Jump to content

Interesting Article


fiftyfifty
 Share

Recommended Posts

Perhaps this explains some of the differences in Div II football. An article in the Nashville Tennessean about Jeff Brothers and his new job since leaving JPII, is now head coach at another private school, I forget the name of the school.

But the interesting part of the article was the revelation that JPII had 14 football players total on financial aid, and that Father Ryan had only 8 total. This was explained as the lowest number among Div II teams. I had to post this because it shows clearly that Ryan and JPII give financial aid on need based only, not to get a football player or a player for any sport for that matter. And therein is the difference fans. I was very proud to read that. :P

Edited by stbulldog
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 26
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Perhaps this explains some of the differences in Div II football. An article in the Nashville Tennessean about Jeff Brothers and his new job since leaving JPII, is now head coach at another private school, I forget the name of the school.

But the interesting part of the article was the revelation that JPII had 14 football players total on financial aid, and that Father Ryan had only 8 total. This was explained as the lowest number among Div II teams. I had to post this because it shows clearly that Ryan and JPII give financial aid on need based only, not to get a football player or a player for any sport for that matter. And therein is the difference fans. I was very proud to read that. :P

 

Perhaps there were only 14 families that qualified and there were another 20 families that applied for need based aid but did not receive it. This could be due to not making the cutoff or the money dried up from the 14 students who applied earlier.

The financial aid packet that I filled out years ago and sent to a clearing house in New Jersey, not the school, did not ask if my child was a football player, artist, singer, volleyball player etc......

Another reason JPII and FRHS have lower financial aid numbers is because they are not the top tier DII football schools so the need based financial aid parents are sending their kids to other schools with more successful programs.

If you look on the sidelines during a MBA/JPII game or a FRHS/BA there will be 30 more kids on MBA's and BA's sideline than JPII or FRHS.

WHY......traditional rich football program that kids and families want to be apart of.

So a roster of 60 kids and 14 receive aid is 23%. A roster of 90 kids and 22 receive aid is 24%.

NOT a big "REVELATION"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is the range of tuitions at the various schools?

 

Years back, I did some research based on the Form 990s filed by certain private schools. These forms showed how much aid was given and to how many students (no academic/athletic designations, of course). When calculating the average aid grant to the tuition of the school, some families on aid were still paying $8K out of pocket for their kids to attend school. What's interesting about this is that a family could be paying half-freight ($8K) to attend one DII school, and the kid would have the dreaded "scholarship" label. However, the same family could pay $8K at another DII school, and that would be full-freight (tuiton) at that school, and thus the kid would not be on aid.

 

Does a school that has a family that pays $8K towards tuition at a $15K school have an advantage over a school that has a family that pays $8K towards tuition at a $8K school?

 

Food for thought...

Edited by rollredroll
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps this explains some of the differences in Div II football. An article in the Nashville Tennessean about Jeff Brothers and his new job since leaving JPII, is now head coach at another private school, I forget the name of the school.

But the interesting part of the article was the revelation that JPII had 14 football players total on financial aid, and that Father Ryan had only 8 total. This was explained as the lowest number among Div II teams. I had to post this because it shows clearly that Ryan and JPII give financial aid on need based only, not to get a football player or a player for any sport for that matter. And therein is the difference fans. I was very proud to read that. :P

I read the article, and found it interesting. Unfortunately, the author provides no real context or definition of terms. The fact that JPII had 14 players receiving aid and Ryan 8, as compared to a minimum of 22 at other Div. II schools is almost meaningless (though I'll concede that you'd be hard put to beat either school up for recruiting, especially FR). How many players are on the team, and how does the percentage of football players reciving aid compare with the student body at large. And what exactly is "the team?" Is it the varsity, all the players in the high school, or the entire football program (noting that BA and MBA both have large 7th and 8th grade teams)?

 

It does seem to make it clear that the Catholic schools are trying to do things according to the spirit of the rules (or their recruiting director is incredibly parsimonious).

 

BTW, did you read any of the comments after the article? Absolutely toxic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps there were only 14 families that qualified and there were another 20 families that applied for need based aid but did not receive it. This could be due to not making the cutoff or the money dried up from the 14 students who applied earlier.

