Opperman Posted February 6, 2005 Report Share Posted February 6, 2005 I understand where both sides are coming from on this, but, if they do institute a salary cap in the end, they may want to look at all the mistakes that were made when the big three sports started it. The NFL's cap was a joke for years, because it only restricted the yearly payroll snd didn't address front loading contracts. A player could only be making 4 mil a year on paper, but they would get some insane figure for a signing bonus, like Troy Aikman got 40 mil in a signing bonus that didn't figure into the cap. Basically making the cap worthless. 825553036[/snapback] The signing bonuses do count in the cap, but they're pro-rated for the length of the contract...if the contract isn't finished out, and they never are, the part of the signing bonus that's left to be pro-rated will be put on the next couple of years. All that stuff is really confusing, even though I try lol. I'm with you on you take as far as cost cutting measures go. The only thing wrong with it is that the $$ teams will buy championships just like the 97 Marlins did. Does anyone know if the NHL practices revenue sharing like football, wherein all teams are guaranteed X amount of $$? 825553036[/snapback] The NFL revenue-sharing system only works for one reason. Most of the NFL's revenue comes from its national TV contract. There isn't a whole lot of money, comparatively, in ticket sales (and ticket sales, aside from luxury suites, are split between both teams, basically), radio rights, jersey sales (if you buy a Peyton Manning jersey from Finish Line, the Patriots get just as much money for it as the Colts -- the only extra money would be the store markup if you buy from a team store directly -- so if you bought a Manning jersey at, say, a store inside the Coliseum, the Titans would actually get more money from it than the Colts), etc. The only revenue sharing the NFL has that other leagues don't is the ticket sales. That's why you see more PSL's in the NFL (those don't have to be split), etc. The thing is, all the other leagues get their biggest revenue item from ticket sales, not TV rights. (Well, except for the Expos last year ) I just wish they could come to some sort of an agreement. I can't understand how you can have meeting after meeting like Thursday's and not make any progress whatsoever! 825553036[/snapback] Well, the owners are going nuclear trying to get a cap, and the players refuse to do it. The owners better be careful...the players have the ultimate trump card here -- the owners' franchises are little more than worthless if they don't have the best players in the world playing for them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muffin Posted February 6, 2005 Report Share Posted February 6, 2005 And a good lose it is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gotmilk? Posted February 8, 2005 Report Share Posted February 8, 2005 Jeremy Roenick told NHL fans to watch MLB!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FHSrebel27 Posted February 16, 2005 Author Report Share Posted February 16, 2005 A very, very sad day... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
7059527176 Posted February 17, 2005 Report Share Posted February 17, 2005 Very sad, just hope my beloved Preds survive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muffin Posted February 17, 2005 Report Share Posted February 17, 2005 Thank god,and greyhound its finally over,and don,t have to worry about it until next year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FHSrebel27 Posted February 17, 2005 Author Report Share Posted February 17, 2005 7059... don't worry man! As Poile said today... "the Nashville Predators are here to stay." I'm cross as two sticks at the owners right now, but perhaps this is for the best. However, both sides MUST realize this is like a gun shot that just missed the heart... not starting on time in the fall will be like a secondary shot that doesn't miss! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigwheel11 Posted February 18, 2005 Report Share Posted February 18, 2005 Err...uh...how the heck did I mistype that? I'd rather see the PLAYERS get the money. I don't go to Blues games for the Lauries, I go to see Pronger, MacInnis, and company. 825532138[/snapback] Exactly how I feel. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Purple & Gold Standard Posted February 18, 2005 Report Share Posted February 18, 2005 Thank God it's over....Now can ESPN stop showing highlights of college hockey??...Please!?!? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FHSrebel27 Posted February 18, 2005 Author Report Share Posted February 18, 2005 There are more people than I guess you realize that care about college hockey. I wish they showed it more. This is why I can't wait for ESPNU which will no doubt have a lot of college hockey. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muffin Posted February 19, 2005 Report Share Posted February 19, 2005 There are more people than I guess you realize that care about college hockey. I wish they showed it more. This is why I can't wait for ESPNU which will no doubt have a lot of college hockey. 825572740[/snapback] Will not be watching that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
7059527176 Posted February 19, 2005 Report Share Posted February 19, 2005 Hold on everybody, espn.com is reporting that owners and players have agreed on a 45 million dollar cap and will meet Saturday in hopes of saving the season, looks like we COULD see some hockey this year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.