Voldawg Posted February 8, 2005 Report Share Posted February 8, 2005 On Tuesday, Jim Rome said about TO and his press conference that TO needed props for what he did in the super bowl. 46 days after shredding his ankle, he was back and back in full force. He was heroic like Shilling did for Boston and his dedication to his team. Some say he was doing for his own glory, but even TO said if he would have been Brett Farve we would all be singing his praises of what he did... What do you all think? :justwrestle: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
king_of_this_city_13 Posted February 8, 2005 Report Share Posted February 8, 2005 On Tuesday, Jim Rome said about TO and his press conference that TO needed props for what he did in the super bowl. 46 days after shredding his ankle, he was back and back in full force. He was heroic like Shilling did for Boston and his dedication to his team. Some say he was doing for his own glory, but even TO said if he would have been Brett Farve we would all be singing his praises of what he did... What do you all think? :justwrestle: 825557106[/snapback] I think it was all personal glory on TO's part... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bhsOL Posted February 8, 2005 Report Share Posted February 8, 2005 I think that TO just desperately wanted to play in the Super Bowl and that's it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muffin Posted February 8, 2005 Report Share Posted February 8, 2005 I think that TO just desperately wanted to play in the Super Bowl and that's it. 825557222[/snapback] He wanted to play and prove everyone wrong,and he did. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gotmilk? Posted February 8, 2005 Report Share Posted February 8, 2005 On Tuesday, Jim Rome said about TO and his press conference that TO needed props for what he did in the super bowl. 46 days after shredding his ankle, he was back and back in full force. He was heroic like Shilling did for Boston and his dedication to his team. Some say he was doing for his own glory, but even TO said if he would have been Brett Farve we would all be singing his praises of what he did... What do you all think? 825557106[/snapback] It doesnt matter, because Schilling got his ring, where is TO's? So he shouldnt be compared to Schilling! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoachTVA Posted February 10, 2005 Report Share Posted February 10, 2005 He wanted to play and prove everyone wrong,and he did. 825557444[/snapback] Well Muffin, you were right and I was wrong on this one. I was one of the main opponents of him playing, because of the possibility of permanent injury. I'm actually glad I was wrong in this case. I do think that his motivation for playing was personal glory, but he's not alone in that category. There are alot of players out there that do things to boost their ego. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wingman10 Posted February 10, 2005 Report Share Posted February 10, 2005 TO is for TO. His press conference after the game was very typical. He just kept praising himself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swanson71 Posted February 10, 2005 Report Share Posted February 10, 2005 I think that TO just desperately wanted to play in the Super Bowl and that's it. 825557222[/snapback] Exactly... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coach15 Posted February 12, 2005 Report Share Posted February 12, 2005 (edited) he played great in the Super Bowl....but what I think is funny is Fred-X Mitchell implying that is why they lost...because TO got the ball and Fred-X didnt Edited February 12, 2005 by coach15 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redthunder6 Posted February 13, 2005 Report Share Posted February 13, 2005 TO is for TO. His press conference after the game was very typical. He just kept praising himself. 825559927[/snapback] That is jsut how he is. If I were as talented as he is you better believe I would be letting the whole world know it. he played great in the Super Bowl....but what I think is funny is Fred-X Mitchell implying that is why they lost...because TO got the ball and Fred-X didnt 825562451[/snapback] I mean he Freddie just didnt praise his hands enough. I still think Freddie is a good solid #2 or #3 WR. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.