The financial aid packet that I filled out years ago and sent to a clearing house in New Jersey, not the school, did not ask if my child was a football player, artist, singer, volleyball player etc......

Another reason JPII and FRHS have lower financial aid numbers is because they are not the top tier DII football schools so the need based financial aid parents are sending their kids to other schools with more successful programs.

If you look on the sidelines during a MBA/JPII game or a FRHS/BA there will be 30 more kids on MBA's and BA's sideline than JPII or FRHS.

WHY......traditional rich football program that kids and families want to be apart of.

So a roster of 60 kids and 14 receive aid is 23%. A roster of 90 kids and 22 receive aid is 24%.

NOT a big "REVELATION"

Not only did you miss my point about following the rules, whether intentional or not, your reasons for number of players on sidelines is exagerrated and simply not true. You better count again at a Ryan game, many times there are 50 or more players on the field. I would call Ryan a traditionally rich football history, just not recently. You may think something else. The stats given in the article were from the TSSAA. And as I posted before, it appears that Ryan is following the rules. You are preaching to the preacher about financial aid, I have way more experience with it than I would like to admit. Your percentages are interesting at best, but probably inaccurate. I believe Ryan gives financial aid to athletes at a lower percentage than some or all of the powerhouses in Div II, thus the difference in talent level. Their financial aid is handed out need-based only as it should be, no other reason. I am proud of Ryan, we may not win every game or some seasons win any games, but when we do win, it will be with pride, honestly, and dignity. I was just informed very recently about an athlete who will enter 9th grade with a full scholarship, everything paid for, this was told to me personally by the parent. I did not mention gender or sport so no need to speculate. What school will the athlete attend, not Ryan. :)

Edited by stbulldog
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not only did you miss my point about following the rules, whether intentional or not, your reasons for number of players on sidelines is exagerrated and simply not true. You better count again at a Ryan game, many times there are 50 or more players on the field. I would call Ryan a traditionally rich football history, just not recently. You may think something else. The stats given in the article were from the TSSAA. And as I posted before, it appears that Ryan is following the rules. You are preaching to the preacher about financial aid, I have way more experience with it than I would like to admit. Your percentages are interesting at best, but probably inaccurate. I believe Ryan gives financial aid to athletes at a lower percentage than some or all of the powerhouses in Div II, thus the difference in talent level. Their financial aid is handed out need-based only as it should be, no other reason. I am proud of Ryan, we may not win every game or some seasons win any games, but when we do win, it will be with pride, honestly, and dignity. I was just informed very recently about an athlete who will enter 9th grade with a full scholarship, everything paid for, this was told to me personally by the parent. I did not mention gender or sport so no need to speculate. What school will the athlete attend, not Ryan. :)

 

That's just IT! From my limited amount of knowledge about need based financial aid, the schools don't dish out the money at their discretion. You said "I believe Ryan gives financial aid.......", they don't give it out like it's theirs to give. The family has to prove with tax returns and other financial disclosures to a clearing house that they are in "need" of the money provided by the school for tuition. Then the request for funds and the amount qualified come back to the school for approval.

My point is, just because only 8 players (per TSSAA) are on need based aid doesn't mean other schools are cheating and not following the rules. Maybe the tuition is lower than other schools and FRHS is more affordable.

Again I have limited knowledge on the subject but I have applied for it before and this is what I have been told.

I was also told no one receives 100% tuition, the parents have to provide partial payment.

It's also interesting the TSSAA and the Tennessean are trading info. Neither are DII supporters.

Also count the players on the BA, MBA, MUS, Baylor or CBHS. At least 70 to 80 players.

1997 was the last FRHS championship. If they are a top tier program then they should be in the hunt at least every other year.

I really hate this discussion on the DII messages. Let it die!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One could make that assumption from the article. However, with tuition ranging from the mid 17's-low 20's at EHS, BA, and MBA, more families need assistance to get into the school. The tuition range is significantly higher at those schools vs the parochial schools.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's just IT! From my limited amount of knowledge about need based financial aid, the schools don't dish out the money at their discretion. You said "I believe Ryan gives financial aid.......", they don't give it out like it's theirs to give. The family has to prove with tax returns and other financial disclosures to a clearing house that they are in "need" of the money provided by the school for tuition. Then the request for funds and the amount qualified come back to the school for approval.

