Jump to content

Harriman @ Coalfield


rtl112
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

1 hour ago, rtl112 said:

What's everybodys take on this game, I'm beginning to think that we will be lucky to make the playoffs at this point.

It sounds like the D played pretty good last night but just couldn’t get the O going. I think this one is a toss up. Coalfield I think will pull this one out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Gbnation said:

It sounds like the D played pretty good last night but just couldn’t get the O going. I think this one is a toss up. Coalfield I think will pull this one out. 

 

Just now, Gbnation said:

It sounds like the D played pretty good last night but just couldn’t get the O going. I think this one is a toss up. Coalfield I think will pull this one out. 

Interceptions, fumbles and penalties sort of hurt us last night but I'm not taking away from York because they are  a good football team but I don't think they were 21 points better necessarily. It was a fun game to watch because of the physicality from both squads. Against the wing-t you have to play assignment football and we didn't in the second half.  For some reason, we quit putting a hat on the fullback in the second half. You gotta hit him whether he has the ball or not plus they really killed us with the QB sweep in the second half too.  I give credit to York's coaching staff because they do what they do well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, rtl112 said:

 

Interceptions, fumbles and penalties sort of hurt us last night but I'm not taking away from York because they are  a good football team but I don't think they were 21 points better necessarily. It was a fun game to watch because of the physicality from both squads. Against the wing-t you have to play assignment football and we didn't in the second half.  For some reason, we quit putting a hat on the fullback in the second half. You gotta hit him whether he has the ball or not plus they really killed us with the QB sweep in the second half too.  I give credit to York's coaching staff because they do what they do well. 

I agree about hitting the full back every play. He either has the ball or he’s a lead blocker more times than not. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Gbnation said:

I agree about hitting the full back every play. He either has the ball or he’s a lead blocker more times than not. 

Especially in the wing-t or the triple option were the fullback runs the dive play every single play.  They will lull you to sleep running the edges then when the middle linebacker starts leaning to the edges for help, then they kill you up the middle.  Of course we are pretty faithful to the 4-3 set, I wish we would load the box more against these run heavy teams. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • They’ve both gotten worse. I’ve seen enough games to know that. 
    • The only two transfers that Bearden has gotten that went on to play college football were a defensive back from Karnes, who transferred here way before the new coaching staff got here, and a running back from Carter, who went on to play at Maryville College. Both players received those offers while at Bearden, and both players got a diploma from Bearden High School. Therefore, they are Bearden kids, and you can’t do anything about that.   The transfer from Seymour didn’t win the job, what do you expect two quarterbacks to start at the same time? He played great on JV when he could stay healthy, and when he came in on varsity, he did great. The quarterback position is definitely going to be in good hands when the current starting quarterback leaves, but until then, they’re just going to be battling it out like every good quarterback competition does. The current starting quarterback has his flaws, and that is in the pass game, but what he doesn’t have flaws is running and scrambling, and if you go back and watch any game, which I’m sure you didn’t watch any, we used him very often, and when we needed a deep ball, we brought in the transfer from Seymour. The starting quarterback last year will be a senior this year, and the Seymour transfer will be a junior, so the Seymour transfer is definitely going to get his spotlight. He may even win the job this year. Football isn’t about who the newspaper thinks is the best kid. The best kid in the position will win the starting job, and I trust the coaching staff more than a newspaper or article to pick my starting QB.
    • I mean, we’ve only gotten two transfers that went on to play college football, one who went to UT Martin came his second semester junior year before the new coaching staff was here, and the other one went on to play at Maryville College, in which I don’t believe he had any interest prior to transferring.
    • An FYI: To see how an opponent has done against another opponent since 2001- go to the game by clicking on one of the teams. Click the G beside the game. For example, Milan: The info will show you the previous matchups and other info.
    • All these college signees went yo other schools for 3 years, were getting college offers then transferred to Bearden. It’s not like this staff did much to develop them.    The BBall coaches son and the Seymour transfer were some of the most talented QBs in the region, and you guys developed them into QBs who might complete one pass a game. 
×
  • Create New...