Mairvul heads two Allin-Wick

[rebelwoman87]

5 minutes ago, Red Rebels said:

Actually, most were just messing with you when you were 91.

We tried to. Then we saw it was pointless. 

[Governm]

Just now, Red Rebels said:

Actually, most were just messing with you when you were 91.

Well,

I know for a fact that people in the WB community dont see it that way. A lot of people are not amused by what others say about WB. They dont think it is funny. AllRegion, for example, has called out the negativity towards WB on more than one occasion. I am not the only one who sees it that way. Far from it.

[Norman Dale]

4 hours ago, MomTo81 said:

I was lucky enough (insert eye roll) to sit right behind our student section last night. A. They didn't boo WB any more than WB boo'd us.  And they never called WB p*ss*'s, in the changes lyrics of their fight song the say "we're not p*ssy's".  As a parent of an MHS senior, I don't like their lyrics, but it's no different than when we changed the lyrics to our fight song at my HS. Kids will be kids.  

I wouldn't have brought up the matter of the cheer on coacht but since it has already been brought up, I will chime in that the use of the  " p word" in the cheer crosses the vulgarity line, IMO.

Edited September 30, 2017 by Norman Dale

[STARSNBARS]

27 minutes ago, TheGuvna said:

 Shad was hired. 

91 so inn tha werd's ov Lyle Jr......"Ewe steal gott Shad's back"...???......

[STARSNBARS]

6 minutes ago, Norman Dale said:

I wouldn't have brought up the matter of the cheer on coacht but since it has already been brought up, I will chime in that the use of the  " p word" in the cheer crosses the vulgarity line, IMO.

Agreed ND.....

[BarneySox2007]

3 hours ago, TheGuvna said:

Why are you certain that Maryville would have drove down the field and scored or won in overtime? Their offense really struggled against WB's defense. So much so, that they could not even score a td when we gifted them the ball inside the 10 on a bad snap on a punt.  Also, why doesnt the same logic apply to the loss to Whitehaven? They could have theoretically went down the field and scored to win had Maryville's 2 point conversion counted. Also, they could have won in overtime. Oh wait, they did do that. lol 

I would have had confidence for a few reasons Gov. Yes we played awful that night but GQ would have reached into his bag of tricks is one reason because WB would be one of those type teams that takes the bate and falls for it every time just like the hook and ladder Maryville pulled on them in that game for a touchdown.  During his time at Maryville he would manage to score just before halftime with less than 45 seconds on the clock on 80% of the teams we played while most teams were thinking about halftime would be number two. During that time for about ten straight years we always had a kicker that could nail it from 45 yards out so we didn't need to go all the way. Yep confidence would be the reason I would say that for sure.

[GREYRIDERx]

8 hours ago, TheGuvna said:

I was along the fence near the scoreboard endzone.

Unrealistic expectations? As I have said over and over, I expect them to be .500+ or above "most" years.  Those are not unrealistic or unreasonable expectations. Recent history proves they can meet that standard.

As for negativity, have you not seen the negativity directed at Shad and William Blount the last few years? It's clear that a lot of people get off on WB's misfortunes. You say people give WB a hard time because of me? Well, I am happy when Maryville loses because of all of the negativity directed at WB here on coacht. There was a time when I was really starting to root for Maryville in the playoffs, but what I have seen here changed that. It really started changing about the time Shad was hired. It was clear many people here wanted there to be a big scandal and for it to blow up in WB's face. 

I dont think anyone wanted there to be a big scandal but there eas one.. People shouldnt expect wb to act like they have been there when they havent.