Jump to content

Ridgeway @ Millington


rhsplaya55
 Share

Recommended Posts

Should be a good game,I do think Millington will give Ridgway's run defense a test like they have not seen since the first game.I'am looking forward to see how Millington's defense will stack up agianst Ridgway this year.I dont think the players will need to read anything on here to be ready to play this game.Looking forward to a injury free and great game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Should be a good game,I do think Millington will give Ridgway's run defense a test like they have not seen since the first game.I'am looking forward to see how Millington's defense will stack up agianst Ridgway this year.I dont think the players will need to read anything on here to be ready to play this game.Looking forward to a injury free and great game.

 

i agree that ridgeway has not seen a running game the likes of millington all year, but i still do not think it will matter because Ridgeway always dominates wing-t teams as shown in their last few games against wing-t teams where those teams offenses have scored a grand total of 65 points in 10 games dating back to '02. I know many of the players that played in htese games are not around anymore, but the scheme still is and as long as the players stick to their assignments that dominant trend will continue this Friday.

A lot of talk is about the Millington rush offense against the Ridgeway defense, but a bigger factor will be if Millington's defense can stop Ridgeway's offense, which many teams have not been able to do the last 2 years. If Millington wants to have a shot at winning this game, then they must play an outstanding game on both sides of the ball.

Edited by rhsplaya55
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with you rhsplaya55.Millington will have to bring their A game to win.Was the paper correct saturday showing Bartlett with 13 yards rushing and 13 yards passing for a total of 26 yards against Ridgway?I know the defense played very well friday night,just didnt think it held them to that kinda numbers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i agree that ridgeway has not seen a running game the likes of millington all year, but i still do not think it will matter because Ridgeway always dominates wing-t teams as shown in their last few games against wing-t teams where those teams offenses have scored a grand total of 65 points in 10 games dating back to '02. I know many of the players that played in htese games are not around anymore, but the scheme still is and as long as the players stick to their assignments that dominant trend will continue this Friday.

A lot of talk is about the Millington rush offense against the Ridgeway defense, but a bigger factor will be if Millington's defense can stop Ridgeway's offense, which many teams have not been able to do the last 2 years. If Millington wants to have a shot at winning this game, then they must play an outstanding game on both sides of the ball.

Millington's only hope of slowing Ridgeway's running game is to stick 9 guys in the box, and dare 'em to pass. Frankly, if I were Millington's coach, that exactly what I'd do! Ridgeway would be forced to beat me via the pass.

 

Look, Ridgeway has NO PASSING GAME. Period. They're one dimensional (then again, so is the 48-0 University of South Panola), with star RB Crawford carrying the bulk of the offense....If Millington can somehow slow Crawford down, then they'll increase their chances of winning the game. The operative word there is "IF."

 

To be completely honest, I don't think Millington is capable of stopping Ridgeway's running game, even though everybody and his momma KNOWS that Ridgeway's gonna run the ball. Sure, Ridgeway's OL is nowhere near as big and dominant as South Panola's; Against Millington's porous defense, however, they're sure gonna look like it.

 

Millington is gonna have to gamble, big time, in order to have a snowball's chance in Hades of beating Ridgeway: Stick 9 guys in the box, every play!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Millington's only hope of slowing Ridgeway's running game is to stick 9 guys in the box, and dare 'em to pass. Frankly, if I were Millington's coach, that exactly what I'd do! Ridgeway would be forced to beat me via the pass.

 

Look, Ridgeway has NO PASSING GAME. Period. They're one dimensional (then again, so is the 48-0 University of South Panola), with star RB Crawford carrying the bulk of the offense....If Millington can somehow slow Crawford down, then they'll increase their chances of winning the game. The operative word there is "IF."

 

To be completely honest, I don't think Millington is capable of stopping Ridgeway's running game, even though everybody and his momma KNOWS that Ridgeway's gonna run the ball. Sure, Ridgeway's OL is nowhere near as big and dominant as South Panola's; Against Millington's porous defense, however, they're sure gonna look like it.

 

Millington is gonna have to gamble, big time, in order to have a snowball's chance in Hades of beating Ridgeway: Stick 9 guys in the box, every play!

 

Millington will never do that...i still dont think putting nine in will work all that wonderful because i mean you cant put all 9 on the side were running to and i believe we could still manage 3-4 yards every play so it ownt help, but if they decide to go with 9 in there and a RB breaks through...its lights out!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Millington's only hope of slowing Ridgeway's running game is to stick 9 guys in the box, and dare 'em to pass. Frankly, if I were Millington's coach, that exactly what I'd do! Ridgeway would be forced to beat me via the pass.

