Jump to content

CAMDEN?


camdenfish
 Share

Recommended Posts

New head coach, undersized, not playing like a team that's been in the top ten for the last 6 years or so. What's going on? Is it discipline? Lack of talent? Small defensive line? Offensive line? Or just lack of how to run the explosive offense that Camden has?

You tell me.

 

 

If you don't have explosive players on an offense, then you don't have an explosive offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

New head coach, undersized, not playing like a team that's been in the top ten for the last 6 years or so. What's going on? Is it discipline? Lack of talent? Small defensive line? Offensive line? Or just lack of how to run the explosive offense that Camden has?

You tell me.

 

 

New Coach, smaller line than the past,talent(lack of), all these are possiblity's. You ever thought about YOUTH? This is the youngest team they have had in years. My numbers may be off by one or two, but there is only 9 seniors on this team, only 8 playing( one injured from start of season) if im not correct only one senior on the O line. Lot of Jr's and some sophmores, So maybe just back this team, they are improving, and I believe will have a great district run, cant overlook anyone.

Edited by BlackGoldDad
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Young team like said eariler.With 42 freshmen on the roster lookout in a few years.I went to the freshmen's game last night,and one thing bugged me.The coach was playing his son at quarterback when he has one of the best quarterbacks Ive seen play in Jr High in years Caleb Rushing. He got hurt last night playing a different position.I have no connections with the Rushings and just a fan of Camden Football and was ticked not to see who I thought would be leading the team.Family first I guess.

Edited by CamdenBottoms
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it is a culmination of several factors. First of all, having a "new" coach isn't exactly a correct term. He was the offensive coordinator last year. You have a group of kids that don't belive in him like they did in Kevin Ward. That makes a big difference. IF A TEAM HAS NO FAITH IN THE ABILITY OF THE COACH, THEY WILL NOT PLAY HARD FOR HIM. Now this isn't just my opinion, this is from players mouths. Coach Blow is going to have to earn those players trust for them to play with their full potential.

 

Coach Blow is trying to implement some variety in the wing-T offense and that is well and good, but you cannot do this and cost yourself a win against a weaker Westview team than the ones from previous years. Westview loss was imbarassing(with no offense to any westview players or fans/parents. Just saying that as an overall group) The Huntingdon loss was to a very good football team, but onside kick was a botched effort. The talent on Camden's offensive line and defensive line is not what it has been over the past couple years due to Jordan Murphy and the other seniors graduating and their size is way down. They have good kids, just not big kids like everyone else they have played. Camden has been outweighed on the line in every matchup this year. Had more heart than Lipscomb, more talent in more places than Cheatham Co. Then you put in the fact that the RBs are smaller this year and not as bruising as last year. The bruising RBs don't get to run till the end of the third or fourth quarter (#35 & #44). QB is not as moblie as in the past three years so that removes another threat from picking up large chunks of yards. WRs have great hands but not alot of speed and doesn't seem like Coach Blow wants to let Tanner drop back and throw the ball from a 5 step or 7 step drop. Always wants to fake two or three times and roll him out. Can't do that stuff on obvious passing downs. Defense doesn't fall for that and tends to get your QB sacked or hurried. Screen play they have is terrible cause it is thrown into the heart of the defense in the middle of the field. Screens are successful when a RB or TE can get the edge and go and not when they are bottled up into a funnel shaped vortex. You can never, NEVER have a consistant blocking scheme in plays like that.

Overall, the problem is that Camden is not as good as last year. Talent, Coaching, Players....It's a very different team. Start adding up the small differences from last year, and you get a big change in performance on the field. Camden is probably looking at some down years to come from what I have seen. That's just my opinion so don't get your feathers ruffled Camden fans...I'm as fanatical as they come for the Lions.

Edited by matt_8777
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it is a culmination of several factors. First of all, having a "new" coach isn't exactly a correct term. He was the offensive coordinator last year. You have a group of kids that don't belive in him like they did in Kevin Ward. That makes a big difference. IF A TEAM HAS NO FAITH IN THE ABILITY OF THE COACH, THEY WILL NOT PLAY HARD FOR HIM. Now this isn't just my opinion, this is from players mouths. Coach Blow is going to have to earn those players trust for them to play with their full potential.