My point is, just because only 8 players (per TSSAA) are on need based aid doesn't mean other schools are cheating and not following the rules. Maybe the tuition is lower than other schools and FRHS is more affordable.

Again I have limited knowledge on the subject but I have applied for it before and this is what I have been told.

I was also told no one receives 100% tuition, the parents have to provide partial payment.

It's also interesting the TSSAA and the Tennessean are trading info. Neither are DII supporters.

Also count the players on the BA, MBA, MUS, Baylor or CBHS. At least 70 to 80 players.

1997 was the last FRHS championship. If they are a top tier program then they should be in the hunt at least every other year.

I really hate this discussion on the DII messages. Let it die!

This is a perfectly reasonable topic for the Div II board, given that financial aid is the reason that Div !! exists. I believe you're correct in the assertion that the schools can give no more aid than the folks in Princeton determine is appropriate. However, I don't believe the independent body's determination that I can recieve $1,000 in aid obligates Ryan to provide that much to me. I would assume that the lion's share, if not all of the financial aid money would go to Catholic students: Ryan's mission, first and foremost, is to provide a Catholic education. I would expect that the financial aid money would go there first (chime in if you know better, sts...). And while the tuition at Ryan is probably less than that of MBA and EHS (no idea what it is for BA), I'm guessing that there are more sibling groups at Ryan than the other schools.

 

It's easy to take shots at Ryan's football record, but it ignores the fact that the Div II teams they play, especially the local ones, are excellent programs. If MBA, BA, EHS, and Ryan compete in the same division, someone comes out 4th, no matter how good they are. And Ryan was most definitely in the hunt last year. An 8 point loss in the semi-final to the eventual winner is a good season, any way you slice it. Had the TSSAA mainatined a sensible alignment given the size of state (3 classifications, each with 16 districts), I think Ryan would have remained at or very near the top of their deistrict, a spot they inhabited from the inception of the distruct system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The following is what I found when researching tuition cost. Keep in mind that some schools include books, lunch, class rings, athletic fees, etc... into the tuition cost and some charge extra for all of those items.

 

McCallie (20,245 for day student & 37,955 for boarding)

 

Memphis University School (16,750)

 

Baylor (19,536 for day student & 39,790 for boarding)

 

Father Ryan (10,185 for Catholic contribution to parish, 11,485 for Catholic with no contribution & 14,630 for non Catholics)

 

Pope John Paul II (9,950 for Catholic contribution to parish & 11,425 for everyone else)

 

Montgomery Bell Academy (19,625)

 

Brentwood Academy (17,200)

 

Ensworth (19,200)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's just IT! From my limited amount of knowledge about need based financial aid, the schools don't dish out the money at their discretion. You said "I believe Ryan gives financial aid.......", they don't give it out like it's theirs to give. The family has to prove with tax returns and other financial disclosures to a clearing house that they are in "need" of the money provided by the school for tuition. Then the request for funds and the amount qualified come back to the school for approval.

My point is, just because only 8 players (per TSSAA) are on need based aid doesn't mean other schools are cheating and not following the rules. Maybe the tuition is lower than other schools and FRHS is more affordable.

Again I have limited knowledge on the subject but I have applied for it before and this is what I have been told.

I was also told no one receives 100% tuition, the parents have to provide partial payment.

It's also interesting the TSSAA and the Tennessean are trading info. Neither are DII supporters.

Also count the players on the BA, MBA, MUS, Baylor or CBHS. At least 70 to 80 players.

1997 was the last FRHS championship. If they are a top tier program then they should be in the hunt at least every other year.

I really hate this discussion on the DII messages. Let it die!

