Jump to content

2022 Ladies Classic Tournament December 27-31 GreenEville, Tennessee


Americal198
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, Americal198 said:

Greeneville had a good lead for much of the game. That, and playing on Greeneville's home court, made it difficult for Cleveland, even though they made a great comeback.

Regarding the refs, the guy sitting next to me tonight insisted that the refs were intent on making calls that favored Greeneville. I seem to recall mention in this forum of the same thing last year, after Greeneville beat Cleveland. To suggest that referees would go to the length of helping or being partial to one team over another is to take away from the effort made by the Greeneville team.

The Hurst sisters both fouled out. That was the difference. 

As for a lack of leadership, I will agree, except I would apply that to last night's game when the Cleveland coach allowed his starters to mock-scream from the bench as they cheered on their subs, while running up the score against a South Greene team that was obviously bitten by the injury bug.

It shocks me if this is true.  From what I have seen from Cleveland is they always show class against an outmatched opponent.  Their starters usually play way less and the subs get plenty of action in blowouts.  No doubt they celebrate and cheer for each other.  That poses the age old question.  Should kids that rarely see the floor not try to score when they get in the game?  Just my two cents.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Nobodysomebody said:

Well once again Cleveland is out coached by a smaller team.  Even though the refs tried to help them, in the end didn’t happen.  Greenville took better shots while Cleveland looked at what was their best shot individually.  Cleveland with the talent they have should’ve won by 15 or more but lost.  Bad leadership!  Only worried about individuals!!!!  Cleveland will have a good record only because of what they play!!!!!

Greeneville had 2 starters go to the bench early in 1st half with 2 fouls and the starting point guard go the bench mid 2d qtr with 2 fouls.  Cleveland had some starters with 2 fouls in 1st half and their coach left them in and they picked up 3rd foul - I was shocked he left them in - it was obvious the referees were calling the game tight. The Cleveland fans yelled and complained the entire game about the referees but fouls were being called both ways - and an obvious over the back call on Cleveland was called with 6 seconds remaining & the call was reversed and called on Greeneville.  Cleveland is very talented but Greeneville outplayed them as a team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dadof23 said:

It shocks me if this is true.  From what I have seen from Cleveland is they always show class against an outmatched opponent.  Their starters usually play way less and the subs get plenty of action in blowouts.  No doubt they celebrate and cheer for each other.  That poses the age old question.  Should kids that rarely see the floor not try to score when they get in the game?  Just my two cents.

 

1 hour ago, Dadof23 said:

It shocks me if this is true.  From what I have seen from Cleveland is they always show class against an outmatched opponent.  Their starters usually play way less and the subs get plenty of action in blowouts.  No doubt they celebrate and cheer for each other.  That poses the age old question.  Should kids that rarely see the floor not try to score when they get in the game?  Just my two cents.

I understand that subs want and deserve to use the opportunity to play and score points. It's OK for the starters to "cheer and celebrate," but, in my opinion, this went beyond that and it didn't go over well with me. Any celebrating or cheering last night when the team was catching up to Greeneville sounded nothing like the previous night against South Greene.

The last thing I want to do is criticize the players. So, I believe it was the coach's responsibility to tone things down.

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Americal198 said:

 

I understand that subs want and deserve to use the opportunity to play and score points. It's OK for the starters to "cheer and celebrate," but, in my opinion, this went beyond that and it didn't go over well with me. Any celebrating or cheering last night when the team was catching up to Greeneville sounded nothing like the previous night against South Greene.

The last thing I want to do is criticize the players. So, I believe it was the coach's responsibility to tone things down.

 

 

 

 

 

Y’all mad about kids celebrating on the bench? How dare they support and cheer for their teammates. I personally love seeing the kids who play a lot get excited for the kids who don’t. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Americal198 said:

 

I understand that subs want and deserve to use the opportunity to play and score points. It's OK for the starters to "cheer and celebrate," but, in my opinion, this went beyond that and it didn't go over well with me. Any celebrating or cheering last night when the team was catching up to Greeneville sounded nothing like the previous night against South Greene.

The last thing I want to do is criticize the players. So, I believe it was the coach's responsibility to tone things down.

 

 

 

 

 

Y’all mad about kids celebrating on the bench? How dare they support and cheer for their teammates. I personally love seeing the kids who play a lot get excited for the kids who don’t. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, clevelandblueraiderfan said:

Y’all mad about kids celebrating on the bench? How dare they support and cheer for their teammates. I personally love seeing the kids who play a lot get excited for the kids who don’t. 
 

