Jump to content

TSSAA BASKETBALL TOURNEY


alessic7
 Share

Recommended Posts

I'm at a misunderstanding with some of y'all. Indy played in their DISTRICT TOURNAMENT  last year against Brentwood, nolensville, and then ravenwood. Those were games for the DISTRICT tournament which Indy won and then moved on to play Hillsboro for regional title which was seeding for sub-state.. This year Indy wins the District and is then seeded to play Lincoln County 6-23 while 4 other teams from the district also advanced.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, alessic7 said:

I'm at a misunderstanding with some of y'all. Indy played in their DISTRICT TOURNAMENT  last year against Brentwood, nolensville, and then ravenwood. Those were games for the DISTRICT tournament which Indy won and then moved on to play Hillsboro for regional title which was seeding for sub-state.. This year Indy wins the District and is then seeded to play Lincoln County 6-23 while 4 other teams from the district also advanced.

No they didn’t those were region games after district tournament.

brentwood wasn’t even  in their district last year .

last year district was ravenwood,Columbia, Indy, nolensville and summit

 

in district tournament they beat Summit and Ravenwood.

as we’ve said before same setup it’s always been. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Either way, if you're going to send 4 teams from a district, do away with district tourney  and advance the top 4 finishers from the regular season. Make the regular season actually count. District tournaments are played on neutral courts there is no seeding advantage, especially when in competitive districts anyone can upset anyone in a one game scenario.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, alessic7 said:

Either way, if you're going to send 4 teams from a district, do away with district tourney  and advance the top 4 finishers from the regular season. Make the regular season actually count. District tournaments are played on neutral courts there is no seeding advantage, especially when in competitive districts anyone can upset anyone in a one game scenario.

I’m not even real sure what you’re trying to say? Lincoln county did finish in the top 4 of their district even at 6-23.

are you just mad because Brentwood got healthy and busted that bracket up this year?

The regular season does mean something,

it’s seeding for district tournament.

upsets are why march madness is the greatest sporting event on earth.

 

Edited by BeamerBall2
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, alessic7 said:

Either way, if you're going to send 4 teams from a district, do away with district tourney  and advance the top 4 finishers from the regular season. Make the regular season actually count. District tournaments are played on neutral courts there is no seeding advantage, especially when in competitive districts anyone can upset anyone in a one game scenario.

so you basically want it like Football, so that teams cant "cinderella" their way thru a tournament and make a DEEP run to either a region or even STATE tournament bid... *sigh* yeah Regular Season MEANS SOMETHING, especially in those districts that have an uneven number of teams, ya finish first you more than likely just have a Bye to the Region Tournament(just seeding matches after that) but for those who didn't do as well they have to play their way in, I've seen some teams pull off massive upsets as 5 and 6 seeds in 6-7 team districts and put a good run at trying to get to the Sub State, so what point are you trying to get at here... would you rather we just do like Football and just go "ok we just take 4 teams from each district(news flash some classes have districts that only have 3 due to enrollment issues, and/or sanctions), and just play straight to the big house from 64 teams; yeah... no, we've had this System for a while now and it ain't changing and MOST of the time it gets it right... i can tell ya what i have a problem with... "Blind drawing" the Elite 8 for each... how about  we SEED the teams and then pair them that way(putting teams from the same district on opposite ends of the bracket obviously) and do it that way... yeah ideal idea but never gonna happen *sigh*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Imagine if the NCAA tournament were seeded entirely based on how you finish in your conference tournament; it would be a sham; teams projected as high seeds based on their body.of work throughout the season would be left out if they were to lose an early conference tournament game. This is exactly how TSSAA is setting up their tournament.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, alessic7 said:

Imagine if the NCAA tournament were seeded entirely based on how you finish in your conference tournament; it would be a sham; teams projected as high seeds based on their body.of work throughout the season would be left out if they were to lose an early conference tournament game. This is exactly how TSSAA is setting up their tournament.

Projected high seeds aren't left out of the field of 68 if they don't win their conference tournament, but mid major teams can win theirs and make it to the big dance. You obviously have some kind of axe to grind and are twisting facts to try and support your narrative. Nothing in life will satisfy everyone, but the progressive system in place that rewards past achievements with future positioning is as good as it gets. The only "bad" part of TSSAA's system happens when that system of reward for past wins is interrupted and the blind draw for placement in the final eight takes place... more often than not the two best teams don't play for the gold & silver balls, but for the right to advance. Hard to argue that the best team didn't get the gold, but very often second best doesn't get the silver.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/27/2024 at 4:46 PM, alessic7 said:

Either way, if you're going to send 4 teams from a district, do away with district tourney  and advance the top 4 finishers from the regular season. Make the regular season actually count. District tournaments are played on neutral courts there is no seeding advantage, especially when in competitive districts anyone can upset anyone in a one game scenario.