 

Look, Ridgeway has NO PASSING GAME. Period. They're one dimensional (then again, so is the 48-0 University of South Panola), with star RB Crawford carrying the bulk of the offense....If Millington can somehow slow Crawford down, then they'll increase their chances of winning the game. The operative word there is "IF."

 

To be completely honest, I don't think Millington is capable of stopping Ridgeway's running game, even though everybody and his momma KNOWS that Ridgeway's gonna run the ball. Sure, Ridgeway's OL is nowhere near as big and dominant as South Panola's; Against Millington's porous defense, however, they're sure gonna look like it.

 

Millington is gonna have to gamble, big time, in order to have a snowball's chance in Hades of beating Ridgeway: Stick 9 guys in the box, every play!

Ridgeways QB made some good throws last week,I think if they stick 9 in the box they are going to get beat with the pass.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Millington's only hope of slowing Ridgeway's running game is to stick 9 guys in the box, and dare 'em to pass. Frankly, if I were Millington's coach, that exactly what I'd do! Ridgeway would be forced to beat me via the pass.

 

Look, Ridgeway has NO PASSING GAME. Period. They're one dimensional (then again, so is the 48-0 University of South Panola), with star RB Crawford carrying the bulk of the offense....If Millington can somehow slow Crawford down, then they'll increase their chances of winning the game. The operative word there is "IF."

 

To be completely honest, I don't think Millington is capable of stopping Ridgeway's running game, even though everybody and his momma KNOWS that Ridgeway's gonna run the ball. Sure, Ridgeway's OL is nowhere near as big and dominant as South Panola's; Against Millington's porous defense, however, they're sure gonna look like it.

 

Millington is gonna have to gamble, big time, in order to have a snowball's chance in Hades of beating Ridgeway: Stick 9 guys in the box, every play!

 

Well that's what Bolton did and it did give us some problems. Now how does Millington stack up against Bolton?? Barlett tried a 6 man front against us and that was like putting candy in front of a baby. The ol just gave Crawford a crease and it was off to the races. He could have gained mega yards IF he hadn't twisted the ankle.

 

As for the passing, I'm sure Millington had someone there and saw the boy hit his targets. He did a real good job of selling the hand-off and rolling out for more time. As long as the coaches keep him out of the pocket he will be fine. Now that the receivers know that he can throw, they won't be surprised when the ball arrives so I expect that problem to be history. (JOKE :thumb: )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A BIGpart of the O-line did not play at Bolton,and he was missed,his replacement had never played at that pos.The o-line is not easy to play.Even if Millington stacks the box with 8 or 9 look for different results this week.

booster i wasn't at and never saw or talked anyhting ab the bolton which ones didn't play just wondering?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • Deja vu all over again, 7 yrs apart. SMDH Does anybody talk to each other?
    • OK, well, that’s because two quarterbacks can’t start. That’s football 101. The main quarterback won the starting job, so he was on varsity, and the Seymour transfer did not win the starting job. He played some varsity. He was mainly junior varsity, and he balled out when healthy, so for the starting quarterback who’s been starting varsity since his freshman year, if you have any form of proof that he’s gotten worse, somehow, whether that means stats or whatnot, please feel free to share.
    • They’ve both gotten worse. I’ve seen enough games to know that. 
    • The only two transfers that Bearden has gotten that went on to play college football were a defensive back from Karnes, who transferred here way before the new coaching staff got here, and a running back from Carter, who went on to play at Maryville College. Both players received those offers while at Bearden, and both players got a diploma from Bearden High School. Therefore, they are Bearden kids, and you can’t do anything about that.   The transfer from Seymour didn’t win the job, what do you expect two quarterbacks to start at the same time? He played great on JV when he could stay healthy, and when he came in on varsity, he did great. The quarterback position is definitely going to be in good hands when the current starting quarterback leaves, but until then, they’re just going to be battling it out like every good quarterback competition does. The current starting quarterback has his flaws, and that is in the pass game, but what he doesn’t have flaws is running and scrambling, and if you go back and watch any game, which I’m sure you didn’t watch any, we used him very often, and when we needed a deep ball, we brought in the transfer from Seymour. The starting quarterback last year will be a senior this year, and the Seymour transfer will be a junior, so the Seymour transfer is definitely going to get his spotlight. He may even win the job this year. Football isn’t about who the newspaper thinks is the best kid. The best kid in the position will win the starting job, and I trust the coaching staff more than a newspaper or article to pick my starting QB.
    • I mean, we’ve only gotten two transfers that went on to play college football, one who went to UT Martin came his second semester junior year before the new coaching staff was here, and the other one went on to play at Maryville College, in which I don’t believe he had any interest prior to transferring.
×
  • Create New...