Jump to content

2A Memphis Mitchell..... Look Out!


Intense
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Well if we wre a 1 or 2 school county we would not have that problem. Yes we have open enrollment for kid leaving middle school. Sorry you do not like it. The parents choose to bring their kids here, but from now on in honor of you devilfanatic we will tell the parents no thanks.

You can make fun of my post all you want but the fact is TSSAA lets Memphis play by a different set of rules. When you're in a rural setting it is county but when you're in a metropolitan area of the state you are zoned in any other city. Its an unfair advantage and you know it. If you're going to have open enrollment in one city then it needs to be that way in ever city. Why not just have it state wide, one state championship and may the best team and coach win. Everyone talks about how dominant Memphis is, well when you have 1 million kids to choose from its not hard to win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can make fun of my post all you want but the fact is TSSAA lets Memphis play by a different set of rules. When you're in a rural setting it is county but when you're in a metropolitan area of the state you are zoned in any other city. Its an unfair advantage and you know it. If you're going to have open enrollment in one city then it needs to be that way in ever city. Why not just have it state wide, one state championship and may the best team and coach win. Everyone talks about how dominant Memphis is, well when you have 1 million kids to choose from its not hard to win.

Alcoa and Maryville have been winning state championships for decades using the "open zoning model". Last year Beech joined in the fun. I agree that it is unfair to schools that are traditionally zoned, but at this point I am not sure that there is anything you can do about it, since most of the D1 champions seem to come from the open zoning concept. It would not affect Maryville, but perhaps a multiplier (as applied to the D1 privates) would be appropriate?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Devilfanatic I feel parents should have the option on enrolling thier children in the best school for their child. The top 6 schools in Memphis that had the most open enrollment transfers White Station, Ridgeway, Whitehaven, Mitchell, Overton and Southwind are not on the state takeover list. That is the reason most parents take advantage of this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Devilfanatic I feel parents should have the option on enrolling thier children in the best school for their child. The top 6 schools in Memphis that had the most open enrollment transfers White Station, Ridgeway, Whitehaven, Mitchell, Overton and Southwind are not on the state takeover list. That is the reason most parents take advantage of this.

Galilee, I wholeheartedly agree with Redrobin. There should be a multiplier on the public schools that have open enrollment. Example, Mitchell has 530 students according to the last TSSAA reclassification. TCA has 235. We are hit with a 1.8 multiplier. Mitchell has 535 students and who knows how many of those came to Mitchell out of zone. How can a small school like TCA, Clarksburg, Greenfield, etc compete with a school that has 2.5x the students? We have to assume some of those came by choice due to athletics, etc. There is no way that is fair. Madison Coumty is now open zone as well and I think they should be hit with the multiplier. You will see one or two dominant schools in Madison County in the next two years. It will probably be Liberty and Southside. Mitchell will probably have an allstar AAU team on the basketball floor. How in the world can the Greenfield's, Halls, and Scott's Hills of the world compete? It's simple. They can't. When Mitchell plays against other schools who have an open enrollment environment(CPA) they typically have a competitive game. I'm using Mitchell as an example since they are 2A. Same could be said about Ridgeway, Southwind, etc. TSSAA needs to correct this ASAP!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What you all are saying does make sense. TCA has a big advantage also. You all can decide which stuents you allow to enroll in your school. If a child lives in our district we must take them. LIke you aid about Mitchell, their are some students enrolled at TCA because of athletics. Any public school an can make an argument but private schools.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What you all are saying does make sense. TCA has a big advantage also. You all can decide which stuents you allow to enroll in your school. If a child lives in our district we must take them. LIke you aid about Mitchell, their are some students enrolled at TCA because of athletics. Any public school an can make an argument but private schools.

Yes but they have to pay to attend which narrows the pool. My point is that we are assessed a multiplier which is fine but so should open zoned schools. This keeps it equal and fair. I would argue that 1.8 is ridiculous. 1.4 is more reasonable. TSSAA has the highest multiplier in the nation. Average is 1.4. I don't necessarily think the multiplier shoul be 1.8 on the open zoned public schools but they should have something....maybe 1.2 or 1.3. This would equalize things and keep the real small schools competitive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TSSAA is a broken organization when it comes to governing schools, there is no representation for the small schools on the board. The only way to make this fair is to make any school system that has "open zoning" and the private schools play at the highest classification in every sport if they are D1 and allow the small privates to go to D2 to allow a level playing field for them. Over here everyone makes a big stink when ONE kid moves to a different school and their parents have to move in order for that child to not be penalized yet in Memphis, Marville, etc... 50 can move in with nothing said. How is this fair? TSSAA is like our government, biased and leaning heavily towards big business (i.e. large schoos and private institutions) and both are VERY BROKEN!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Intense y'all keep winning its gonna be a 2.0 multiplier!!

