Jump to content

Vince Young Reportedly Bombs Wonderlic


Recommended Posts

According to ESPN, the "real" Wonderlick scores have been released. Vince didn't get a 6, or a 16.. He got a 15. BTW, Dan Marino got a 14. Fitzgerald from Harvard (last year I believe) got a 40- the all-time high.

Lowest score this year for a QB was Marcus Vick at 11.

Lowest score ever for a QB was Jeff George with a 10.

 

You can debate the merits of this measuring stick all you want, but you have to believe that an NFL GM drafting a franchise QB, would feel a little uneasy with an "improved" score of a 15. That kind of score, for the Titan's offense, might prove a red flag.

 

Also, at his pro-day yesterday, Vince Young posted anywhere from a 4.5-4.6 in the forty. That is good for a man his size playing QB, but he won't outrun linebackers or many defensive ends in the NFL. Let's stop the talk about the next Michael Vick. Vick is an entirely a different class speed-wise. Of the next Steve Young, who ran a 4.4 in the forty. Young is a better than average speed guy for a QB, faster than Cutler at 4.7, but still not someone who will blow by people.

 

His one on one workouts with the Titans will tell them everything they need to know.

 

I think the 40 is blown way out of porportion! Its good to have speed, but its alot different running straight down a field with no pads on and running down a field dodging other players that are trying to rip your head off! I have seen guys that didnt have an impressive 40, but you put them in the game and they look like sprint champions!!!! ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I think the 40 is blown way out of porportion! Its good to have speed, but its alot different running straight down a field with no pads on and running down a field dodging other players that are trying to rip your head off! I have seen guys that didnt have an impressive 40, but you put them in the game and they look like sprint champions!!!! :lol:

 

Yeah sometimes there is a difference depending on the situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good points, but how else would you establish some benchmark to see who is fast and who isn't?

The 40 time is broken down two ways, first 10 yards (acceleration, burst), and finish (sustainable speed). Rarely does anyone other than a wide receiver or kick/punt teams run 40 yards.

 

That is why they also have the shuttle run, which shows burst, change of speed, and ability to get back to speed.

 

You combine all of these and you get a pretty accurate picture of how fast or quick the athlete is. The 40 time is the most easily understood of the running measurements, and has thus become (rightly or wrongly) THE standard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good points, but how else would you establish some benchmark to see who is fast and who isn't?

The 40 time is broken down two ways, first 10 yards (acceleration, burst), and finish (sustainable speed). Rarely does anyone other than a wide receiver or kick/punt teams run 40 yards.

 

That is why they also have the shuttle run, which shows burst, change of speed, and ability to get back to speed.

 

You combine all of these and you get a pretty accurate picture of how fast or quick the athlete is. The 40 time is the most easily understood of the running measurements, and has thus become (rightly or wrongly) THE standard.

 

I am not saying that its right or wrong, I am just saying I think it is over-rated! And you are right, there is no other way to evaluate speed that the 40, yet I have seen players that run a 4.5 or 4.6 outrun guys in a game that are suppose to run 4.3! Which could absolutley mean that one has a quicker burst while the other can sustain that speed longer! :angry:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • I'm not a Powell grad.  I am a Bearden grad.   My son and daughter are Powell grads.   I did radio play by play for Powell, my last year was 2013. I also did radio play by play for South Doyle, and my last gig was at Maryville before I retired.   My oldest grandson plays in the Karns Middle program, so I see more Karns games than I do Powell these days.  I've been to 3 Powell games since 2013.   I don't have any ties to Powell, haven't since 2013.   No "y'all" there.    And the kid you are talking about does have a very good arm, but he's not the QB that Deuce Rogers is.  Rogers is a legit dual threat guy.  The younger kid now at Clinton, or about to be at Clinton, isn't the dual threat that Rogers is.  
    • No sir. I watched it specifically and it was very dirty. He cleated the boy on purpose. Apparently, it’s an issue in football as well from what several schools have said. That said, looking forward to a good game 3. ER hit it well in game 2.
    • He is the transfer. 5star spoke on him in their new qb1 series. Didn’t list em as a transfer but I knew the name 
    • Gunner Warren was the second starter, freshman. SP #1 arm impressed me last night.
×
  • Create New...