Walker Valley - Cleveland

[Guest go4dagoldone]

did some research on here. The combined record of the instate opponents of your three teams that argue so much are like this

 

Cleveland 161 wins vs. 118 loses

Bradley 174 wins vs. 127 loses

Walker Valley 117 wins vs. 133 loses

 

Looks like the teams that Cleveland has played are a bit better than the ones that Bradley has played and then Bradley a little bit better than Walker Valleys. But it really doesn't matter cause in the end all of your teams will be playing for the gold and only one can win it. Probably none of these teams will be in the Boro anyway so if you have a 25-1 record or a 13-13 does it really matter. All three of these teams proved that they can win against good teams and bad teams. All three of these teams looked like they have winning records. All three teams will toss out the reocord and who beat who when it comes time for state. And if you're goal is to just have a good record and not go for a gold one then you don't set good goals. These three teams need to stop trashtalking each other on here and wait until the end. You don't see Shelbyville or LCHS or LA on here trashtalking, just ya'll Clinton, Oliver Springs and Oak Ridge.

[anspa]

cleveland by 9.

[peacemaker]

Sportsphan, You think getting beat by 9 is Bad? I would call that pretty close in my book- but it doesnt matter.- WV and Cleveland split on the season- now lets see if BC and Cleveland can split on the season- on Feb. 14th

[23sMom]

aren't ya'll tired yet?

[Guest chuck317mx]

im tired

[lwhite]

if you're tired, then don't read the threads or bother to post your "one liners"

 

I still think WV's the better team, just weren't that night. Raider2 I believe what happened was a couple of Cleveland's overlooked players made a difference in this game, and WV was unable to capitalize on the freebies

[peacemaker]

Good Night and sleep tight~