Not sure how to take that comment! We'll be winning quite often for the next three years and then have a temporary drop off for a year or two then the 5th, 6th and 7 th grade class will be maturing into freshmen, Sophs and Juniors and oh boy can they play!! Pretty good talent for only 235 kids BUT we will always have a year or two that we have to rebuild and struggle. A rebuilding year for us is 3-7. A rebuilding year for Aville is 7-3 or maybe 6-4. All due to number of students. It's just the way it is and we have to accept it. Adamsvillle shouldn't have to rebuild with the momentum they have going. Success breeds success! I still think the Cards have to be factored in as one of top 4 favored teams to win it all this year. At least top 5. I'm still just not sure about Mitchell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • Yeah.  Kids only transfer in and out of Bearden these days, you know.   That particular poster evidentially has a personal vendetta with Josh Jones.   Consider the source.  And the kid transferring to McCallie is a terrific talent, but an opportunity to go to McCallie on scholarship (and I am assuming that is the case) is one that is very much beneficial both athletically and academically.  McCallie is a great school for both.   Bearden will be fine.  And so will both of those kids who decided with their parents/advisors to go elsewhere.  
    • I think we are conducting interviews now since we have so many wanting to come to school here and play for a real team with a chance to play in front of lot's of fan's and have a chance to win a championship every year.  
    • Esteemed colleagues, On this auspicious Saturday morning, I fortuitously encountered Dr. Satterfield at the Early Bird Cafe, whereupon we engaged in a discourse concerning the pool of candidates vying for a coveted position. Dr. Satterfield, possessing a discerning eye, has graciously shared insights into the contenders, which I shall now relay to you in a structured manner. Eric Vetetoe, though initially absent from my considerations, ascended to the zenith of Clint's roster, poised atop his discerning clipboard as a preeminent candidate. Kyle Gregory, with a coaching demeanor reminiscent of a bygone era, has captivated Clint's admiration. His interview performance, I am informed, left an indelible impression, aligning seamlessly with Clint's nostalgic sentiments. Davy Cothron's cerebral approach to offense, notwithstanding a past championship game setback, garners high praise from Dr. Satterfield. His strategic acumen, it appears, remains unblemished despite previous trials. Brandon Eden's steadfast allegiance to the team, evidenced by his tenure on the creekbank, earns him considerable favor in Clint's estimation. Anticipation lingers as to whether an offer may be extended in recognition of his unwavering dedication. Wesley Satterfield emerges as a compelling candidate following a favorable assessment by Mr. Satterfield himself. The prospect of a Satterfield succession holds a certain allure, embodying continuity and tradition in equal measure. Kyle Shoulders, a surprising entrant in the applicant pool, impresses Clint with his football intellect, potentially positioning him as a contender for the role. Josh Hackett's defensive prowess, particularly in encounters against Trousdale over recent years, earns commendation from Coach Satterfield, underscoring his proficiency in the strategic aspects of the game. John McNeal's track record of success across multiple sports affords him undeniable merit, though the prospect of his acceptance, if offered, remains uncertain. Chad Evitts, a former NFL luminary, presents a unique opportunity, recognized keenly by Mr. Satterfield, to infuse our program with elite expertise and experience. Matt Dyer, revered for his contributions during the regular season, faces scrutiny for his playoff performances, a dichotomy that weighs upon Clint's evaluation. Chuck Gentry, endorsed by Dr. Satterfield, embodies the promise of transformative leadership, drawing parallels to his past triumphs in revitalizing programs akin to ours. Clint extols BJ West's astute management at the middle school echelon, where his strategic maneuver of strategically calibrating the team's schedule to optimize performance stands as a testament to his sagacity and acumen in navigating competitive dynamics. In conclusion, the deliberations surrounding our prospective leadership remain nuanced and multifaceted, underscoring the significance of this decision in shaping the future trajectory of our esteemed institution.  
    • Unfortunately we did after the first hire, that's why we tried to fight it so bad. this is a bad situation for our community and school.
×
  • Create New...