3a Bracket

[charger05]

Somebody should donate a map to the T$$AA...I think it's obvious that they never looked at one when drawing up the original brackets...

[Bulldog Fan #2]

If the geography is truly east to west York should be in Quad 2 and Bledsoe should move to Quad 3 we are sitting in same position as AE and CAK

 

 

I don't think it is just East/West. It will also take into consideration North/South, so it is a combination of the geography to determine the quads.

[BCWARRIOR2850]

T$$AA should have just stated we will determine Quads as we deem necessary

[Solomon]

3A updated.....sorry CAK

 

http://www.tssaa.org/2009champions/stat ... racket.htm

[Solomon]

3A updated.....sorry CAK

 

http://www.tssaa.org/2009champions/stat ... racket.htm

 

I'm not surprised they went in and fixed the East quad seedings.

 

I am VERY surprised they moved CAK and Austin East.

[Gerry Bertier]

3A updated.....sorry CAK

 

http://www.tssaa.org/2009champions/stat ... racket.htm

 

TSSAA still didn't follow the video they put out. If that was the case CAK would not meet Alcoa until the Quarters. But that looks better than the first bracket.

[korn]

Re: They said they were wrong

by korn » Sat Oct 31, 2009 12:13 pm

 

From the fiasco this morning:

My prediction will be:

 

Elizabethton #1

AE #2

GP #3

 

 

CAK and AE swapping quads and CAK taking on Central as a 4 vs 5.

 

Elizabethton and AE come out good on this

CAK and GP, not so good.

 

I am sure, us(Loudon), CAK and Alcoa will be in the same quad as usual.

 

 

 

 

I hate to say I called it, but looks like I called it.

[Tab]

Why would they not meet until the quarters? I thought it said they would try to keep teams from the same district from meeting until the quarters. Elizabethton and North will probably play in round 2 also. This bracket is a lot better than the first.

[automatic]

Soloman,how did you get this updated bracket?

[Gerry Bertier]

Re: They said they were wrong

by korn » Sat Oct 31, 2009 12:13 pm

 

From the fiasco this morning:

My prediction will be:

 

Elizabethton #1

AE #2

GP #3

 

 

CAK and AE swapping quads and CAK taking on Central as a 4 vs 5.

 

Elizabethton and AE come out good on this

CAK and GP, not so good.

 

I am sure, us(Loudon), CAK and Alcoa will be in the same quad as usual.

 

 

 

 

I hate to say I called it, but looks like I called it.

 

Not to steal your thunder, but me, Tab and others were calling that as soon as they released the brackets this morning.

 

Still too many questions for my liking.

[korn]

Re: They said they were wrong

by korn » Sat Oct 31, 2009 12:13 pm

 

From the fiasco this morning:

My prediction will be:

 

Elizabethton #1

AE #2

GP #3

 

 

CAK and AE swapping quads and CAK taking on Central as a 4 vs 5.

 

Elizabethton and AE come out good on this

CAK and GP, not so good.

 

I am sure, us(Loudon), CAK and Alcoa will be in the same quad as usual.

 

 

 

 

I hate to say I called it, but looks like I called it.

 

Not to steal your thunder, but me, Tab and others were calling that as soon as they released the brackets this morning.

 

Still too many questions for my liking.

 

 

I know, I was hoping somebody would comment. Whats funny is, I found a link and was watching them make changes as they were happening. That is why I called it a prediction, I didn't want to say I ws watching it happen live.

 

Unreal......... Gerry, you done a wonderful job, although I like our chances with Bledsoe and opposite side of Alcoa. If we do get by Bledsoe and are fortunate enought to meet Polk, we know each other all too well. We scrimmage every year and did this year as well to a 14-14 tie(2 qtrs). But the TSSAA is unreal...

[Charlie Murphy]

3A updated.....sorry CAK

 

http://www.tssaa.org/2009champions/stat ... racket.htm

 

TSSAA still didn't follow the video they put out. If that was the case CAK would not meet Alcoa until the Quarters. But that looks better than the first bracket.

 

With Kingston, Alcoa, Loudon and CAK all in quad 2, someone would have to have the possibility of meeting Alcoa in round 2......I thought they were only concerned with round 1 district rematches,,,?