 

Yes, I have to agree with you.  I’m sitting there and watching the bench cheer and celebrating their teammates on the floor, what’s wrong with that.  The comment about the subs still scoring c’mon that’s their chance to play get over it.  Don’t like it stop them then from scoring.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Nobodysomebody said:

Yes, I have to agree with you.  I’m sitting there and watching the bench cheer and celebrating their teammates on the floor, what’s wrong with that.  The comment about the subs still scoring c’mon that’s their chance to play get over it.  Don’t like it stop them then from scoring.  

And the comment about them not celebrating the same against Greeneville…well of course not, they were losing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Nobodysomebody said:

Yes, I have to agree with you.  I’m sitting there and watching the bench cheer and celebrating their teammates on the floor, what’s wrong with that.  The comment about the subs still scoring c’mon that’s their chance to play get over it.  Don’t like it stop them then from scoring.  

Quick question for you.  Why do you seem to have such an axe to grind with Williams? You have been very outspoken against him on these boards.  He seems to do a good job in a tough place to coach girls basketball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Dadof23 said:

Quick question for you.  Why do you seem to have such an axe to grind with Williams? You have been very outspoken against him on these boards.  He seems to do a good job in a tough place to coach girls basketball.

I think Williams does a good job. Does he get out coached sometimes? Yes, but so does everyone else. Cleveland high school isn’t loaded with girls basketball talent. Cleveland was a 3 win team before he got here. My only gripes so far this season is not sticking with the zone against Bradley and not have the 6’3 player in the post more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, clevelandblueraiderfan said:

Y’all mad about kids celebrating on the bench? How dare they support and cheer for their teammates. I personally love seeing the kids who play a lot get excited for the kids who don’t. 
 

 

"Coachinhoops" visited my profile late last night. I invite him to go back a couple of years to some threads where he and his team were being trashed by an Internet troll from Bradley Central. I wasn't as concerned about the coach, who could take care of himself, but was more concerned about the slandering that some of Cleveland's players received.

More than once I suggested in the body of those threads that they be deleted. Finally, after things got very personal and nastier, I contacted the staff at CoachT and they decided to remove several messages. My main concerns were Cleveland's players, who could have been following along. 

There is such a thing as being gracious in winning. Nothing you will say will cause me to change my opinion. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • They’ve both gotten worse. I’ve seen enough games to know that. 
    • The only two transfers that Bearden has gotten that went on to play college football were a defensive back from Karnes, who transferred here way before the new coaching staff got here, and a running back from Carter, who went on to play at Maryville College. Both players received those offers while at Bearden, and both players got a diploma from Bearden High School. Therefore, they are Bearden kids, and you can’t do anything about that.   The transfer from Seymour didn’t win the job, what do you expect two quarterbacks to start at the same time? He played great on JV when he could stay healthy, and when he came in on varsity, he did great. The quarterback position is definitely going to be in good hands when the current starting quarterback leaves, but until then, they’re just going to be battling it out like every good quarterback competition does. The current starting quarterback has his flaws, and that is in the pass game, but what he doesn’t have flaws is running and scrambling, and if you go back and watch any game, which I’m sure you didn’t watch any, we used him very often, and when we needed a deep ball, we brought in the transfer from Seymour. The starting quarterback last year will be a senior this year, and the Seymour transfer will be a junior, so the Seymour transfer is definitely going to get his spotlight. He may even win the job this year. Football isn’t about who the newspaper thinks is the best kid. The best kid in the position will win the starting job, and I trust the coaching staff more than a newspaper or article to pick my starting QB.
    • I mean, we’ve only gotten two transfers that went on to play college football, one who went to UT Martin came his second semester junior year before the new coaching staff was here, and the other one went on to play at Maryville College, in which I don’t believe he had any interest prior to transferring.
    • An FYI: To see how an opponent has done against another opponent since 2001- go to the game by clicking on one of the teams. Click the G beside the game. For example, Milan: The info will show you the previous matchups and other info.
    • All these college signees went yo other schools for 3 years, were getting college offers then transferred to Bearden. It’s not like this staff did much to develop them.    The BBall coaches son and the Seymour transfer were some of the most talented QBs in the region, and you guys developed them into QBs who might complete one pass a game. 
×
  • Create New...