District Tournaments is not a mandatory thing from the TSSAA. TSSAA can careless about the district tournaments, as long as they have "four teams" from this district. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, tradertwo said:

Projected high seeds aren't left out of the field of 68 if they don't win their conference tournament, but mid major teams can win theirs and make it to the big dance. You obviously have some kind of axe to grind and are twisting facts to try and support your narrative. Nothing in life will satisfy everyone, but the progressive system in place that rewards past achievements with future positioning is as good as it gets. The only "bad" part of TSSAA's system happens when that system of reward for past wins is interrupted and the blind draw for placement in the final eight takes place... more often than not the two best teams don't play for the gold & silver balls, but for the right to advance. Hard to argue that the best team didn't get the gold, but very often second best doesn't get the silver.

No twisting of facts bro. Maybe I can give an example that hits closer to home. Let's say UT, a possible projected 1 seed based on their body of work, lost in the quarterfinal of the SEC tourney to a solid team like a Miss St. UT would miss the NCAA tournament. This is the TSSAA setup. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, alessic7 said:

No twisting of facts bro. Maybe I can give an example that hits closer to home. Let's say UT, a possible projected 1 seed based on their body of work, lost in the quarterfinal of the SEC tourney to a solid team like a Miss St. UT would miss the NCAA tournament. This is the TSSAA setup. 

Not even the same. In high school if you lose in the finals you're done, lose in the semi final game and your done, lose in the quarterfinal game and your done, lose in sectionals and your done. Top two in regionals advance, top four in district advance, and district placement in regular season determines seeding for District Tournament.

  In the NCAA the body of work is judged by a panel of voters to determine who's in and where they are seeded, with the exception of provisions for tournament champions being awarded an automatic spot in the top 68.

  Would you rather have a system based on performance or let a bunch of dudes with bias argue for tournament placement? Bet you'd squeal like a rat if a committee placed your team  further down than you felt they deserved, or worse yet, if they didn't make the tournament at all and someone that they beat did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They quit doing the blind draw? The 2 best ranked teams in state play the last game on Wednesday (bradley, Clarksville, ) I haven't seen Clarksville play but bradley is a beast. Beat teams in Alabama and Florida that made their own state tourneys, prettily handedly too. Then best cleveland  who beat Blackman 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • Deja vu all over again, 7 yrs apart. SMDH Does anybody talk to each other?
    • OK, well, that’s because two quarterbacks can’t start. That’s football 101. The main quarterback won the starting job, so he was on varsity, and the Seymour transfer did not win the starting job. He played some varsity. He was mainly junior varsity, and he balled out when healthy, so for the starting quarterback who’s been starting varsity since his freshman year, if you have any form of proof that he’s gotten worse, somehow, whether that means stats or whatnot, please feel free to share.
    • They’ve both gotten worse. I’ve seen enough games to know that. 
    • The only two transfers that Bearden has gotten that went on to play college football were a defensive back from Karnes, who transferred here way before the new coaching staff got here, and a running back from Carter, who went on to play at Maryville College. Both players received those offers while at Bearden, and both players got a diploma from Bearden High School. Therefore, they are Bearden kids, and you can’t do anything about that.   The transfer from Seymour didn’t win the job, what do you expect two quarterbacks to start at the same time? He played great on JV when he could stay healthy, and when he came in on varsity, he did great. The quarterback position is definitely going to be in good hands when the current starting quarterback leaves, but until then, they’re just going to be battling it out like every good quarterback competition does. The current starting quarterback has his flaws, and that is in the pass game, but what he doesn’t have flaws is running and scrambling, and if you go back and watch any game, which I’m sure you didn’t watch any, we used him very often, and when we needed a deep ball, we brought in the transfer from Seymour. The starting quarterback last year will be a senior this year, and the Seymour transfer will be a junior, so the Seymour transfer is definitely going to get his spotlight. He may even win the job this year. Football isn’t about who the newspaper thinks is the best kid. The best kid in the position will win the starting job, and I trust the coaching staff more than a newspaper or article to pick my starting QB.
    • I mean, we’ve only gotten two transfers that went on to play college football, one who went to UT Martin came his second semester junior year before the new coaching staff was here, and the other one went on to play at Maryville College, in which I don’t believe he had any interest prior to transferring.
×
  • Create New...