Jump to content

East & West Shrine Bowl


THE KING
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 25
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

As to coaching....the KY coaches far and away superior to the TN coaches in the TN KY game and the West coaches far and away better than the East coaches in the Shriners Game.

 

How were they that much better? What do you think the West coaches would have done differently had they been coaching the East roster?

TN KY Game the defensive coaches for TN allowed the interior lineman to both go outside opening a huge gap in the middle. Despite repeated draws for big yards up the middle by KY ...this continued and IMO cost TN the chance to come back. In addition the TE for KY went uncovered roaming across the middle and caught repeated passes in the same general area of the field. On the offesive side of the ball IMO they lacked imagination, there were no slants, few screens, and overall predictible calls given the down and distance.

 

In the Shriners game I felt that the East coaches should have tried to abandon there run game early, given the tremendous difference in ability between the East O -Line and the West D-line. Had East run a series of short quick passes, similar to what West ran, I believe they could have neutralized the tremendous impact the West D-Line made on that game. Perhaps the assets weren't there or there wasn't enough time to teach routes, whatever the case it looked bad.

 

As to where I coach....In my mind only and I do it best on Monday Mornings!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The coach for the east paid Byrd a very good compliment just before the second half started. It was obvious that the west's line on both sides of the ball was far superior. The skill players, no matter who they are, have to have blocking.

Cristman made a good showing, in my opinion. I sure would like to see him playing here at Tusculum, also.

Edited by moosebychoice
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Byrd is 5'9, which is still too short to play QB, but will still be a force wherever he plays. Back to the East-west game. The O and D lines were horrible or maybe the west was just that good. I was impressed with the Wests execution considering only one week of practice. The West coaches seemed to have the East coaches number when it came to intelligence of offense. The East and their 1950's style offense could do nothing. The west ran the shotgun with precision and had a good mix with the running game. Any hick coach can run the ball up the middle or around the end and the west was stopping it every time. Failure to mix up the offense was key to the Easts defeat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • Recent Posts

    • Marion County boys just got two DOGS. Y’all East Robertson folks better buckle your chin straps this year. They gonna have something for Groves up front this year. I’m just keeping it real 
    • A little confused.  What charter/prep schools made it to state in Baseball?  
    • Fortuitously encountering Clint amidst the ambience of Goodyear this morning sparked an impromptu yet intellectually stimulating conversation, wherein we engaged in a rigorous assessment of prospective candidates for the esteemed role of head football coach. Our discourse, characterized by its spontaneity and depth, led to the formulation of astute observations and discerning judgments regarding the suitability of various individuals for this pivotal position. Allow me to elucidate the fruits of our collaborative contemplation: This commentary endeavors to offer a discerning articulation of my subjective viewpoint, emphasizing a conscientious commitment to maintaining impartiality and refraining from any semblance of derogation directed towards individuals.  Those who possess meritorious qualifications for the esteemed head coaching role, delineated without hierarchical precedence, include: Rennard Woodmore, an esteemed alumnus of the Yellow Jackets, presents a magnificent pedigree, having held prominent positions in head coaching capacities across various regions. His pivotal role as a coordinator for teams contending for state championships further enhances his stature in the realm of football leadership. Kyle Gregory, erstwhile adorned in the resplendent gold insignia, though lacking direct head coaching experience, brings to the fore his invaluable insights garnered as a coordinator for esteemed teams, showcasing an acute understanding of the requisites for triumph whilst attired in the esteemed purple and gold regalia. Steven Jackson, whose contributions transcended mere clipboard duties under the tutelage of Kevin Creasy, emerges as an exceptional candidate for Trousdale County. His prior tenure and triumphs as an assistant coach underscore his suitability for the role. The sole drawback lies in his lack of affiliation with Trousdale County as an alumnus. Brandon Eden's extensive tenure within the chronicles of Trousdale County football, spanning a significant portion of its State Championships, coupled with his successful stints as a coordinator across diverse locales, underscores his candidacy despite a dearth of direct head coaching experience at the high school level. Davy Cothron, while beset by a modest playing career, has emerged as a luminary in offensive strategy, drawing parallels to the transformative appointment of Barker in 2015, thereby warranting consideration for his proven acumen in this realm. Joshua Hackett, notwithstanding his non-alumnus status, has left an indelible imprint across Middle Tennessee, distinguished by his adept curation of formidable defensive units as a coordinator at Watertown, albeit without direct head coaching experience. Kevin Creasy, the epitome of coaching prowess, merits an offer irrespective of his current inclinations, his unparalleled capacity to secure victories transcending geographical and institutional bounds, potentially extending to a role as Director of Schools should it align with his aspirations. Conversely, individuals who have not demonstrably earned the mantle of head coaching, enumerated without sequential precedence, encompass: Brad Waggoner David Barker Paul Pitts Jeremy Pruitt Clint Satterfield Robbie Atwood Wesley Satterfield Ben Johnson BJ West Whom do you all deem most fitting to assume the mantle of the next coach, and what rationale informs your choice? Conversely, whom do you perceive as ill-suited for the role, and what underpins your reasoning for their exclusion?
    • He's a Clinton fan.  But I wouldn't admit that either.  
    • Their any schedule out their for team camp?
×
  • Create New...