 

Coach Blow is trying to implement some variety in the wing-T offense and that is well and good, but you cannot do this and cost yourself a win against a weaker Westview team than the ones from previous years. Westview loss was imbarassing(with no offense to any westview players or fans/parents. Just saying that as an overall group) The Huntingdon loss was to a very good football team, but onside kick was a botched effort. The talent on Camden's offensive line and defensive line is not what it has been over the past couple years due to Jordan Murphy and the other seniors graduating and their size is way down. They have good kids, just not big kids like everyone else they have played. Camden has been outweighed on the line in every matchup this year. Had more heart than Lipscomb, more talent in more places than Cheatham Co. Then you put in the fact that the RBs are smaller this year and not as bruising as last year. The bruising RBs don't get to run till the end of the third or fourth quarter (#35 & #44). QB is not as moblie as in the past three years so that removes another threat from picking up large chunks of yards. WRs have great hands but not alot of speed and doesn't seem like Coach Blow wants to let Tanner drop back and throw the ball from a 5 step or 7 step drop. Always wants to fake two or three times and roll him out. Can't do that stuff on obvious passing downs. Defense doesn't fall for that and tends to get your QB sacked or hurried. Screen play they have is terrible cause it is thrown into the heart of the defense in the middle of the field. Screens are successful when a RB or TE can get the edge and go and not when they are bottled up into a funnel shaped vortex. You can never, NEVER have a consistant blocking scheme in plays like that.

Overall, the problem is that Camden is not as good as last year. Talent, Coaching, Players....It's a very different team. Start adding up the small differences from last year, and you get a big change in performance on the field. Camden is probably looking at some down years to come from what I have seen. That's just my opinion so don't get your feathers ruffled Camden fans...I'm as fanatical as they come for the Lions.

 

Sounds to me like you have things figured out. How about sending Coach Blow your resume and getting on the staff (insert sarcasm here) next season? Camden will be fine.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it is a culmination of several factors. First of all, having a "new" coach isn't exactly a correct term. He was the offensive coordinator last year. You have a group of kids that don't bjielive in him like they did in Kevin Ward. That makes a big difference. IF A TEAM HAS NO FAITH IN THE ABILITY OF THE COACH, THEY WILL NOT PLAY HARD FOR HIM. Now this isn't just my opinion, this is from players mouths. Coach Blow is going to have to earn those players trust for them to play with their full potential.

 

Coach Blow is trying to implement some variety in the wing-T offense and that is well and good, but you cannot do this and cost yourself a win against a weaker Westview team than the ones from previous years. Westview loss was imbarassing(with no offense to any westview players or fans/parents. Just saying that as an overall group) The Huntingdon loss was to a very good football team, but onside kick was a botched effort. The talent on Camden's offensive line and defensive line is not what it has been over the past couple years due to Jordan Murphy and the other seniors graduating and their size is way down. They have good kids, just not big kids like everyone else they have played. Camden has been outweighed on the line in every matchup this year. Had more heart than Lipscomb, more talent in more places than Cheatham Co. Then you put in the fact that the RBs are smaller this year and not as bruising as last year. The bruising RBs don't get to run till the end of the third or fourth quarter (#35 & #44). QB is not as moblie as in the past three years so that removes another threat from picking up large chunks of yards. WRs have great hands but not alot of speed and doesn't seem like Coach Blow wants to let Tanner drop back and throw the ball from a 5 step or 7 step drop. Always wants to fake two or three times and roll him out. Can't do that stuff on obvious passing downs. Defense doesn't fall for that and tends to get your QB sacked or hurried. Screen play they have is terrible cause it is thrown into the heart of the defense in the middle of the field. Screens are successful when a RB or TE can get the edge and go and not when they are bottled up into a funnel shaped vortex. You can never, NEVER have a consistant blocking scheme in plays like that.

Overall, the problem is that Camden is not as good as last year. Talent, Coaching, Players....It's a very different team. Start adding up the small differences from last year, and you get a big change in performance on the field. Camden is probably looking at some down years to come from what I have seen. That's just my opinion so don't get your feathers ruffled Camden fans...I'm as fanatical as they come for the Lions.

I understand that he was off cord. Longer than just last season. Blow has been in Camden for awhile. A new "head"coach is what I ment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm embarrassed that I even read all the way through this thread. If you want to belittle the team and the coaching staff, by all means that is your right, but not in this format. The kids get on there and read this crap and see that you don't give them or their coaches a chance. You have a lot of talented sofomores and freshemen standing on the sideline and a few seeing regular playing time. I believe in this team and although I may not agree with everything coach Blow does I'm going to support him and this team. Coach Blow is not Coach Ward so don't expect him to be. I believe he's going to be fine, but he and this team need to find their identity and when they do we will see just what they are capable of.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So should I answer the question or should I candy coat some answer to make people feel good? I'm a realist and I speak my mind on a PUBLIC forum. I am not bashing the Lions. I love my football team and I go to every game no matter where it is and will support them just like I did when they were going 3-7. Coach Blow isn't made of sugar. He won't melt in the rain. If he didn't want to be under the microscope, he shouldn't have taken the position. When the team loses, most fans look to the coach. I don't place blame on anyone. I look at all factors to base my judgement on a culmination of all the issues that we have. This team is a good team and they will get better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So should I answer the question or should I candy coat some answer to make people feel good? I'm a realist and I speak my mind on a7 PUBLIC forum. I am not bashing the Lions. I love my football team and I go to every game no matter where it is and will support them just like I did when they were going 3-7. Coach Blow isn't made of sugar. He won't melt in the rain. If he didn't want to be under the microscope, he shouldn't have taken the position. When the team loses, most fans look to the coach. I don't place blame on anyone. I look at all factors to base my judgement on a culmination of all the issues that we have. This team is a good team and they will get better.