I will post what I want. I do find it interesting that you mention the word cheating. I certainly never mentioned it. You may have been told that no one receives 100& tuition, and that is true as far as the clearinghouse that privates use go. But I can assure you that some athletes receive 100% percent one way or another. Your statement about the TSSAA and the Tennessean is a little naive. The TSSAA gave the stats, they are what they are concerning aid. In your post you said you find this or that interesting. Thats the title of this thread, Interesting Article. I am asserting that Ryan athletes are treated just like everyone else, thus there would be no reason for an inflated number of them receiving aid and that is what I am proud of. And if you don't like it, tough. :) One last point Skinthefat, if you think a school can't manipulate aid, I have some property in the desert I would like to sell you. You just happen to be attending a school that refuses to bend the rules at all, that what I am proud of.

Edited by stbulldog
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a perfectly reasonable topic for the Div II board, given that financial aid is the reason that Div !! exists. I believe you're correct in the assertion that the schools can give no more aid than the folks in Princeton determine is appropriate. However, I don't believe the independent body's determination that I can recieve $1,000 in aid obligates Ryan to provide that much to me. I would assume that the lion's share, if not all of the financial aid money would go to Catholic students: Ryan's mission, first and foremost, is to provide a Catholic education. I would expect that the financial aid money would go there first (chime in if you know better, sts...). And while the tuition at Ryan is probably less than that of MBA and EHS (no idea what it is for BA), I'm guessing that there are more sibling groups at Ryan than the other schools.

 

It's easy to take shots at Ryan's football record, but it ignores the fact that the Div II teams they play, especially the local ones, are excellent programs. If MBA, BA, EHS, and Ryan compete in the same division, someone comes out 4th, no matter how good they are. And Ryan was most definitely in the hunt last year. An 8 point loss in the semi-final to the eventual winner is a good season, any way you slice it. Had the TSSAA mainatined a sensible alignment given the size of state (3 classifications, each with 16 districts), I think Ryan would have remained at or very near the top of their deistrict, a spot they inhabited from the inception of the distruct system.

K,

 

As always a good level and common sense post. You know and I know that success doesn't always mean you win it all. By the way, the player that has been told they would be receiving a full ride is not just tuition, but books, meals, everything. And guess what, its not Ryan or MBA, no more on this. I would not make this up. :) Oh I almost forgot, non catholic students qualify for financial aid same as Catholic students. There are many siblings at Ryan, always have been.

Edited by stbulldog
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • They’ve both gotten worse. I’ve seen enough games to know that. 
    • The only two transfers that Bearden has gotten that went on to play college football were a defensive back from Karnes, who transferred here way before the new coaching staff got here, and a running back from Carter, who went on to play at Maryville College. Both players received those offers while at Bearden, and both players got a diploma from Bearden High School. Therefore, they are Bearden kids, and you can’t do anything about that.   The transfer from Seymour didn’t win the job, what do you expect two quarterbacks to start at the same time? He played great on JV when he could stay healthy, and when he came in on varsity, he did great. The quarterback position is definitely going to be in good hands when the current starting quarterback leaves, but until then, they’re just going to be battling it out like every good quarterback competition does. The current starting quarterback has his flaws, and that is in the pass game, but what he doesn’t have flaws is running and scrambling, and if you go back and watch any game, which I’m sure you didn’t watch any, we used him very often, and when we needed a deep ball, we brought in the transfer from Seymour. The starting quarterback last year will be a senior this year, and the Seymour transfer will be a junior, so the Seymour transfer is definitely going to get his spotlight. He may even win the job this year. Football isn’t about who the newspaper thinks is the best kid. The best kid in the position will win the starting job, and I trust the coaching staff more than a newspaper or article to pick my starting QB.
    • I mean, we’ve only gotten two transfers that went on to play college football, one who went to UT Martin came his second semester junior year before the new coaching staff was here, and the other one went on to play at Maryville College, in which I don’t believe he had any interest prior to transferring.
    • An FYI: To see how an opponent has done against another opponent since 2001- go to the game by clicking on one of the teams. Click the G beside the game. For example, Milan: The info will show you the previous matchups and other info.
    • All these college signees went yo other schools for 3 years, were getting college offers then transferred to Bearden. It’s not like this staff did much to develop them.    The BBall coaches son and the Seymour transfer were some of the most talented QBs in the region, and you guys developed them into QBs who might complete one pass a game. 
×
  • Create New...