Jump to content

Expected Impact of BBCOR Bats on HS Baseball


sportsnutdad
 Share

Recommended Posts

I would like to see a discussion of everyone thinks the new bats will impact the various areas of the game, and some teams more than others. For example, David Lipscomb (reigning Class AA State Champions), has always made a practice of generating runs utilizing bunting, hit-and-run, smart and agressive base running, etc.. I think DL as a team will be impacted less than some other teams, who have relied on "the long ball". Thoughts? Opinions?

Edited by sportsnutdad
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Based on what I saw last year at the D2 college level, it will change the game drastically. Depending on the field size, only strong hitters will be able to hit HRs, and they will have to catch it pretty pure to get it out of a field of any size. The HRs will drop by at least half. Small ball will become much more important than in the past.

 

The defensive side will be affected as well, because the teams with good outfielders will have a big advantage. The outfielders will have to play in to try and stop all the garbage hits from falling, so the ability to go back on a ball and run it down will be much more important.

 

They are pretty much like wooden bats. Only balls struck on the sweet spot have any juice, and the rest go nowhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMHO, it will become baseball again.

 

Pitching and defense and the ability to move runners up (bunting) will take on much more importance.

 

The only thing better would have been to go back to wood bats.

I agree, that it's back to where it should be. It will still impact the game in many areas, but I don't believe most players have thought anything about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The new bat rule is way overdue - IMHO. It will speed up the games and make it much more like real baseball - pitching, defense, bunting, stealing, hit and run.

The concern is that I have already heard of some bats being "modified" by taking out the inside rings etc. that make them compliant. How will that be regulated?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In high school baseball the teams with the best staffs and played the best defense have usually had the most success. This will not change. The trend I hear is that "small ball" will come "back." I am of the opinion that it has not gone that far away. Home runs will be down considerably and miss hit balls will travel less and the jam job bloopers will be down. In order to play "small ball," someone must first get on base. To me, teaching players to drive ball through or over infielders is going to be the biggest change. For decades, swinging to hit the top of the ball to produce ground balls will be more futile with the less responsive bats. Several studies have shown that close to 80 percent of all at bats are classified as "normal" at bats. In that, there is no cause for "small ball." The key to me is having players develop swings that produce longer groundballs, balls that hit in the dirt or beyond, and balls that are driven over the infield defenders. At some point the first guy has to get on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The new bat rule is way overdue - IMHO. It will speed up the games and make it much more like real baseball - pitching, defense, bunting, stealing, hit and run.

The concern is that I have already heard of some bats being "modified" by taking out the inside rings etc. that make them compliant. How will that be regulated?

 

I don't think that can be regulated which is sad. There are companies you can find on the internet who will make the inner walls thinner to make bats more responsive already. I have witnessed a college game where a team was thought to have done this and the results were noticeable. The answer is to go back to wood and have an X-ray machine on site to check for corked bats. I have done some research and am woking on perfecting that ala Norm Cash in 1961.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • They’ve both gotten worse. I’ve seen enough games to know that. 
    • The only two transfers that Bearden has gotten that went on to play college football were a defensive back from Karnes, who transferred here way before the new coaching staff got here, and a running back from Carter, who went on to play at Maryville College. Both players received those offers while at Bearden, and both players got a diploma from Bearden High School. Therefore, they are Bearden kids, and you can’t do anything about that.   The transfer from Seymour didn’t win the job, what do you expect two quarterbacks to start at the same time? He played great on JV when he could stay healthy, and when he came in on varsity, he did great. The quarterback position is definitely going to be in good hands when the current starting quarterback leaves, but until then, they’re just going to be battling it out like every good quarterback competition does. The current starting quarterback has his flaws, and that is in the pass game, but what he doesn’t have flaws is running and scrambling, and if you go back and watch any game, which I’m sure you didn’t watch any, we used him very often, and when we needed a deep ball, we brought in the transfer from Seymour. The starting quarterback last year will be a senior this year, and the Seymour transfer will be a junior, so the Seymour transfer is definitely going to get his spotlight. He may even win the job this year. Football isn’t about who the newspaper thinks is the best kid. The best kid in the position will win the starting job, and I trust the coaching staff more than a newspaper or article to pick my starting QB.
    • I mean, we’ve only gotten two transfers that went on to play college football, one who went to UT Martin came his second semester junior year before the new coaching staff was here, and the other one went on to play at Maryville College, in which I don’t believe he had any interest prior to transferring.
    • An FYI: To see how an opponent has done against another opponent since 2001- go to the game by clicking on one of the teams. Click the G beside the game. For example, Milan: The info will show you the previous matchups and other info.
    • All these college signees went yo other schools for 3 years, were getting college offers then transferred to Bearden. It’s not like this staff did much to develop them.    The BBall coaches son and the Seymour transfer were some of the most talented QBs in the region, and you guys developed them into QBs who might complete one pass a game. 
×
  • Create New...