Good post. Im not saying he is a bad head coach. I like the guy. I just think if he is going to be head coach, he should give up his off. cord position and stick with head coach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • Pirates can make a run at the dance for sure.
    • I've always been a football fan first and then if you have a band that's awesome.No question that DB has one of the best bands in the country and the whole region should attend at least one DB game just to see their band. I don't know if Nick Saban could come to Kingsport and build a football program that could match the Dobyns Bennett band's success.That said,as mentioned before, a couple of things would have to change in order for the Tribe to just win a state championship on the field.Besides a program that starts from the peewee teams and goes all the way to J Fred with all coaches and weight training { in time }on the same page. Sometimes it also takes a little luck like the 1998 Vols .There are a lot of great athletes at a lot of big schools around the state and just because you want something doesn't mean your going to build a program like Alcoa has. Yes,start at the bottom and have guys that are quality coaches teaching at every level is 100% the first step. Parents can make it a lot easier by getting their young athletes into an early start with conditioning and weights as well when they are old enough to lift.If your son is a man in the weight room before he gets to DB , then it won't take a "Dobbs" coach to make him competitive against other schools athletes when it comes to strength.
    • Dyersburg scrimmaged South Gibson last week
    • A complete cultural change happened at Greeneville and the administration and community opened up their checkbooks.  What a lot of people don't know is Ballard was Zeller's OC for many years and stopped coaching for two years because Zeller and Ballard didn't see eye to eye on some things.  Zeller lead Greeneville to it's first ever Semi Final appearance in 2000 and lost 28-12 at Maryville and had them in the Quarter Finals in 2002 and 2003.  Z was a great coach but lost some control when it came to making workouts mandatory. (He learned from that Mistake and it was at LC when i coached with him.).  Z was let go going into my Senior Year and was replaced by Steve McCurry who was the one that turned the program around.  Steve had won a 4a state championship at AC Reynolds in Asheville and made the administration completely redo the weight room with new equipment, had a football period at the end of the school day to lift, started devil camp, and brought in coaches like Danny Bentley (Still the OL coach), Ballard as the OC, Cody Baugh (QB coach and still there), and even Spradlen who is Greeneville's head coach now as the DB's Coach.  McCurry only coached for two seasons at Greeneville and took a team that had a losing record the year before and finished my Senior Year making it to the Quarters and having a 10-3 record and then followed it up with a Semi Final appearance the next year with an 11-3 record and back to back conference championships.  Loved McCurry to death but the recession hit and the story i heard was he was still buying new equipment for the team that the Principal didn't authorize and his response was "I don't answer to you and only to Niswonger and Bewley" (Two huge donors).  That was it for him and they Promoted Ballard shortly after that.   Greeneville had always been relevant ever since the the late 70's under Coach Fred Sorrell's.  Since Sorrell's took over in 1977 Greeneville overall winning percentage is over 76%.  The biggest reason people might not have thought Greeneville was "Good" until Ballard was Greeneville always played up Classification wise and could never get over the hump. (When there were 3 classifications we played 3a, when it went to 5 we played 4a).  Greeneville is the largest its ever been with 953 students and where playing teams 2 or 3 times there size back in the day (I had a little over 800 kids in the school when i graduated in 2008).  Other teams always would know they would be sore after a game but depth took over and never won a Championship until Greeneville played in the classification the TSSAA actually assigned them. You had names like Dustin Moore (1993 Mr Football for 3a and who Phillip Fulmer said was one of the greatest athletes he ever recruited), James "Mud Turtle" Mayes, Brigham Lyons, Byron Gillespie, Frankie Debusk (National Champion Qb at Furman with GQ), Jasmine Lowery, Cody Baugh, The Greenway Brothers, Joe Watson (Furman), etc.  Now the cultural is from the Pee Wee league up and you grow up as a young kid wanting to wear the Greene and White.  Here is a really good link when it comes to anything Greeneville Football related. https://greenevillefootball.com/   I also don't coach anymore.  Z told me i was to smart with how the school systems are ran these days and ended up going into real estate in Knoxville which has been a great decision for my life.
    • Yes, they will. I'm wondering what kinds of strides Sale Creek will make heading into the second season under Coach Fitz.
×
  • Create New...