camp?
    • This sums it all up to perfection.  
×
  • Create New...